Dead Dynaco Stereo 400 - Opinions - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 19th September 2002, 04:08 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
mrfeedback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Perth, Australia.
Default Dead Dynaco Stereo 400 - Opinions

I had a dead Dynaco Stereo 400 power amp fall into my lap today.
This amp did years of service as a mobile DJ amp, and then sat on a shelf for years.
A quick probing revealed s/c output transistors and maybe drivers too.
Questions - What are good replacement outputs and drivers for this amp (MJ15003/4, MJ15024/25 etc) ?.
Do the carbon composition resistors give much trouble ?.

What are these amps like when running factory new by todays standards (good, bad or ugly ?), and any improvements worthwhile doing ?.

Thanks, Eric.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2002, 06:08 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
mrfeedback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Perth, Australia.
BTW it is a Dynaco Stereo 400 Mk1

Eric.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2002, 06:12 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: wheeling illinois
Even 25 years later these units sound fairly decent.
Just repaired one i blew the crap out of a few months ago.

Even if only one output transistor is dead you should replace
all of them. While you are at it, replace all the electrolytics
on the driver boards.

All of the transistors are still available...
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2002, 06:23 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
mrfeedback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Perth, Australia.
"All of the transistors are still available..."

Yeah - where and how much ?.

Eric.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2002, 12:58 PM   #5
djk is online now djk
diyAudio Member
 
djk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA
James Bongiorno, the designer of this amp, suggests using 2SB595/2SD525 as drivers and MJ21193/MJ21194 for outputs with MJ15024/MJ15025 as alternate outputs.

Or you can re-drill the heatsink to be a 416, and double the number of outputs. The 416 drives 2 ohms. The ultimate upgrade would be to drill the sink for a 416 and use Leach boards.

http://users.ece.gatech.edu/~mleach/lowtim/

The original 2N5631/2N6031 outputs had to be series connected because they only had 50W SOA at 100V. Because the MJ21193/MJ21194 have 200W SOA at 100V they can be parallel connected.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2002, 04:05 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
mrfeedback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Perth, Australia.
Default New Millenium Upgrade ?

Hi djk, thanks for the good info.
I have not seriously studied this machine beyond a quick diagnosis session whilst the customer was watching , and I figured that for circa 1975... the output transistors are not as tough as some modern examples.
Devices like "2SB595/2SD525 as drivers and MJ15024/MJ15025 as alternate outputs." - these are easy and economical for me to get, so that route sounds good to me.
2 ohm output capability is also a must in my books, and thanks for the pointer to the 416 which I did not know about.
Fitting Leach boards is probably more of a round tuit project, but tempting never the less given the very suitable chassis, transformer, heatsink and layout of this old school engineering school mass production example.
This can be a quite serious horsepower amp as standard or modified.
I am the ultimate subjectiveist at heart, but a repairs technician/realist during the day time, so the cost/sound relationship is often skewed in the cost/reliability direction.
Please tell me if I'm wrong, but a renovate to SMPS low esr signal/bypass caps, and new output and driver transistors ought to bring it up to something reasonably decent, for LF at least.

Eric.

IME physically heavy amps just sound better.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2002, 05:29 PM   #7
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 5
Default Re: New Millenium Upgrade ?

I was never particularily impressed with this amp. It was one of the best big amps of the day (which is why we sold many - i even built some of the kits), but didn't sound anywhere as good as smaller amps of the day. PS Audio, NAIMs, Amber, Adire... i even preferred the Quad 303.

So when you fix it keep in mind mods. Allen Wright reports that during his early days in Oz to having made a living tweaking such as these with things like CCS...

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2002, 07:13 PM   #8
Variac is offline Variac  United States
diyAudio Editor
 
Variac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Francisco, USA
I''ve got a Hafler 220 with one channel out.
I suspect that the repair bill will exceed $75

With the price of heatsinks and cases i'm beginning to think I would be better off gutting it and putting in 6 inverting gain clones instead. Hmmmmm WAIT!! I'll check the power supply output If it works for the clones, that amp is doomed!!

Dave, you think the clones would sound better?
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2002, 11:20 PM   #9
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 5
Quote:
Originally posted by Variac
With the price of heatsinks and cases i'm beginning to think I would be better.

Dave, you think the clones would sound better?
I have 2 DH200s, and am part way towards making 2 100W monoblocs out of them by removing a channel from each -- one of the commercial mods was to swap in a trafo with 2x the VA rating.

IIRC the rails are a little high for a gain klone -- at least using the usual suspects.

It is a tough call on this one. Do you have a use for a single 100W channel?

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2002, 03:55 AM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
mrfeedback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Perth, Australia.
Dave, yes I am suspicious that these are not as clean and fine as other amps of the period on first inspection.
This amp looks like Bose 901 territory really.
I have emailed Allen Wright and hopefully I can get some detailed info on the mods that he has made.

Eric.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dynaco Stereo 400 Amp andrew01 Solid State 5 19th June 2011 02:33 PM
Dynaco Stereo 70 amplifier Original Burnedfingers Tubes / Valves 231 30th December 2009 01:45 AM
Wanted Dynaco Stereo 70 Original Burnedfingers Swap Meet 3 9th December 2007 10:45 AM
Ariels + Dynaco Stereo 70=? CamMan595 Multi-Way 8 20th August 2007 11:50 PM
Need Help: Dynaco Stereo 120 amp jainbaby Solid State 4 18th December 2002 01:03 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:37 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2