|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
I have tried to search for info on whether damping factor matters for headphones, and, not surprisingly, found contradictory answers. On this forum I found some claims that it does matter. Somebody said that Sennheiser design their headphones assuming a zero-Ohm output impedance. Somebody referred to somebody elses measurements, but the link was unfortunately dead. On the other hand, according to this link
http://www.epanorama.net/circuits/he...ttenuator.html there is an IEC standard that headphone outputs should have 120 Ohm output impedance (or do I misunderstand?), so then most headphone manufacturers ought to design for that, one thinks. It is also claimed that damping factor anyway shouldn't matter for correctly designed headphones. So what should one make of this? The reason I was wondering is that a very common and practical way to implement headphone protection is to have an output series resistance and a relay that can short the output to ground via this resistor. For practical reasons one doesn't want a too small resistor. However, the epanorama link additionally raises the question whether one even should have a 120 Ohm resistor on the output? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Christer,
The guy inn the link sounds like he knows what he is talking about. If indeed phones are NOT mass controlled but resistance controlled, damping would be a non-issue. That would mean output driving Z is a non issue. The 120 ohms appears to be selected to be about right for different types, but not a specific value for acooustic reasons, so you would be at liberty to vary it depending on your needs. Maybe you could do a quick check of the IEC pub, if you have access to it? Jan Didden
__________________
/Another new issue: Linear Audio Volume 3! |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
Damping factor has some influence. Check this . As you can see the frequency response gets not flat, more like a boost in the base.
I have also listened with 120 ohms out and 10 ohms out and the difference is huge may the golden ears say but I'll find it microscopical, almost zero in fact. I used 150 ohms Sennheiser HD545. Christer if you have 100-120 ohms out you will get both short circuit protection aslo attentuation if you use low-Z cans.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
But Per-Anders, that seems to be a measurement of the amplifier under different load conditions. I want to know how and if the headphones are affected by the output impedance. Designing the amplifier to handle different load is important, but a different issue.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
The only thing you can see from measurements is that the voltage is increased a bit in the bass. Is the headphone affected? Don't know, I'll just listen in this case.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Paris
|
According to Jan Meier, the output impedance matters.
For the maths, see here : http://www.meier-audio.homepage.t-on...tipstricks.htm
__________________
Ben. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
Quote:
Jan, Yes, the guy at epanorama certainly sounds like he knows what he is talking about. On the other hand, there are many people who sound like that without actually knowing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Christer,
I must say that Jan Meier doesn't really give any arguments why the phone imp would be freq deopendent. The story of break in also detracts from his credibility. The measurements shown above certainly do NOT agree with him. They seem to indicate that only minor changes result from different damping (different Zout). There is SOME effect, but orders of magnitude less than with speakers. So, my vote goes to the first guy. Jan Didden
__________________
/Another new issue: Linear Audio Volume 3! |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Christer ![]() Build a CMOY or similar and connect a trimpot in series and test different values. You will be surprised how little difference it makes. When you have done that yopu can also compare what Dr Meier says. Are small things big or are they small?
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Damping factor in DIY amp | jaya000 | Solid State | 25 | 25th September 2008 11:27 AM |
| What is SI T-Amp DF (damping factor)? | skrstic | Class D | 1 | 23rd April 2008 09:49 PM |
| Damping factor | Cro maniac | Chip Amps | 29 | 8th May 2004 01:16 PM |
| Damping factor | thylantyr | Solid State | 9 | 14th March 2003 06:37 AM |
| Damping factor..????? | emarald | Solid State | 15 | 30th January 2003 02:41 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12457 seconds (84.66% PHP - 15.34% MySQL) with 10 queries |