Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th December 2005, 02:09 PM   #21
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Prague,Czech Republic
This amp have " high biased driver stage ", which drive load and by higher levels also OS. Crossover distortion will be " shifted " near to higher levels and probably will be less hearable, than by " normal " amp...Thanks to using of input j-fets sound will be little bit softer, than by using of BJT ones at this position... Price of devices will be funny...
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th December 2005, 02:11 PM   #22
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bangalore, India
I dare to say to all Gainclone lovers that the Gainclone is not the final word in SS amplification.

Perhaps, Widowmaker's circuit sounds 'significantly better' than the gainclones that he heard.

I for one have the Stochino Amp which leaves the competition of the Gainclone far behind.

Those who want to debate can define 'significantly better' according to their terms and I mean it includes all that.
__________________
Sam
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th December 2005, 02:28 PM   #23
thanh is offline thanh  Viet Nam
diyAudio Member
 
thanh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ho chi minh city
Send a message via Yahoo to thanh
I'm using amp with current mirror . I found that matching input tst will give a strong bass . Perhaps you matched input jfets well
__________________
Justice for Victims of Agent Orange
http://www.petitiononline.com/AOVN/Thank all of you!
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th December 2005, 03:22 PM   #24
ilimzn is offline ilimzn  Croatia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Zagreb
Looks like something similar to a current dumping scheme to me, rather than error correction as such. I've done something similae but with BJTs and OP-amp front end, perhaps 7 years ago, worked quite well, actually.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th December 2005, 03:52 PM   #25
diyAudio Member
 
Hanzwillem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hengelo, The Netherlands
Quote:
Originally posted by rick57
What is the degree of difficulty to build, vs gainclone, or a Nelson Pass class A amp?

And what was the total parts cost?

Thanks
I believe by these points this can never be competition. The difference in number of parts (and thus price) is just too big. I do not believe everyone that has a GC can say that it is the best amp in the world. But could just be the best that little money and specially effort can buy.
Unless you put all the fets for the amplification stages of this amp into one IC and sell it for 5 bucks... I thought the whole idea of GC is the minimal component count, you do not even need a circuit board to build one, just solder the few caps and resitors onto the pins...

My compliments for the excellent design. But I think the name is not appropriate. It is just a different league...
__________________
They must have been holy chips or something - Pedro
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th December 2005, 04:04 PM   #26
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Prague,Czech Republic
I don't understand uninterrupted desire for some simply design... Man, who knows to solder twenty devices, quite well solder thirty or fifry devices... I'm asking : Who wash you brains, that you are still thinking it ? I know one apostel...
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th December 2005, 04:06 PM   #27
diyAudio Member
 
Peter Daniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Send a message via AIM to Peter Daniel
I would suggest a name for that thread: 'The Death of MY Gain Clone', because mine is still doing very well:

http://www.6moons.com/lettersfeedbac...sfeedback.html
My current system consists of Zu Druids, Modwright SWL 9.0 SE and I just received my Patek SE. That little amp is a freakin' work of art. Small yes, but like the watch, it is a gem. WOW!

Now to the sound. My last amp was the Aleph J and prior to that was the First Watt F2 and a Butler 2250 before that. All pieces I learned about from 6moons. Anyway, I thought the Aleph J was superb, but the Patek is in a different league. Stunning, dynamic, powerful and yet smooth as silk. Massed strings have no etch whatsoever, bass is deep and powerful and tuneful. The imaging and layering of the soundstage is unlike anything I have ever heard. I have had a pretty good sense of images across the stage, but never the layers of depth that I am getting now.

I just wanted to thank you for going down this path and writing about it. This combo is going to get me off the treadmill, that's for sure. Ear-to-ear grins abound!

Steve Jeffcoat
__________________
www.audiosector.com
“Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th December 2005, 04:11 PM   #28
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Prague,Czech Republic
And all tested by listening of CD format....Or not, Peter ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th December 2005, 04:16 PM   #29
diyAudio Member
 
Peter Daniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Send a message via AIM to Peter Daniel
I actually find myself listening a lot to live FM transmissions these days.
__________________
www.audiosector.com
“Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th December 2005, 04:32 PM   #30
lineup is offline lineup  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
lineup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
Quote:
Originally posted by Samuel Jayaraj
I dare to say to all Gainclone lovers that the Gainclone is not the final word in SS amplification.

Perhaps, Widowmaker's circuit sounds 'significantly better' than the gainclones that he heard.

I for one have the Stochino Amp which leaves the competition of the Gainclone far behind.

Those who want to debate can define 'significantly better' according to their terms and I mean it includes all that.
This is the schematic of a 'High-speed 100W amplifier' based on Stochino design from 1997 Electronics & Wireless World.

It is far more complicated than DoGC.

Notice use of parallelled 2N5551 and 2N5401 small signal transistors!
as drivers of IRF640 and IRF640 HEXFET.

Aslo using TL431 as VBE-multiplier to set/hold output stage bias.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg stochino.jpg (71.9 KB, 4594 views)
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inv Gain Clone with on board PSU anbello Chip Amps 65 7th May 2008 02:32 PM
CD player for Gain Clone falcott Digital Source 5 26th September 2004 07:04 AM
For all Gain Clone fans................. ashok Chip Amps 21 28th June 2004 12:07 AM
What is a Gain Clone exactly? Lars Clausen Chip Amps 33 26th November 2003 06:33 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:46 AM.

Page generated in 0.12542 seconds (79.04% PHP - 20.96% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio