|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Israel
|
Hello to all!!
After a while of being interested in mic preamplifiers, and after hearing a lot of good stuff about opamps like the AD797, AD825, OPA627, etc.. and their performance in audio circuits, I'v decided to built a mic preamp based on opamps. I must say that the AD797 and OPA627 sound pretty good, but something was missing...The sound was a bit cold. I wasn't giving up and tried a few combinations of input transformers and opamps but still I wasn't satisfied with the results... So I decided to give discrete opamps a chance.... and built some...the first I'v built was the one in M.Leach article and you can find it in this thread. I plugged it in and... the sound was very good!! not cold as the opamps' sound and it was also very quiet!! ![]() The reason I decided to build M. Leach design was because I'v seen that all the good discrete designs are using this topology of second LTP stage (if this is how it called), like Melcor, API 2520, Kaneda preamp, JC-2 preamp... so I guess there is a reason for that... Not to make a long story longer I'v decided to try the same topology (fet input, second LTP, and bjts output) but with fully complementary output stage and not the quasi-comp. I must say that I'm not an EE, so the design is not perfect... I was aiming for a 'standart' +-15v supply, low noise, max of 40 db gain with good bandwidth, good output capabilities and yet simple. Any comments about the story/design are welcomed... Best regards, Udi.
__________________
"Things should be as simple as possible, but no simpler" Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi! if i turn volume maximum, my speaker has "windy sound" .I thought that my amp wasn't stable! Now i have just found the reason . That sound's from pre-amp ,TL084 (but only use 1 of total 4 )
your pre-amp has balanced -input (do i mistake in my sentence? ) .A balanced-output,why not? perhaps if you do that, the mirror can be removed.
__________________
Justice for Victims of Agent Orange http://www.petitiononline.com/AOVN/Thank all of you! |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
|
I got 2 variations:
1) how about adding extra 1N4148 diode in string to get class A? 2) remove Q2 and Q9 parts and connect base of Q4 to anode of LED maybe thru 220 resistor. Now that resembles my PS audio preamp. Tom |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
|
Which one is better: the AD797 or OPA627?
I'm not sure what you mean by cold, the best I've trried was only the 5534 and it was lacking in precision. Tom |
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Israel
|
Hi,
Quote:
17ma, isn't this already class A? 2) I guess it's possible.. Quote:
and the AD797 is better than the NE5532. Regards, Udi.
__________________
"Things should be as simple as possible, but no simpler" Albert Einstein |
||
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
You are missing a capacitor collector-base on Q2. Should there also be a ccs for the bottom Q2 and Q10?
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Israel
|
Quote:
I found that the second capacitor is not needed for stability (at least from simulations). A ccs if needed should be on top of Q2 and Q10, I think. Regards, Udi.
__________________
"Things should be as simple as possible, but no simpler" Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
It may simulate OK, but if you want to maintain electrical symmetry and stability in real life, put the cap in.
As for the ccs, yes it would appear 'on top' in the schematic, but I always think of emitters as the bottom of a transistor.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Israel
|
How can I tell if the opamp is working in class A?
The output transistors are biased at 17ma, does it mean that it's class A? Udi.
__________________
"Things should be as simple as possible, but no simpler" Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Israel
|
Actually, in simulation when I add the second cap the design
seems to be LESS stable. I guess that a second ccs is not needed because the first stage is keeping the second stage current more or less constant. Udi.
__________________
"Things should be as simple as possible, but no simpler" Albert Einstein |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 990 discrete opamp | udip | Solid State | 18 | 12th February 2009 11:00 PM |
| Discrete OPAMP | audio-gd | Vendor's Bazaar | 26 | 11th October 2008 10:58 AM |
| discrete opamp modules | biovizier | Parts | 6 | 2nd June 2005 03:29 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11051 seconds (78.40% PHP - 21.60% MySQL) with 11 queries |