|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 | |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me Tube Buffered Gainclone in work |Thread |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
anyway, i'm thinking building a little IC-based amplifier, a 47 Laboratories Gaincard clone if you will. i currently have the Blue Circle Music Pump mono amps (basically Gaincard clones in a woman's pump shoe) which i'm reviewing for a magazine, and i'm shocked at how good they sound. no not the ultimate sound, but really quite good and very musical. i'm pretty sure they use the LM1875 chip, which is so simple to implement, so i would like to build a really compact amp to use as a mini-system or for computer speakers. i am just wondering if i should try something new, and maybe run the IC in inverting configuration... wonder if that would work with what is essentially a power op-amp? any possible side effects to this in a higher-current application like this one? cheers, dorkus |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Diego
|
... a resistor between the base and emitter of the 2n2222 --- or perhaps some other means of loading the 3904, to make the 3904 turn on hard enough to behave well.
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
One disadvantage of the inverting config is that the noise gain is always higher than the signal gain. Sounds cryptic?
Consider that for a gain of -1 (both resistors equal) the input signal really is attenuated by the input resistor and the feedback resistor (halved in this way), so even if it looks like a gain of 1, the opamp really internally has to amplify the signal by 2. That means that all noise and distortion generated in the opamp is also amplified by 2 rather than one (hence the name 'noise gain'). If you get more fancy with feedback topologies the signal gain and the noise gain can be quite different and it will look like the feedback factor is less effective than expected. Jan Didden |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
|
Hi folks, I won't get into the deep technical critique, cos I would have no idea what I was talking about
, but here is a forum you might find interesting-http://pub4.ezboard.com/ffakeidsfrm1 I am currently building inverting and non inverting versions using the LM3875, using the info from this forum, and hey, I think I might be learning something!
__________________
Al I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort |
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto
|
I have to update this circuit, but this was one of the later configurations with some better transistors on the output stage and a better tuned feedback loop. The comment above of loading the 3906 is quite valid depending on what op-amp you are using. I actually loaded the AB output of the op-amp into the negative rail which improved the quality a bit.
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
hmm ok, so even if i need a relatively high input impedance, is inverting-input configuration still recommended? e.g. i want to have 50k input impedance with 26dB gain, this would require a 1Mohm feedback resistor - very high, would noise and distortion performance suffer? would i be better off using non-inverting to get this high an input impedance?
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
The one and only
|
Every time you mention inverting phase or phase
splitting to the semi technical audiophile, they go into shock. I have another hypothesis which occurs when the stage is not being used for much gain: It is my experience that at low and unity gains, a lot of op amps are on the edge of oscillation. Over the years I have made a number of bad sounding circuits (no, not ones you've seen) and many of them were bad sounding not because they were oscillating, but because they were near the edge. If I opened up the feedback gain, they got better as they moved farther from the edge. As a result, whenever I use op amps in an audio circuit, which is not often, I make sure that I either use up or throw away about 20 dB of open loop gain. If the circuit has a gain of 10 or greater, this is automatically achieved. If the circuit has less than 20 dB gain, I toss some away. With an inverting amp, a resistor from the - input to ground will do it. If not, then resistance from both + and - to ground is used. Works like glue....
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Looking Glass, TX
|
So the noise gain is higher than the signal gain I suppose. I notice your ZEN, Aleph X, and X amps are an inverting topology. Would there be advantages in converting our Aleph amps to inverting designs for us DYIers?
Alice |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Denmark
|
not comment on the work done by passlabs, but yes i would think that there would be a more stable amp... But the sound will change! Too the better ?? I don't know!
Sonny |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Inverting opamp cct ...blocking cap? - help! | HankMcSpank | Solid State | 1 | 28th March 2009 10:24 AM |
| Class D input LM311 Inverting input | zox2003 | Class D | 1 | 1st February 2008 07:48 AM |
| Inverting opamp input resistors calculation (pic) | redrabbit | Parts | 3 | 18th July 2007 09:12 AM |
| Input impedance of a non-inverting op amp? | glennb | Chip Amps | 24 | 21st May 2004 03:24 AM |
| Input impedence of inverting gainclone | PHilgeman | Chip Amps | 1 | 7th January 2004 03:33 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |