Remote Control?

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
diyAudio Member
Joined 2004
Hi all,

One thing I've never seen or heard anyone do in DIYAudio is a remote control for the volume. I've seen plenty of attenuators with motors but what about the IC logic controllers and IR sensors for the remote control?

I would greatly appreciate any links or info folks have on this subject.
 
You would need:

An IR reciever to pick up 35KHz RC5/whatever IR signals
A Microcontroller (pretty much unavoidable)
For driving a motor, a H-bridge IC or discrete H-bridge.

The second part is the stumbling block for most users, but there's really no practical way around it.

Rod Elliot saves the day though as he has a remote control project: http://sound.westhost.com/project110.htm still involving a PIC microcontroller but you can get these pre-programmed from him.
 
jaycee said:
That's OK if you're happy making your own remote handset. If you want to use standard remote controls though, they all speak RC5 or such, so you pretty much need a microcontroller.

The Philips RC5 is only one of MANY completely different remote control systems, although it is the singular most popular one - presumably because Philips are a major component supplier to other manufacturers?.
 
diyAudio Member
Joined 2004
Vikash said:
Hi Ant, what did you end up with?

Hi Vikash

As of yet nothing but I found out the eaiest method, for me, would be a Dact stepped attenuator (8-way variety) with the Bent Audio remote kit for the Dact.

Here's the attenuator:
http://www.dact.com/html/attenuators.html

And the remote:
http://www.bentaudio.com/parts/dact.html

Also take a look at an exact same configuration that Ed built (its under 'Volume Control' on this page):

http://www.duffroomcorrection.com/wiki/User:Ed_Wildgoose
 
That would be something nice......

There have been a few attempts at this, but the serious ones both went sort of semi-commercial ,-
the www.apoxcontrols.com is not longer supported,
www.dantimax.dk is.......

The source and volume part is fairly simple, but we need a uP guy for the programming....personally, i have hardly used a compiler in the last 15 years. Anyone volunteering for the job?

Could be a "forum owned" design.... I will happily join in fomulating the system part and the hardware..

EDIT: perhaps we could persuade the Apox guys to donate their design to the forum, - since they don't support it anymore....:angel:
It certainly looked like a very good design for the job

2.EDIT If this was to become a reality, one should make sure to use a freeware orr shareware compiler... PICs or better ATMELs seeems to be the uP closest at hand. The shareware area for ATMEL is huge......
 

fab

Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
AuroraB said:
That would be something nice......

There have been a few attempts at this, but the serious ones both went sort of semi-commercial ,-
the www.apoxcontrols.com is not longer supported,
www.dantimax.dk is.......

The source and volume part is fairly simple, but we need a uP guy for the programming....personally, i have hardly used a compiler in the last 15 years. Anyone volunteering for the job?

Could be a "forum owned" design.... I will happily join in fomulating the system part and the hardware..

EDIT: perhaps we could persuade the Apox guys to donate their design to the forum, - since they don't support it anymore....:angel:
It certainly looked like a very good design for the job

2.EDIT If this was to become a reality, one should make sure to use a freeware orr shareware compiler... PICs or better ATMELs seeems to be the uP closest at hand. The shareware area for ATMEL is huge......

I finally ordered the dantimax kit. I first got good support when mounting it but after that the remote kit with the Alps motorized pot seems a little slow (about 16 seconds to complete the full course of the pot while continuously maintainning the volume button of the remote control). I now get no response from dantimax. Also, it seems to move with noticeable steps. Is that normal? Can someone comment?
Maybe the uP program is not optimized?

Thanks
 
How about this:

http://www.mhennessy.f9.co.uk/preamp/index.htm

Looks like a fairly well thought out preamp, using a PGA2310 for the volume control, and a PIC microcontroller to control everything.

I'm thinking of doing something similar myself, but with a pair of power amps integrated, as well as a board for switching video signals. Sort of a suround receiver with the surround bit removed, and a little more attention paid to the audio specs :)

Cheers,

Suzy
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.