|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Flanders, Belgium
|
Hi all,
I've been testing for a while the amp I've build some weeks ago; and I'm very pleased with the results of it... But there are still a few questions left in my mind. The amp produce a very low sound (maybe because of the HUGE PSU); I thought I could help this by pulling up the higher and the medium frequencies by bypassing the bias diodes with a cap; but this had no effect on the sound. So what value do you recommend for this cap?? Are there any other solutions? (schematic below) I'm also building a pcb layout for my further amps, how thick should the tracks be? Are there any guidelines for this ? (i.e. ?? ampère => ?? mm thick) thank you all, HB. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Flanders, Belgium
|
hey thanks, it's a very usefull calculator!
HB. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ewersbach
|
When you mention "low sound" i think you mean the absence of high frequencies.
You can try to decrease the value of C4 (220 nF) ,because this one seems to be responsible for the negative feedback on high frequencies. But be careful.... if it's too low it may cause oscillations! regards Arne |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Flanders, Belgium
|
Yes, that's what I mean with the low sound; the sound is good when I turn (on my mixers equaliser) the low freq. to about a quarter of the range (of that potm.), the mid freq. turned to normal (= centre) and the higher freq. at full range.
If there's one thing left what I don't understand about the schematic, it's the function of C4; it's still in the design because this is in fact a modified amp (the design failed when I build it for the first time). I often don't see this cap in other designs, can I leave it away?? Because I left it away in the schematic for which I'm designing the pcb. thanks, HB. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA
|
C4=220nF? Surely you jest? 220pF would be a HUGE value for C4
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Flanders, Belgium
|
no sorry for that: those values are in pF, just a stupid thing in the program I use for the pcb designing.
HB. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hugo,
Still, 220pF is rather high, I would try 100pF or lower. Another thing I noted is the cap from the bottom of the bias diode string to the base of T5 I think it is. How large is that one? It does roll of the closed loop gain with frequency and could cause the effect you describe, but I can't read the value so don't know if it is significant. Jan Didden |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Flanders, Belgium
|
Jan,
I think you mean the cap between the collector and the emittor of T6, this one is 100pF. The value of the cap in parallel with the diode string is 1µF. HB. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hugo, no,
I mean the cap from the bottom of the diode string to the base of the right-hand transistor of the input LTP. Because the bottom of the diode string is for AC (almost) identical to the output voltage, this cap is effectively in parallel with the (10k?) feedback resistor, and therfore rolls off the closed loop gain with rising frequency. Jan Didden |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Practical PSE thinking. | Salas | Tubes / Valves | 10 | 8th December 2007 05:21 PM |
| Is this practical | tenderland | Tubes / Valves | 10 | 1st April 2006 02:56 AM |
| Practical use of 431 regulator | borges | Analogue Source | 2 | 20th February 2004 01:59 PM |
| is SMT practical for DIY? | dorkus | Solid State | 13 | 24th April 2002 02:34 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10215 seconds (77.64% PHP - 22.36% MySQL) with 11 queries |