|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Mars
|
I can't remember where I seen this concept, was it home computer CPU heatsinks or was it Rockford Fosgate, whatever
Traditional transistor on heatsink ------------------------ aluminum fins ------------------------ aluminum plate 1/4" thick ------------------------ transistor ------------------------ Copper method ------------------------ aluminum fins ------------------------ aluminum plate 1/4" thick ------------------------ copper plate 1/8" thick ------------------------ transistor ------------------------ What is the pro's/con's of using copper sandwich? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Denmark
|
I havenŽt got much theoretical knowledge to back this up but IŽll give it a shot anyway:
Copper is better at transporting the heat away from the silicon chip, whereas aluminium is better at radiating it to the surrounding air (besides being cheaper). This means that using a copper plate lowers the thermal resistance between the transistor case and the actual heatsink (the fins) and also ensures that the heat sink will be used as effectively as possible because the copper is better at transporting the heat to the "far corners" of the aluminium heatsink. My 0,02 etc. /U. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Mars
|
does any exotic home amplifier companies use this
method? or is it just extreme overkill - heh would you do it if money wasn't an issue? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Ok here's the deal. You have two principal characteristics to look for when you're choosing heatsink material; radiation (given by the colour of the sink's surface) and thermal conductivity (given by the metal).
The thing with cooper is that's an EXCELLENT electrical & heat conductor, which means that heat is quickly removed from the power devices, but it's red/orange which means it radiates poorly. Most sinks are built in Al, which, while it's not such a good heat conductor as Cu (yet still good enough), it's cheaper and can be readly anodized to any colour you like.Now, i'm building my sinks using Al extrusions for the surface area and 2mm thick Cu sheet to bolt them to the Al, hoping to get the best of both. Hopefully it'll work! |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan
|
Lisandro,
Quote:
There must be a downside or manufacturer would have used this method to save cost with smaller heat sinks (less weight). In any case it should make for cooler running FET's or BJT's with a given heat sink. It would be interesting to hear from anyone who tried this before. Rodd Yamas***a |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
|
Quote:
When you go to a dual Cu/Al design you have to balance the interface losses. This really is rocket science! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
![]() On the other hand, it's no unusal to find large sinks using a Cu sheet to help distribute heat quicker, specially in very big ones. My goal was to get good heatsinking at a moderate price. I already bought and cutted the Al extrusions, and will get the Cu sheet this week. It's a lot of metalwork (a LOT), but i'm not spending over US$50. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
And about the rocket science thing... yeah, you're right I once tried to get into the physics of this thing and ended up settling with ESP's sink calculator. Didn't have the courage
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
I don't think you can extrude copper the way you can aluminium, at least not at reasonable pressures anyway, so aluminium wins on cheapness there. Don't stop at a 2mm sheet of copper as a thermal "spreader", 5mm would be a lot better. For all the devices that have their collectors / drains electrically connected, you could mount them *directly* to the copper and get much improved thermal contact, and put the insulating layer (that now has a much greater cross section and therefore a correspondingly lower thermal resistance) between the copper and the aluminium. This is what I have done with my CDA amplifier, see the pic at thread -> http://diyaudio.com/forums/showthrea...5&pagenumber=2
GP. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I'm using 2mm because its the only thing avaliable here at a reasonable price. If i could get thicker sheets i'd use them, but even with 2mm it should have enough thermal inertia.
I like the idea of insulating the copper directly a lot, through i have to see if this is feasible with my h.s. arrangement. Where did you get the insulator sheet? |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Copper heatsink tweak - Thermaltake Copper Heatsinks | Ruach | Digital Source | 16 | 23rd September 2006 10:59 PM |
| Copper block heatsink C/W | Nabetse | Chip Amps | 5 | 8th October 2005 07:26 AM |
| large copper heatsink | raidfibre | Swap Meet | 1 | 8th September 2005 01:48 PM |
| copper vs aluminum | amo | Multi-Way | 11 | 1st October 2003 07:13 PM |
| Aluminum vs. copper voice coil wire? | capslock | Multi-Way | 7 | 28th October 2002 03:46 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |