|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#561 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vác, Hungary
|
Yes, I had lot of work, so there was not too much time for the amplifier.
So here is the schematic, but I don't remember the values of the compensating network, due it was set during the measuring with scope. I use only the RC between the collectors of the input stage. sajti |
|
|
|
|
#562 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Zagreb
|
Quote:
Use artwork as viewed from the COMPONENT side. This way, when it is printed, the printed side will get in contact with the photosensitized PCB material, and there will be no gap due to paper or transparency thickness. The gap is responsible for difraction effects which limits the precision of artwork youc an use, even if it prints out correctly. Using this method I've done lines as thin as 8 mils (though you do need to correct somewhat n the artwork, i.e. make the lnes thicker by about 2 mil, since the photosensitive lacquer also has thickness and some diffraction). Try printing on drafting cellulose transparency (pauspapier). The trick here is that it too has two sides, one slightly smother, though the difference is not great, and important only if you want to do truly thin lines. It also expands quite a bit when heated up. In the laser printer, teh heating and rolling through the rollers expoands it a lot in th elongitudinal direction. Whenever I get a new batrch of paper from a previously unknown maker, I 'calibrate' it by printing a long 'PCB' of known length on it, then measure and correct in the PCB program (most have correction factors for printing). The trick to getting tru black comes in the form of acrylic protection lackuer. Not sure if and where it can be found outside Europe (I mean the one I use and know that it works), but Mike will surely know it: it's 'Plastic Spray' from Contact Chemie. What you do with it is the following: have it handy as well as a hair dryer. As soon as the transparency comes out of the printer, put it on a larger sheet of paper and spray it thinly with this 'Plastic Spray'. Count to about 10-15, then slowly dry it with the hair dryer (don't bake it, dry it holding the dryer about 30-50cm away). Don't ask me how I came up with that one, i don't remember Finallr, get a good black marker and carefully retouch the large ares as these will not be completely black. Usually doing so on the back side of the artwork is enough, though best results are when done on both sides. Check for 'holes' against a window or something (ideally, a 'lighted table' such as used for checking photographs would be used. Exposing works just fone using regular flourescent light (!), even the low power electronic bulbs will do fine, though the 'bluish white' nasty ones are actually the best. The best way I have found of doing this is to get a piece of glass (with rounded edges, you don't want t o cut yourself!), put the presensitized PCB copper up on a nice flat surface, then put the artwork print DOWN (in contact woth the copper) on the PCB and put t he glass on top. Typically it takes about 7-8 minutes from 25cm away woh a 11W fluorescent bulb mounted in a table light for me. I also have an exposure box built for the purpose, where the light source is in a ventilated box (uses a small fan), with a glass top surface, the glass is about 8mm thick and sits on small rubber spacers which enable the air to be sucked from the top edges of the glass and down into the box, and out the exhaust fan, to cool the 80W mercury bulb in there. Without the fan convection heats up the glass and PCB unacceptably. In this case, the artwork goes onto the glass, print up, the PCB goes on top of that copper down, and I normally put a big thick databook and a large surplus transformer on top of that to get really good contact between PCB and artwork. This is how I did the 8 mil line width PCBs... I also calibrated the lighting process, by using a small piece of PCB and artwork with a set of lines and spaces drawn in parallel, with thickness from 30 mils down to about 10. I covered that with black paper and just kept moving it about a cm every half a minute to expose more and more of the artwork to light. When developed, check for best line and space rendition, and get the time from the distance on the PCB where it appears Developement is using NaOh. I don't use a pre-mixed solution as I have found there is quite a lot of tolerance from board to board. What I do is, i dissolve as many pellets of dessicated NaOh as I can in about half a liter of tap water, and put about a liter or so of tap water into the developing tub, and then put the exposed PCB in it. I add a little of teh concentrated solution at a time and stirr a lot, untill I can see the developing process start. Ittakes a bit of fine tuning to get it going perfectly. The idea is, in the end you have well over a liter of 'tuned' solution, which youc an store and re-use. It tends to work just fine untill teh solutiomn becomes almost the color of coke I do my etching with HCl (hydrochloric acid) and H2O2 (Hydrogen peroxide). Both are about 20-25% concentration and I use them because I can get them cheap - one is used for sanitary cleaning, the opther in swimming pools. Again, you start with just the acid and the PCB in it, and SLOWLY little by littel add the peroxide at the edge of the tub (NOT over the PCB!!!) and stirr profusely. At some point, you will start seeing very thin 'layers' of exposed copper washed away as you rock the tub making a 'wave' down the length of it and over the PCB. This is the perfect concentration. Beware that too much peroxide results in a rather spectaculairly quick etching solution, that also heats up and will destroy the PCB. Also, do this OUTSIDE, as you get chlorine gas as a result of the tching, DO NOT breathe in close to the tub! It is very corrosive and therefore dangerous. Fortunately it is heavyer than air and will stay on the ground. I've also done this in a semi-covered tub (tupperware I drill teh holes with the photoresist still on, as this protects the copper from being oxidated by fingertips. When I'm done, I put the board into the concentrated NaOh to strip off the photoresist, then it goes into VERY diluted hydrochloric acid (like a few drops of it in 1dl of water) and is dried, and immediately coated with solder varnish (flux dissolved in a spirit of some sort). It does not come off until everything is soldered on, at which ooint the board is cleaned from any soldering residue and that 'plastic spray' is sprayed over it to prevent corrosion. |
|
|
|
|
|
#563 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gütersloh
|
Hi ilimzn !
Phew, what a great explanation ! Maybe you really should post that in the WIKI ? Yes, i used the printed side down onto the copper, but i have not tried yet the transparent paper ! And i did not know the trick with the "plastic spray"... Need to try that ! I used the transparency-spray from Contact Chemie, this makes the paper more/very transparent to UV-light. Yes, for developing i also use NaOH, the trick is to find the correct concentration... The HCl and H2O2 is now getting difficult to buy, after the bombing in London. I still have some left together with a 3rd chemical, but for a very different purpose... Yes, i should be old enough to stop that... I use the Natriumperoxid as i can easily reuse it, i fill it into a bottle and heat it up again when i need it again. Important hint: open up the bottle once a week or so, to let out the gases... And the FeClO3 is simply ugly... I also keep the photoresist until i start soldering, but i used alcohol and a toothbrush to clean it, the same i use for removing the flux after soldering. Big thanks for these informations, saved that on my harddisk ! What PCBs do you use ? I use Bungard-PCBs. Mike |
|
|
|
|
#564 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Prague, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka
|
Dónde está Carlos?
|
|
|
|
|
#565 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Athens, Greece
|
Symasym 5 prototype finished. One channel, parts were placed as in PCB and connected point to point. PS voltage is 2x32V. It worked flawlessly from the beginning. DC offset is 3.5 mV. Small transistors were matched with DMM. BC550C instead of MPSA18 at the input.
First impressions are very good, I will soon make PCBs for two channels. Mr Mike Bittner, I think you should be proud about this amplifier Though I 'd like to have both channels with PCBs (and better capacitors and resistors) to make a more valid evaluation, I must say that from the beginning the most profound characteristics of this amp are dynamism and extraordinary detail in all frequences. I must also say that this is the first time that my speaker gave me correct, good, rythmic, controlled bass. Minuses? Perhaps a little hard high frequnces? Or maybe I imagine things, or perhaps with all these ceramic capacitors all over and common resistors one cannot expect everything perfect Have a nice day....
__________________
Dimitris |
|
|
|
|
#566 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gütersloh
|
Hi Dimitris,
welcome to the club ! And thanks for the compliments... Nice to hear that it worked at once without problems and that you are pleased with the result ! About the harsh sounding, it shouldn't be, my latest version got rid of any sign of harsh sounding. My latest changes were adding the 10ohms between signalgnd and powergnd, the wire connecting the gndpins of the supplycaps, and replacing the last ceramic-cap with a mica. It's good possible that the use of ceramics cause harsh sounding. The bc550c instead of the mpsa18 should not have big effect. Are all components exactly the values from schematic ? There is one thing i see on your photo and might be a problem, your outputdevices ! What are they ? They are no MJLs, the right one looks like a Toshiba, but the left one ??? I was wondering because of the different packaging between npn and pnp... Mike |
|
|
|
|
#567 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Prague, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka
|
Regarding harsh sound - I would suspect CD player or preamplifier (if used), the symasym amp might have discovered problem hidden by not so accurate amplifier before.
|
|
|
|
|
#568 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Prague, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#569 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vác, Hungary
|
Quote:
My PCB is the 2nd version. I have to modify the 1st, because of small hum, generated by the PSU. And this PCB contains all parts including the PSU capacitors, and the 4 output devices... sajti |
|
|
|
|
|
#570 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Dear Sajti,
the RL circut in the output need to be after the Zobel-circut! Regards, |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13238 seconds (59.48% PHP - 40.52% MySQL) with 11 queries |