Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 16th November 2005, 12:48 PM   #11
diyAudio Member
 
12 Cents's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
I was wondering if the precision of standard stereo pots is sufficient. Linkwitz writes IIRC, that pots should not be used in his active filters. However, I tried to simulate, and with the second resistor (the one at Opamp IN+) in an LR2 LP having only 2/3rd of the first resistor value, the outputs are 8° out of phase and a bump of <1dB is noticed in the LP + HP sum output. Any opinions?
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2005, 03:13 PM   #12
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
 
richie00boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gloucestershire, England, UK
If you're after the ultimate performance they aren't great and the higher the filter order the worse the problem is. That said, I've built 2nd- and 4th-order filters with common Alps pots and they have all been fine.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2005, 03:17 PM   #13
metal is offline metal  Jordan
diyAudio Member
 
metal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Helo 12 cents

I got no options, ehat do you think ..the notch filter has a variable center frequency, that is 79Hz to 140Hz, and there should be a phase difference. btw, I can sya this is not the best way to enforce bass in deed. I talked to russ yester day, and he told me there are better ways, using a 2nd or 4th order bandpass filter, and summing its out put signal with the original one, but that should be carefully designed to avoid phase lags between the original signal and the bandpassed bass signals.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2005, 03:21 PM   #14
metal is offline metal  Jordan
diyAudio Member
 
metal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Hello richie00boy

Can you share the filter circuit you are using for your subs.

BTW, I was looking for a filter circuit the enforces bass without using any subs, I always see those huge stereos which have only two woofers and two tweeters, they got a button by which you can increase the bass, that is, bass boost button. Any circuits suggestion here please.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2005, 06:14 PM   #15
diyAudio Member
 
12 Cents's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Thanks richie.

metal, ...bass boost... do you want to equalize a driver or just gain some "kick bass"?
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2005, 04:40 PM   #16
metal is offline metal  Jordan
diyAudio Member
 
metal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Quote:
Originally posted by 12 Cents
Thanks richie.

metal, ...bass boost... do you want to equalize a driver or just gain some "kick bass"?
Hey 12 cents

you got it, gain some "kick bass"

Can you suggest some thing brilliant...

Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2005, 04:46 PM   #17
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
 
richie00boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gloucestershire, England, UK
The filter circuit is basically the same as what you have drawn up with a some small component value differences.

If you want to make a loudness (bass boost) circuit be aware that it will stress your speakers much more. If you want lots of bass a sub or big speakers is the only way to go really.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2005, 04:56 PM   #18
metal is offline metal  Jordan
diyAudio Member
 
metal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Hello

I did simulated the bass boost circuit yesterday night using circuit maker, in deed, results were just amazing, the bass was boosted 4 times, just changing the 330 to 220 simply did that, also the group delay thingy was acceptable, and most important was that the circuit doesn't affect other signals at all.

If you can, will you post your schematic with values to be able to comapre that.

Regarding the speaker stress, I know that, but I don't want to increase the system cost, you know, some guys are not aware of the quality as they are to cost for me, I orefer the bi-amplified systems, so, I am really aware about that

Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2005, 05:04 PM   #19
diyAudio Member
 
jackinnj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Llanddewi Brefi, NJ
just parenthetically (as it is out of current production) Zetex made a continuously variable bandpass filter for audio -- the Zetex ZTX36FL01 -- it had a mixer so that you could tune the frequency and maintain "Q" (which was set by one resistor) -- too bad it's past tense --
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2005, 05:05 PM   #20
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SIUE, Illinois, USA
there are a few things that can be done. simply put, real bass boost is not possible. this would be something like a linkwitz transform where extra power is put to the speaker at very low frequencies. this would extend the response down to 20hz, but would require more power and more excursion. that'd be bad.

next thing that can be done is to increase the bass at useable frequencies -- basically boost the harmonics. if you compress the music this will work better. but sound quality will suffer. still it may be justified if the "clean" levels are too soft.

Another more advanced method is to use DSP to add harmonics to the music that, when played, fool the ear into hearing lower fundamental that are not actually being played.


As for the sallen key filters:
with a gain of 1, the circuit is resistively normalized -- if the resistors are equal value then the capacitors can be used to easily set the Q and Fc of the filter.

my preference is for a gain of 2. then the circuit is capacitively normalized -- if the capacitors are equal value the resistors can be used to easily set the Q and Fc of the filter.

i'll post the analysis later
__________________
if only it could be used for good, not evil...
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Variable frequency active crossover FrankDIY Solid State 22 4th July 2009 04:30 PM
LM555 as variable frequency oscillator xyz9915 Everything Else 1 17th June 2009 01:10 PM
variable infrasonic filter djronbxs Solid State 0 20th November 2007 10:05 AM
Variable feedback to enhance damping factor at low frequency svokke Tubes / Valves 8 7th June 2007 05:14 PM
Variable frequency low pass filter pk386 Chip Amps 11 25th September 2004 02:43 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:35 PM.

Page generated in 0.11875 seconds (79.40% PHP - 20.60% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio