|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Diego
|
The following circuit gets used a lot in amp input stages.
I don't like it. It may well adjust the DC offset, but it has the nasty side effect of simultaneously unbalancing the gain between the two sides of the diffpair. It also might wreak havoc if the wiper gets lifted from the resistive element. On the other hand, it is simple. It may work better with JFETs. Am I right to assume that DC offset in JFET amplifiers might result from differences in their physical characteristics such that the side with higher Beta or K factor or whatever you call the transconductance parameter, also have lower Vgs, so that when you adjust the pot to equalize the inputs again you actually improve the small signal balance as well? What are the most elegant (fewest components, least effect on signal, etc) alternatives? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I don't know about FET's, but with BJT's it's quite simple to make a circuit that does not need any DC adjustment (That's if there's global feedback)
I have seen some Designs that uses a pot instead of the resistor in the Collector of the transistor that feeds the VAS stage. It's also an option to have a POT to control the current throug one half of the inputstage (when there are two diff amps) thats what i have seen, but since i believe in feedback, I have not used a DC trimmer in the design that i work on at the moment. An Other design that don't use global feedback can be found at http://www.lcaudio.dk/millennium.PDF (a really nice amp !!) \Jens |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
The one and only
|
Actually it does not unbalanced the gain pair - they
see the same impedance regardless of setting. However, I never use it because you can figure that someday the wiper will get dirty and open up, and then things will get interesting. We always want to design for the day when the wiper opens, and that is why on Vbe multipliers for bias circuits we put the pot on B-E and set it up so that when the wiper opens, the bias goes down. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brazil
|
Just for the record: even multiturn pots will eventually get dirty?
I thought their being supposedly air-tight would prevent that. How much am I wrong? Carlos |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
The one and only
|
They won't last forever. They might outlast the rest
of the circuit.... Most of the production applications of the above circuit I have seen will put some resistors from either end of the pot to the wiper so that the diff pair will always see something. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Diego
|
Thank you Nelson Pass for pointing out the "obvious", right under my nose.
Something about my weird visual way of looking at circuits makes me look at that drawing and see the pot's wiper as a determined voltage, even though it is connected to a high-Z current source! Sometimes I need people to make me see the things right in front of me! |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| cmoy dc offset correction | magnade | Solid State | 0 | 5th August 2009 04:22 PM |
| Offset Correction using Bias Compensation | lineup | Solid State | 13 | 20th November 2008 03:39 AM |
| Alternative offset correction for Alephs. | Netlist | Pass Labs | 4 | 28th September 2005 08:39 AM |
| R/Boom correction | timolien | Multi-Way | 1 | 7th July 2003 03:38 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08919 seconds (79.00% PHP - 21.00% MySQL) with 11 queries |