|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
The following circuit appeared in the design ideas section of EDN:
![]() the description can be found here: http://a330.g.akamai.net/7/330/2540/...es/60905di.pdf |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Zagreb
|
Q2 is not going to live very long...
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Netherlands
|
Insert a resistor in the base of Q2 to protect it.
Steven
__________________
The Analog Art shows no sign of yielding to the Dodo's fate. The emergence and maturation of monolithic processing finesse has perhaps lagged a bit behind the growth of the Binary Business. But whereas digital precision is forever bounded by bits, there is no limit excepting Universal Hiss to the ultimate accuracy and functional variety of simple analog circuits. - Barry Gilbert, 1973 |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Zagreb
|
Of course - my point was, it's rather strange for a specialised magazine to publish this not noticing such an obvious mistake, let alone in such a simple circuit.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
they do print corrections at EDN
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: May 2005
Location: none
|
I don't know why Q2 will be killed - I think Q1 has a better chance of getting killed.
The "flaw" in the design is that the voltage drop over Q1 is always Vbe of Q2, and if there is a lot of current going through Q1, it will get hold quickly. Also, the design would be a lot more interesting if it is done on N-channels. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
Guys, I'll guess you don't have notice that this mosfet is connected backwards (we use this also at work) and the circuit may not need any gate resistors. This has to be determined from case to case.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Therez no base current limit for Q1..in a practical circuit any short or overload will damage Q1 ......
__________________
SivanandBalan |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: California Republic
|
You may have Vgs breakdown for the kind of voltage solid-state amp will see.
Q2 is fine. It should turn Q1 off fast enough before its base-emitter junction melts. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: May 2005
Location: none
|
Quote:
are you sure about that? |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| inrush current limiter circuit | Holger Barske | Elektor | 12 | 14th October 2006 10:34 PM |
| short-circuit protection in mosfet's amp...?? | csl113 | Solid State | 8 | 31st January 2005 06:10 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10069 seconds (73.34% PHP - 26.66% MySQL) with 11 queries |