|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Warsaw
|
hi everybody!
is it possible to make an amp with output bjts never seitching off by a current source at its base? This one simulates well, with overbiasing like 350-500mA neither of power bjts switches off. But is it real in terms of: equal and known beta, thermal stability..... and so on? I think componets selection would be crucial, maybe MJE21193/4 ? any comments welcome!!!! best regards |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Behind you
|
It's possible, but from your schematic it looks like all the current is being pushed directly into the bases of the output transistors. That will make it totally dependant on their hfe and thus unworkable in real life.
What you want to do is control the Vbe of each transistor individually. In your circuit you could accomplish that by removing C7 and splitting R50 and connecting the midpoint to the output. Then a fixed current through the now two resistors will enforce a minimum Vbe and thus a minimum current.
__________________
https://mrevil.asvachin.eu/ |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
This concept is right provided linear enough output devices, but note that the drivers are working in class B
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Warsaw
|
Quote:
Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bandung
|
Can you trick the cct more upstream, like around Q54-55? Maybe a resistor there to the rails from bases gives the same effect?
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
The one and only
|
You can reduce this trick to the switching of a pair of
small high speed diodes, but you'll have to go elsewhere to have no switching elements in the gain path. And why bother? Get a nice efficient driver with a big magnet and drive the hell out of it with 10 watts of Class A. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Netherlands
|
darkfenriz,
I don't think this will work. You're just pulling the drivers in reverse. And maybe the drivers are better in switching than the output transistors, but still... Something completely different: I noticed that you have added a capacitor to your current sources, probably for decoupling, but that is not what they will do. In this way you just increase the noise of the current source and add power supply noise to the output. This current source is working with feedback and the capacitor is removing the AC feedback path, making the current very sensitive to power supply noise. Steven
__________________
The Analog Art shows no sign of yielding to the Dodo's fate. The emergence and maturation of monolithic processing finesse has perhaps lagged a bit behind the growth of the Binary Business. But whereas digital precision is forever bounded by bits, there is no limit excepting Universal Hiss to the ultimate accuracy and functional variety of simple analog circuits. - Barry Gilbert, 1973 |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Montevideo
|
You may want to check a design I proposed in case you have not.
It could easily be adapted to bjt's in EF configuration, main advantage is feedback loop that stabilizes quiescent current independently of device and temperature variations. If you have trouble figuring out how to adapt, let me know, see if can help. Rodolfo |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
darkfenriz! do you try to do it?
__________________
Justice for Victims of Agent Orange http://www.petitiononline.com/AOVN/Thank all of you! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Warsaw
|
not yet
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Closer to reality, less "pleasant"? | Patrik Floding | Solid State | 144 | 27th August 2009 11:17 PM |
| The "Leap-Frog" Method Of Switching Amplifier Control Loop Design | analogspiceman | Class D | 29 | 1st December 2006 03:21 PM |
| Switching amp and "ground rail" | rtarbell | Solid State | 3 | 6th July 2006 03:49 PM |
| WTB: "Audio Reality" book by Rozenbilt | LuckyLyndy | Swap Meet | 0 | 8th November 2004 05:46 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10593 seconds (79.47% PHP - 20.53% MySQL) with 11 queries |