|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: near Milano , Italy
|
Hello,
after a long time I finally managed to bring my active x-over project closer to conclusion. It is based on the MOX boards from the first group buy and it uses a pair of ALW boards for the Jung super regulator. The supply is taken from a dual 15V 100VA toroid, each secondary is rectified with Fairchild Stealth diodes, smoothed with 4700 uF / 40V Siemens Sikorel caps and feeds a super-regulator. Being the secondaries dual the supplies are floating and need to be referenced to each other. Looking at ALW's guide I see that the recommended wiring for multiple loads is like this:
__________________
I don't believe in audiophile components - except when I can get them at frugal-phile(tm) prices |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: near Milano , Italy
|
... however this would mean that I should join the V+ and V- "ground" wires at each of the MOX boards and this maybe is not the best solution so far.... did anyone experience a similar problem?
With the gainclone regulated supply it is suggested to join the "gnd" wires close to the amps and to go from there to the boards... if this better? Cheers Andrea
__________________
I don't believe in audiophile components - except when I can get them at frugal-phile(tm) prices |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Croatia
|
Hi Andrea,
I used the wiring diagram shown in the picture below (standard regs instead of Jungs) a couple of times with good results. Regards, Milan |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: near Milano , Italy
|
thanks Milan,
I was also thinking about using a similar layout, but I was wondering if there is a "optimal" solution for Jung-like regulators. Cheers Andrea
__________________
I don't believe in audiophile components - except when I can get them at frugal-phile(tm) prices |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
|
optimal and the easiest to implement would be 1 reg per board
__________________
Just remember: in theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice it usually is quite a bit difference... Bob Pease |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: near Milano , Italy
|
Quote:
Cheers Andrea
__________________
I don't believe in audiophile components - except when I can get them at frugal-phile(tm) prices |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Super Regulator | TheDriver | Parts | 2 | 21st July 2008 10:54 AM |
| Lithos regulator - A new super regulator? | peranders | Parts | 7 | 8th May 2008 02:01 PM |
| AD797 and Super Regulator | Onvinyl | Solid State | 11 | 5th September 2007 05:08 PM |
| Super Regulator for DAC | rockytro | Digital Source | 11 | 19th May 2006 07:31 PM |
| wiring Super Leach amp | supernet | Solid State | 0 | 25th April 2002 05:08 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11342 seconds (66.90% PHP - 33.10% MySQL) with 11 queries |