|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Sin Bin
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Budapest
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Of course there is. Distortion and source Z are reduced in proportion to gain in common emitter.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Sin Bin
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Budapest
|
Thanks, although I asked only yes/no answer.
Then next question: Is it neccessary to lead back every circuit to common emitter configuration, or is it allowed to calculate simple way? (I think it is relevant the statement by Einstein: Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler.) |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Warsaw
|
1st:yes
2nd:? |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Brazil
|
First: yes
Second: can you state it more clearly? |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Sin Bin
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Budapest
|
I try, but I don't know the english technical terminations (or what the heck).
A transistor can be described as 2 gate(?). For example: 1'st gate: base-emitter, 2'nd gate: collector-emitter. There are network equations, for example: u1=h11*i1+h12*u2 i2=h21*i1+h22*u2 This is the most common, but not the only way! It can be done with common base or common collector too! My 2'nd question: is there any reason to universally prefer one of these, instead of stereotype? I think there is a reason, why is it useful to use the appropiate one, when circuit can be analized simpler with it. To be continued, actual example come soon! |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
|
Yes. There's 100% local feedback in this topology.
With zero beefback, neither local nor global, the gain would be infinite
__________________
Just remember: in theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice it usually is quite a bit difference... Bob Pease |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Prague, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hungary
|
voltage ?
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Prague, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka
|
Yes, a "textbook" example of the voltage feedback.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DIY pre-amp kit vote | cryo | Tubes / Valves | 30 | 4th May 2011 04:47 AM |
| Off Topic USA **VOTE!** | mikee55 | The Lounge | 2 | 4th November 2008 11:35 AM |
| Vote NOW for a globe TJ meshplate 45. | jusbe | Tubes / Valves | 7 | 18th September 2003 11:35 PM |
| DIY Vote | vdi_nenna | Everything Else | 2 | 17th October 2001 06:31 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10142 seconds (75.08% PHP - 24.92% MySQL) with 10 queries |