|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Montreal
|
Hi there fellow DiYers, I am trying to learn the why of some things on those PCBs.
I recently bought PCBs from Mr. Elliot to build two (extended) P68. Now a few things strike me about those PCBs and would like to know why they were made as such. First thing, the power tracks are run straight over the output devices. And these tracks are especially widened over the output transistors. Why do so? What are the benefits of having wider traces above the transistors? Why not route them beside the transistors? (I realize this would mean a wider PCB but other reasons than that") We can see the wider traces clearly on this picture taken from Mr. Elliot Web site: http://sound.westhost.com/p68-pic.jpg The second thing that struck me is the size of the holes for the wire links. I could barely fit a 20 AWG wire in them. For a 500W amp, it seems too small to me. I enlarged them to fit 14 AWG. Would a 20 AWG wire been enough for chassis wiring at 5-7 amps? Where can I find info about this? (I googled and searched the forum but didn't find the info). The last thing that also struck me is that there is no protection between the output transistor and the tracks. Can't that potentially lead to a plastic meltdown on the transistor caused by the heat of the power tracks just above? Or am I exaggerating the effects of 5-7 amps in PCB tracks? Thanks for all your answers. Hopefully they'll give me a better understanding of the why of those choices. Sébastien |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Aachen
|
Hi,
here is what i found googling: http://www.powerstream.com/Wire_Size.htm I think Rod did not intend to solder the wires directly into the PCB but to user solder nails (???) to connect the wires to the pcb. Regarding the traces, beware that the screw holes reduce the width. Also i think Rod had the pcb size as well as minimized trace lengths in mind when designing the pcb. If the tracks would warm up so much that the transistor cases melt they have to dissapate more power than the transistors themself, this will not happen. The 5-7A current is not continous. Jochen |
|
|
|
#3 | ||||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Montreal
|
Hi Jochen, thanks for your reply.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks, Sébastien |
||||
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Aachen
|
Sébastien,
Quote:
Quote:
Jochen |
||
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Finland
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
tool49, you could ask Rod yourself why he has done as he had.
It could also be that he has drawn traces but he didn't see things untill it was too late and he has ordered a heap of pcb's. Remember how many times now BrianGT has changed his Gainclone pcb. Personally I think a 500 Watt amp needs 70 um/20 oz copper and also doublesided boards. Compare Jens' excellent looking Leach amp (and I'm sure it will work alright also).
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me Tube Buffered Gainclone in work |Thread |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
As someone has said just ask the guy!
Rod has the best site for DIY audio I have seen. All is circuits are backup by his reasons for creating the circuit from the ground up to the finished article. He has patiently help me get his amps running. In short the guy is commutative.
__________________
DiyAudio |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Elliot's RIAA Preamp questions | Paapaa | Solid State | 4 | 1st February 2007 10:28 PM |
| Rod Elliot P37? | roger-k | Solid State | 21 | 7th October 2006 07:37 PM |
| active filter from rod elliot and sub filter questions | wuffer | Parts | 0 | 2nd October 2005 01:12 PM |
| Another new Rod Elliot amp! p3B! | Mattyo5 | Solid State | 20 | 27th January 2004 11:45 AM |
| Planning to build Rod Elliot's Project3A, number of questions... | ih | Solid State | 20 | 2nd January 2002 10:28 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |