HP 208A Oscillator, any use??

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Just another Moderator
Joined 2003
Paid Member
Hi,

I've discovered the limitations of my sound card for testing my amp... good for using with rmaa, and simple sine waves up to about 8Khz but absolutely hopeless for square waves, and anything above about 8Khz....

I can get a HP 208A test oscillator for $95 Aus, but I can't find any info on it, all I have is "Generates from 5Hz to 500kHz into 600ohm" I don't know if it can do square waves, and I'm a bit concerned about the "into 600 ohms"..... anyone use one of these?

search on HP 208A turned up zip!

Tony.
 
Yep, zilch, unless you are willing to buy a manual!

If it says oscillator, it probably is just that. You can tie a high-speed comparator circuit to its output to get square waves, though to get exactly 50% duty cycle may require some tweaking of the reference voltages.

600ohms should be a very useable impedance to work with, why is it a worry?

Cheers
 
Just another Moderator
Joined 2003
Paid Member
Thanks Clem_o,

wasn't sure about the 600 ohms was thinking about the input impedance of preamps, being in the 10's of K ohms, I guess that 600 ohms is the minimum impeadance it will drive, higher is ok :)

I sent an email to the seller to find out if it has any square wave output :)

Tony.
 
I don't know the 208 off the top of my head, but generally if it says oscillator it is just for sine waves.

The ones that produce sine and square and maybe even triangle are more often called signal generators or audio generators. Also you would probably be happy with a function generator. Those will not only make the sine, square, and triangle forms, but usually will also do sweeps, pulses, and DC offset, and even duty cycle on the square waves.
 
Just another Moderator
Joined 2003
Paid Member
thanks jaycee, interesting device :) I'll see what I can dig up! little pricy at $52 Aus, but when you look at the price of a new function generator it's pretty cheap, especially if as it says, you need minimal external components.

Tony.
 
Yep, MAXIM may be generous... :)

If I recall, there's several function generator chips on the market, XR2206 comes to mind. Probably cheaper but the sine-wave distortion is just horrible, since the chip actually generates triangle waves; a bunch of diode-resistor pairs are used to mash the wave into something sinusoidal!! In general, function gens don't seem to have particularly good specs as far as sine-wave distortion is concerned. May be a reason why HP has a specialized "sine wave only" product...

Oh one other thing comes to mind - Linear Technology did put out an article or two on the design of a really low distortion sine-wave generator, written by Jim Williams. I think the articles are available on their website...
 

PRR

Member
Joined 2003
Paid Member
> I can get a HP 208A test oscillator for $95 Aus, but I can't find any info on it, all I have is "Generates from 5Hz to 500kHz into 600ohm" I don't know if it can do square waves, and I'm a bit concerned about the "into 600 ohms"..... anyone use one of these?

I never met that guy, but he is surely son to the 200AB, the box that Mr H and Mr P built in their garage after studying under Prof Terman. Started a dynasty. A mainstay of the audio industry for 20 years.

Tuned 200ABs will make MUCH cleaner sinewaves than any function generator. The 8038 FG chip says as good as 1% but it is a very ugly kink-wave. A 200AB will always be under 0.5% and the flaws are smooth, invisible on the scope. Tweaked 200s can get below 0.05%. However they only go 20CPS-200KC (20CPS-40KC on the high-power model).

A 200AB will cleanly drive any load from ~200 ohms to infinity. The output impedance is 60 to 100 ohms (rises at the high frequencies) so if you load it hard the output varies a bit: for precision response measurement you put a voltmeter on the 200 and keep it flat. (WHen it was invented, Gain Sets were still common.)

A 200AB does not do square waves: why would it? OK, square testing did get common later. But we usually used dedicated square sources: putting a Schimdt inside a low-distortion sine generator is begging for trouble. My Heath had a square-wave but I sometimes had to un-power that section to get really clean sine waves. FWIW: the Heath also made rated output in 600 ohms, but would drive from a few hundred to infinity ohms just fine.

The 208 clearly has a wider frequency range. I bet the output is ample for any pro line level work (and more than you need for testing sound cards and hi-fi amps). It would not be markedly "less" than the 200AB.

A hundred bucks in Good Working Order is probably fair: I can find 200ABs from US and German test-gear recalibration shops, $49 working but not calibrated and a not-DOA warranty. If you were in the right place when your local engineering school retired their analog-lab gear, you could get working 200ABs for $5 and "dead" (blown pilot light) for $2 or free.

The 200AB is vacuum-tube: the main fault is gummy grease in the tuning shaft (I had to hammer one apart to oil it) but after that they are heir to all the firebottle failings and fixes. I bet that 208 is transistor: my vintage H-P tranny gear needed a good switch-contact cleaning but otherwise everything is perfect. From what I have seen of H-Ps transistor designs, if it does get sick it could be a real headache to figure out.
 
Just another Moderator
Joined 2003
Paid Member
Thanks PRR :) sounds like the 200AB is the benchmark sine wave generator, and a very important device history wise!!

I've had a bit of a look to see if I could find any info from hp, but they don't seem to have a web site for their test gear, I'm wondering if they have stopped making test gear and concentrate only on printers and computers.....

I might ask a friend who works at a UNI here in Sydney to keep an eye out for "upgrades", might be able to pick up a signal generator and a cro at the same time :)

Tony.
 

PRR

Member
Joined 2003
Paid Member
> wondering if they have stopped making test gear and concentrate only on printers and computers.....

H-P made some nice mid-size computers, and the HPIB Bus allowed their many test-boxes to be lashed together to automate testing. So when chip computers came along, they made the HP80, a cute little personal computer. One thing led to another, the PC racket out-grew the rest of the company, yet was in a cut-throat business and bleeding money. On the other side, the test-gear racket was still profitable and strong. So they got a divorce. "The" H-P (the test-gear racket) became "Agilent", and the PC racket became the low-price box at BestBuys and other mega-marketers, keeping the fine H-P name.

However Agilent does not seem to archive manuals for stuff more than a few years old, and not even all the recent stuff.

Hmmmm... the current H-P site does tout the story of the H-P 200 oscillator. Started 1938. In 1940, gave $3 to charity. The patent was granted in 1942. In 1952 H and P bought a new wing for Stanford's EE labs. I don't know how much a wing costs, but I know it can cost a million bucks to get my name on a significant existing college building.

Dang if I can find anything about the 208A except that Oakley has one for AUS$95 and several US and Canada manual-shops list it at $35-$40. It isn't a phantom product but sure isn't common.
 
@wintermute:

HP200 series are very similar, so this might help you:

1. go to bama.sbc.edu.
2. read the instructuions and download a hp204 etc. manual for free.

The hp20x series are very nice and reliable. I am shure you will like these oscillators.

BTW: check my reply on your thread "scope needed" please. TIA

hth,
Andreas
 
Just another Moderator
Joined 2003
Paid Member
cool site thanks Andreas :)

I downloaded a manual for the 206A even that model is a valve one!! Looks pretty straight forward.

I bought a 555 timer IC today and will have a crack at making a square wave generator. Saw a kit in jaycar today and it looked like it could generate a clean square wave to at least 12Khz.... found a circuit this afternoon :)

the sine wave generator could still be a good option, I'm uncertain whether the trianguation I see on the sound card (when using truerta) is due to it not producing a clean sine wave, or not being able to do enough samples when looping it back...

Tony.
 
Administrator
Joined 2004
Paid Member
Hi Tony,
Get a good sine wave generator. The HP is good. Other good generators were/are made by Leader. I use a LAG120B for day to day stuff. I built some fixed frequency wien bridge oscillators for really low THD measurements. You should be able to find LAG120A or LAG120B used.

They want too much for good working HP oscillators around Toronto and I liked the smaller Leader unit (bought a few new for my shop).

-Chris
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.