|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Toronto
|
Ok so 2 questions.
Which is the best internal soundcard to use complete i.e digital to analog all internal, for say under 500 dollars. And which is the best card to use if you are going to just use it as a 'feeder' card to an external DAC or processor to DAC type config. Pretty straight forward questions that i think can be answered succinctly since it is an opinion poll.
__________________
Persistence is better then intelligence. Unless persistence kills you. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Left Coast
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Toronto
|
WWW.zzsounds.com
And man i did not know the Turtle Beach Sanata Cruz was so highly regarded. Its right up there in the top 15 'gold' cards. The Audigy 2 didnt make the list. ( there is a link to a comparison test page ) http://www.digitalaudio.com/DIGITAL...S=75&PubID=4401 Doesnt seem to work from my cut and paste link. Just click the link in post above and then middle left on new page is comparison link.
__________________
Persistence is better then intelligence. Unless persistence kills you. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Left Coast
|
I think the Audigy may suffer too many bells and whistles. I was trying to use one for audio testing with RightMark and it got to be a real nuisance because it was difficult to get it to do simple A to D without mixer software being active. It made the results ambiguos.
I think it is probably great for gamers, and people who want to mix tracks etc. Straight playback from a CD seems pretty good too. I read a published review that says 24/192 mode gets you a higher THD figure than 24/96, which is the same result I got. I suspect 24/192 maybe accomplished in software somehow rather than hardware and I think the main purpose is compatability with Dolby 5.1 when playing a DVD. Anyway I like the Santa Cruz better because it is more straight forward to use in testing and the playback THD figure though a bit higher are respectable (<.005) |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Toronto
|
You have one , nice. Playing CD rips from your pc , do you feel that there was a difference in the quality of the DAC compared to the Audigy 2 ?
__________________
Persistence is better then intelligence. Unless persistence kills you. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: HTPC, Bit-Perfect Computer Transport, Small PC with a great soundcard | wigginjs | Swap Meet | 8 | 30th September 2009 07:40 AM |
| CD player vs. computer soundcard | youyoung21147 | Digital Source | 65 | 18th May 2005 11:11 AM |
| Uppgrading the analog stages of a computer soundcard? | demogorgon | Analogue Source | 24 | 6th January 2005 07:27 PM |
| I2S from computer's soundcard? | dc | Digital Source | 4 | 14th October 2003 01:03 AM |
| High end Computer soundcard ? | Henckel | Digital Source | 22 | 7th March 2003 04:25 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08181 seconds (73.08% PHP - 26.92% MySQL) with 10 queries |