|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Krakow
|
Hello!
I was wondering why nobody did not try diamond buffer built of mosfets? or did not write about it? Is it obvious? Please look at the circuit. The first pair is IRF540/9540 (or any low power mosfets pair), output pair IRFP140/9240. Large heatsinks have to be used. I only do not know if there is a need to mount all of the mosfets on it, or only 140/9240? In this case small heatsinks should be use for 540/9540.
__________________
regards, Pawel |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Krakow
|
Please look at the simulation results, input voltage = 1V~, output almost the same.
Nice distribution! Large offset might be a problem, maybe there will be necessary to use a DC-servo? However 0.1 Ohm resistors stabilises output current during changing of the temperature. Besides some amplifiers have at the output +-0.6V DC.
__________________
regards, Pawel |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Krakow
|
And this is the graph of +-15V~ at the output.
Nice too! The circuit has relatively high input impedance (and capacitance?). It seems to be ideal choice to use tube or good quality opamp preamp!
__________________
regards, Pawel |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Prague,Czech Republic
|
All is nonsens, my friend...poor efficiency, poor temperature stability, big distortion, big input capacity...stay on earth
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Krakow
|
Quote:
yes, indeed, class A has poor efficiency! Quote:
not so poor! Quote:
only low output impedance preamp is needed! Quote:
what??? where??? did you see the graphs? I think this is very good result for non global NFB circuit!! I could bet that the sound will be better than in conventional circuits (GNFB). Quote:
sorry I cannot better join my heaven
__________________
regards, Pawel |
|||||
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
I wouldn't say nonsens but as Pavel is in to: What are the good properties and what are the bad?
I can't find very much good, can you help me here?
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Krakow
|
Quote:
but good: 1. low distortion 2. good harmonic character 3. simplicity 4. relatively high power as for a class A not much? maybe. sending this circuit on the forum I was curious about possible improovments proposed by the members. I do not think that it is a top I thought that it will be a nice gift for the tests and improovments, but does not? anyway, during this weekend I am going to build it!
__________________
regards, Pawel |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
|
High input capacity? Note that these parts are used as followers, Cgs does not come into equation. Driven with a decent frontend, this is not an issue.
Btw, Padamiecki, take the IRF610 and 9610 for input, they have even much lower capacitance. Also, I think you should use IRFP240/9140 for output, not the other way around. They are a better complement. It would be maybe better to feed the input FET's with a constant current source (replace R1+R2 with ccs), that way the source resistors will drop a more constant voltage. Thermal stability should be OK, when you fit the input FET's to the same heatsink as the output FET's. P-A, "why a MOS-FET diamond buffer?" I may ask you, why a BJT diamond buffer? In both cases, I find it an elegant way to bias the output stage, while at the same time having the current boost of a driver stage. Btw, regarding efficiency: This is better efficiency than using a source follower driver stage. You can swing closer to the rails. Go for it, Padamiecki, and report the results. Tino |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Krakow
|
__________________
regards, Pawel |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
Maybe I should ask what are you going to use it for?
Which currents do you have in mind? EDIT: 1.7 A Wow. A few possible drawbacks: Lower transconductance => more distortion, higher output impedance Unpredictable Vgs, needs carefull matching Very unlinear capacitance behavoiur => distortion maybe Lot's of output offset (may not be a problem though) Much more temperature coefficient, -10 mV/ deg vs. -2 mV/deg Much more input capacitance, possibility to reduced bandwidth. If you really want to know, just do some P2P experimenting. ![]() I maybe be totally wrong you know.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Diamond Buffer - Super Buffer | peranders | Solid State | 34 | 16th May 2010 01:46 PM |
| diamond buffer for car project | djronbxs | Solid State | 0 | 17th November 2007 01:06 PM |
| Lateral mosfet w Normal or Diamond buffer? | fab | Solid State | 22 | 8th June 2007 04:23 PM |
| Diamond buffer in PIMETA | slowpogo | Chip Amps | 3 | 19th April 2007 05:58 AM |
| Diamond buffer | peranders | Solid State | 45 | 15th November 2003 11:00 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11291 seconds (79.89% PHP - 20.11% MySQL) with 11 queries |