my amp - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27th May 2005, 01:31 AM   #1
tlf9999 is offline tlf9999  United States
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: none
Default my amp

I built this amp based on a N-channel quasi I did a very years ago, and then married it to the JLH front end.

Sonically it is very nice, and handles capacitive loads at ease (notice the 2uf cap on the output terminal), because of the current feedback.

You can also run the traditional differential front end but need to use a higher miller cap (C8). I have fond that the design is quite insensitive to the choice of transistors and if you adjust R13, R14, and R15, you can also use bipolars as well.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg tlf1.jpg (67.8 KB, 600 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2005, 01:47 AM   #2
tlf9999 is offline tlf9999  United States
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: none
here is the 20khz driven into a 4ohm/2uf load network.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg tlf2.jpg (83.4 KB, 543 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2005, 01:49 AM   #3
tlf9999 is offline tlf9999  United States
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: none
schematic
Attached Images
File Type: jpg tlf1.jpg (67.8 KB, 595 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2005, 03:35 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bangalore, India
Very good stability into a capacitive load.

Despite using dual rails, why is C3 (3300uF) required at the output?
__________________
Sam
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2005, 03:56 AM   #5
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Earth
Hi tlf9999,

why not bias your input base from ground directly and run a variable resistor from the =ve supply to the feedback C at the emitter and adjust for DC offset. A little simpler.

samuel Jayaraj,

You're right - there's no need for the output C of3M3F, but I'll be damned if I can see how you evaluate stability on 20KHz sine - and in the dark as well! My hat's off to you.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2005, 09:41 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bangalore, India
but I'll be damned if I can see how you evaluate stability on 20KHz sine (posted by amplifierguru)

I understand that it should have been a square wave test but there are too many amplifiers that will begin to oscillate even when passively connected to such a large reactive load, let alone being tested dynamically. Isn't the 'normal' output inductor there only to combat such capacitive loads? And how many of these (commercial) amps can safely be terminated with high capacitance cables, more so without the output inductor?
__________________
Sam
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2005, 10:11 AM   #7
tlf9999 is offline tlf9999  United States
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: none
Quote:
Originally posted by Samuel Jayaraj
Despite using dual rails, why is C3 (3300uF) required at the output?
because the simulation was done with 0vdc negative rail.

I wouldn't run this on +/- rails without a DC servo. The DC offset does wonder more than if differential pairs are used on the front: about 30-40mv, similar to pretty much all current feedback amps I have used.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2005, 07:34 AM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bangalore, India
Although Output Offset Voltage close to zero volts is desirable, upto 100mV should not normally be a problem. Remove the output cap and please report back.
__________________
Sam
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2005, 10:10 AM   #9
tlf9999 is offline tlf9999  United States
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: none
it runs no problem without the cap.

here is the fft running 100Khz sine input and driving into a 4ohm/2p network, at about 90ma bias and 56v rails, without the output cap.

it is mostly low-order harmonics (<7x), at about 0.4v.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg tlf3.jpg (82.2 KB, 333 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th May 2005, 11:23 PM   #10
tlf9999 is offline tlf9999  United States
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: none
I also ran a version on NPN output devices (mjl21193 ?), with minor changes (driver resistors) to the original circuitry.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:07 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2