Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17th January 2011, 01:14 PM   #81
diyAudio Member
 
tiefbassuebertr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: D-55629 Schwarzerden
Quote:
Originally Posted by dimitrij View Post
class A biasing for opamps seems a nice idea. I will give it a try for my new preamp that i'm gonna build soon.
A (maybe) stupid question: will it work also for power opamps?
I'm talking about LM1875 and similar devices.
Has anyone tried this yet?
If a voltage gain is absolutely necessary (e. g. in cases, where there is only a buffer stage with unity gain as power amplifier), then this is a very good idea.
In all the other cases (i. e. if the power amplifier uses voltage gain stage factors between 10 and 100) I would prefer discrete preamps with only one stage in the signal path (source follower e. g.) - for an example go to
http://www.passdiy.com/pdf/B1%20Buffer%20Preamp.pdf
or for more output current by use of multi-ampping systems
http://www.audiodesignguide.com/my/Follower_99c.gif
(use an idle current in such cases between 100mA and 200mA)
If there is a short connection to power amp with high input impedance above 20 K-Ohm, then I would prefer a passive pre-amp with only volume control and source select rotary switch.
check out therefore this thread:
Potentiometer Overview - Alps, Penny+Giles, TKD and Vishay and more, what's your fav?
most guys like for preamps circuits like this:
Jfet audio buffer
but I am not a friend of such topologies for the use in normal line stages applications where low gain factors realized.

Last edited by tiefbassuebertr; 17th January 2011 at 01:21 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th January 2011, 01:41 PM   #82
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
well, don't know about the sensing circuit, but i have a stereo LM1875
amp (based on datasheet circuit), but it looks to me that it does not boil at all.
mine is built with decent heatsink and runs very cool. I never
measured its temperature, but i'm sure it runs at around 40° C...

Unfortunately i'm not brave enough to test if we can increase its bias with
a resistor... (read: i'm not well aware of what will happen, so i don't want to risk to blow a beautiful sounding amp)

Last edited by dimitrij; 17th January 2011 at 02:03 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th January 2011, 01:51 PM   #83
ontoaba is offline ontoaba  Indonesia
diyAudio Member
 
ontoaba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Kudus, & Malang
Most OTA is class A, but all low open loop gain; (CA3060, LM13600). They has highest linearity at open loop.
LM13600 is buffer attached inside and could be instantly paralleled.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th January 2011, 02:36 PM   #84
diyAudio Member
 
janneman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Where Germany, The Netherlands and Belgium meet
Blog Entries: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewT View Post
I don't think so.

let's use a simplified example of an opamp that has the 3 stages of the Lin topology and the last stage is push pull.

The first stage draws Quiescent current Iq1
The second stage draws Quiescent current Iq2
The third push pull stage draws Quiescent current Iq3 = Ibias

Let's further assume that no other quiescent current is drawn by auxiliary circuits.
Iq1 & Iq2 could be feeding single ended ClassA stages.
The total quiescent current (Iq) is Iq1+Iq2+Iq3
The maximum ClassA output of the Lin amp is 2*Iq3
We have many combinations of varying current in the 3stages as the output current is increased towards IclassA max.

One must account for Iq1 & Iq2 before one can draw conclusions about IclassA max.

Then the opamp will have a non zero Iauxiliary. More complication

Opaq's method relies on the not unreasonable assumption that the rail currents of a ClassA amplifier follow the ClassA output current.
It appears he has detected the change in rail currents to include the half wave rectified versions of the ClassB output current.
Until now I had assumed that the bias current in an opa output stage would be about half the total supply current. OPAQ's results seem to indicate otherwise.
Anyway, an easy way to increase an opamp class A output current is to follow it with a buffer like the OPA634 or LM49600. You can set the buffer bias current often up to 20mA which means that it is in class A up to full output in less than 1k.
You take the opamp feedback from the buffer output so the whole thing acts like a hefty class A output opamp.

jan didden
__________________
/Another new issue: Linear Audio Volume 3!
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th January 2011, 03:50 PM   #85
diyAudio Member
 
jacco vermeulen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: At the sea front, just under Rotterdam
Send a message via Yahoo to jacco vermeulen
Quote:
Originally Posted by janneman View Post
easy way to increase an opamp class A output current is to follow it with a buffer
At the risk of getting poo-shot, the LME49600 is much better than the BUF634 with raised BW connection.

(a bag of BUF634 by the cheap in multi-parallel/bridged mode would be nice though)
__________________
Looks like Sponge Bob has killed another thread.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th January 2011, 07:45 PM   #86
jcx is online now jcx  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
my parallel amp push-pull biasing scheme shown earlier in this thread should work with power chip amps as well as op amps

there is also Doug Self's "Class XD" which could be applied to power chip amps


on the smaller scale, some early generation A/DSL driver op amps have bias current setting/boost pins, presumably most of the extra bias is going to the output stage, I believe a few 10s of mA Class A output is possible with some of these chips

they were designed for low distortion (some down to -100 dB) at 100 KHz - low MHz into 25-100 OHm loads

newer ADSL chips have apparently been designed for much lower quiescent current, according to Scott Wurcer the industry has come to accept ~80 dB distortion numbers as adequate so their outputs are low bias again

Last edited by jcx; 17th January 2011 at 08:06 PM.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
low distortion measurements and forcing opamps to class a mlloyd1 Solid State 3 3rd July 2009 12:05 AM
FS: Power Chip OpAmps and other OpAmps & D to A Converter dtm1962 Swap Meet 4 12th January 2006 10:07 PM
biasing opamps in class a matjans Chip Amps 33 19th December 2003 04:05 PM
Class A biasing of opamps DrewP Solid State 25 23rd October 2002 11:18 PM
Why do so few designs use opamps working in class A? fmak Solid State 19 23rd May 2002 03:25 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:24 PM.

Page generated in 0.11072 seconds (76.81% PHP - 23.19% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio