YAAXOQ (yet another active crossover question) - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd June 2005, 03:07 PM   #1
wxn is offline wxn  Lithuania
diyAudio Member
wxn's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vilnius
Default YAAXOQ (yet another active crossover question)

Active crossovers are actively discussed but I have not found any directions on module arrangement.

Look at the attached picture. Until today I've planned the serial way, designed neat HP/LP crossover modules etc. But then I started to question myself. That's what I came up with:

Serial arrangement
neat structure
possibly higher distortion due to number of active elements in signal path

Parallel arrangment:
possibly lower distortion
not so modular (ie modules and wiring become a bit more complex)
possible phase incoherencies (not sure about this one)

So, which approach is better in Your opinion and why?
Attached Images
File Type: gif xo.gif (15.7 KB, 87 views)
Nothing is as simple as it seems
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd June 2005, 03:33 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
BobEllis's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Upstate NY
I tend to prefer what you describe as a parallel arrangement for the reason you stated as a con in the serial category - it has more active devices and potential distortion in the signal path. the M-T low pass does nothing for the woofer circuit, in typical corssovers the woofer is already down >30 dB by the M-T XO freq.

Also, the parallel arrangement makes phase compensation easier to do.

Note that Linkwitz does a little serial work in his active XO - incorporating baffle step compensation into his input buffer on his MT1 board, so that the tweeter gets the compensation, too. He also takes the tweeter from signal after the midrange's HP filter on his ASP (Orion XO) board. this is a departure from his early active XO articles in Speakerbuilder. In that article the tweeter XO was a standard 12db/octave dilter and a shelving 12 dB/octave filter from the Xo point to the tweeter resonant frequency, so that the acoustic slope would continue at 24 dB/octave. the current design seems to show that this was less important than he first thought, since he now has a second discontinuity in the tweeter's high pass slope.

From this I'd say that there is no single right way, just the one that works best for your application. With decent opamps and board design either configuration should work.
  Reply With Quote


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Active subwoofer crossover question? goldyrathore Subwoofers 4 1st January 2014 09:48 AM
Passive crossover into active crossover hahfran Multi-Way 16 10th February 2008 06:16 PM
Active crossover question annex666 Multi-Way 17 6th January 2005 11:16 AM
Grounding question regarding an active crossover Alcaid Parts 2 18th March 2004 02:31 PM
XVR1 active crossover, discrete active stage promitheus Pass Labs 18 22nd July 2002 01:29 AM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:56 AM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2017 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2