|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: May 2005
Location: none
|
I built this amp based on a N-channel quasi I did a very years ago, and then married it to the JLH front end.
Sonically it is very nice, and handles capacitive loads at ease (notice the 2uf cap on the output terminal), because of the current feedback. You can also run the traditional differential front end but need to use a higher miller cap (C8). I have fond that the design is quite insensitive to the choice of transistors and if you adjust R13, R14, and R15, you can also use bipolars as well. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: May 2005
Location: none
|
here is the 20khz driven into a 4ohm/2uf load network.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: May 2005
Location: none
|
schematic
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bangalore, India
|
Very good stability into a capacitive load.
Despite using dual rails, why is C3 (3300uF) required at the output?
__________________
Sam |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Earth
|
Hi tlf9999,
why not bias your input base from ground directly and run a variable resistor from the =ve supply to the feedback C at the emitter and adjust for DC offset. A little simpler. samuel Jayaraj, You're right - there's no need for the output C of3M3F, but I'll be damned if I can see how you evaluate stability on 20KHz sine - and in the dark as well! My hat's off to you. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bangalore, India
|
but I'll be damned if I can see how you evaluate stability on 20KHz sine (posted by amplifierguru)
I understand that it should have been a square wave test but there are too many amplifiers that will begin to oscillate even when passively connected to such a large reactive load, let alone being tested dynamically. Isn't the 'normal' output inductor there only to combat such capacitive loads? And how many of these (commercial) amps can safely be terminated with high capacitance cables, more so without the output inductor?
__________________
Sam |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: May 2005
Location: none
|
Quote:
I wouldn't run this on +/- rails without a DC servo. The DC offset does wonder more than if differential pairs are used on the front: about 30-40mv, similar to pretty much all current feedback amps I have used. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bangalore, India
|
Although Output Offset Voltage close to zero volts is desirable, upto 100mV should not normally be a problem. Remove the output cap and please report back.
__________________
Sam |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: May 2005
Location: none
|
it runs no problem without the cap.
here is the fft running 100Khz sine input and driving into a 4ohm/2p network, at about 90ma bias and 56v rails, without the output cap. it is mostly low-order harmonics (<7x), at about 0.4v. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: May 2005
Location: none
|
I also ran a version on NPN output devices (mjl21193 ?), with minor changes (driver resistors) to the original circuitry.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11604 seconds (70.58% PHP - 29.42% MySQL) with 10 queries |