|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Left Coast
|
I'm aware of the reasons ceramic disc cap should be avoided in the signal path (but may be unavoidable in other locations).
However, in browsing the Digi-Key catalog (an activity which the which spouse thinks is majorly wierd) I notice several variations on cermic caps such as "monolithic", "layered" etc. Should these be catagorized pretty much the same as the more common ceramic disc or do they have properties that are sufficiently different that they are in a separate category? If so are those properties of any interest from an audio point of view. This is hardly an urgent question, I just want to satisfy my curiosity. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
|
I would generally characterize monolithic or multilayer ceramics as better than discs for virtually all applications (excepting perhaps high voltage?), but they probably have limited value in analog audio applications.
There are so many variables with ceramic caps, including gross construction (disc/multilayer/single layer); individual manufacturer's form factor, construction and termination choices; and the many dielectrics available. The characteristics of NPO, X7R, Y5V, Z5U, F, Taiyo Yuden's low-distortion "SD", etc all lead to very different capacitors. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
This topic is very interesting but from a professional view. I have tried to study the pros and cons of different dielectrics. I use XR7 always as decoupling capacitors (SMD) and I can't see the real difference between the types as long as you are not going to use them in critical places.
If we talk small caps (<1nF) I don't see why I not should use NP0.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me Tube Buffered Gainclone in work |Thread |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
|
http://www.vishay.com/products/capac...l_ceramic.html
http://www.vishay.com/brands/vitramon/main.html http://www.capacitors.com/pickcap/pickcap.htm I would avoid ceramic caps for anything but high frequency decoupling of digital circuits as they can sound quite nasty. I would use COG(NP0) if I had to use a ceramic cap at all. Art |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Left Coast
|
I saw a table somewhere that listed caps by bandwidth. Ceramics were the only ones that went into the Ghz range. The next category down (one of the "poly'") went to 500Mhz. So I suppose that if you really need to be sure a cap is effective at those frequencies, ceramics would be the way to go.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| X7R vs NP0/C0G Ceramic Caps | speakerguy79 | Parts | 4 | 6th March 2007 11:52 PM |
| Replacing ceramic caps by MKP?? | Duck-Twacy | Solid State | 6 | 21st July 2003 11:22 PM |
| ESP P68, 500v ceramic caps? | Kram | Parts | 1 | 10th June 2003 09:00 PM |
| Replacing ceramic caps - do or don't? | Cradle22 | Solid State | 4 | 16th March 2003 12:39 PM |
| Replacing ceramic disc caps with silver mica caps? | G | Solid State | 5 | 18th November 2002 01:02 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |