|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Connecticut
|
Is there any inherent advantage to using TO-3 packages vs their flat pack counterparts?
The only thing I can think of is a possible thermal advantage, with better case to heatsink or case to ambient cooling. Maybe junction to case as well, if the die bonding is better in a metal herm sealed package. But I can't find any numbers in the spec sheets to know for sure. Any thoughts on this?
__________________
dave |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The one and only
|
Actually the manufacturers spec a better thermal figure
for the plastics, but I'm not sure that it's simply them being less conservative. In any case, the TO-3's are becoming more expensive and less available, and I have only a few years worth left in stock. Sonically, I don't hear a difference, the reliability and measurements look the same, and the customers seem to care less as time goes on. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Florida
|
The plastic ones are easier to mount, but other than that, I like the TO-3's better except for the fact you have to have more holes in the heatsink.
The TO-3's heat up slower, and I like that as well. IMO you don't need as big of a heatsink with the metal TO-3s as with the flat plastic ones. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Georgetown, On
|
Huh?, the metal packages heat up slower?? In my experience they heat up the same.
The plastic packages save production costs, so that's what industry wants. They are just as reliable as long as they are clamped to the heatsink. I'm not convinced the single screw has as good contact (just being old?) -Chris |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
HI,
Generally the plastic version has a lower Tjmax than TO3. Calculating back to Rjc shows that most plastic have a lower thermal resistance than TO3. Does the manufacturer recognise that the olastic part is potentially more vulnerable at elevated temps? This confirms earlier suspicion that a bigger heatsink is recommended for plastic to keep them cooler, If you intend operating at elevated temp then 200 deg C versions have a better SOA (I believe that 200 degC is only available in TO3).
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Prague,Czech Republic
|
Look at IR's Super TO 220 package
.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
TO3's have a much higher torque rating than plastic.
(i broke a couple of the square dude casings) Because of the eliptic shape of the TO3 housing, and two holes for torqueing them, pressure is distributed more evenly, contact surface is much better. Plastic cases have elastic behavior when torqueing, not really a point with the metal TO3, also a reason for bad connecting surface. Resistance case to heatsink is 0.30 compared to 0.50 for a TO247, at the best. With class A amplifiers that is a major disadvantage when using plasticos, my view. The difference of 0.20 is for every output device. That means the heatsink will have to surrender the 0.20, 0.20 is quite a difference in heatsink. To make it worse, the 0.20 has to be divided by the number of devices mounted on it. As Mr Pass said: fat chance the TO3's will be there for very much longer. Not just for output devices, also for other active parts. The mil. spec. often came in TO3 cases. I am not keen on spending leasure time marching, but mil spec devices always had the same effect as a dirty mag. I am about to raid NP's stash !
__________________
Looks like Sponge Bob has killed another thread. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
That was accidental, i can be clumsy, Per.
I noticed a few times that bolts loosened on plastic cases, a professional audio friend already adviced me to torque output devices well, especially on class A stages. My thought was that plastic and metal do not mix well, with large temperature differences. Thermal expansion for plastic is much different from the one for metal. Even combining alloy and metal causes expansion problems. A major problem with ships, btw : cruise ships have alloy superstructures and steel hulls.
__________________
Looks like Sponge Bob has killed another thread. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rock Ridge
|
Use hi-temp thread lock on the screws. It stands up to brake rotors heat cycling, it will stand up to transistor heat cycling.
__________________
Twisted Pear Audio |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FREE Marantz CD-50 SE metal-plastic chassis (CDM4 based) | honinbou | Swap Meet | 0 | 7th June 2009 02:34 PM |
| Found Some 2SC367 Metal Can Toshiba Transistors...Any Info or uses for them | Minion | Solid State | 5 | 2nd April 2007 08:30 PM |
| Metal dome should always go with metal cone? Is this a rule? | Jay_WJ | Multi-Way | 5 | 5th February 2007 06:53 PM |
| cutting metal/plastic sheets ?? | kambule | Everything Else | 0 | 30th June 2006 10:58 PM |
| Metal Oxide vs flamme proof vs metal film | ostie01 | Parts | 28 | 26th June 2006 06:38 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12014 seconds (80.91% PHP - 19.09% MySQL) with 11 queries |