Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Non-feedback parametric linearisation in FETs
Non-feedback parametric linearisation in FETs
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27th December 2004, 05:46 PM   #1
x-pro is offline x-pro  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
x-pro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: London
Default Non-feedback parametric linearisation in FETs

This is my small Christmas present for those who like zero NFB single-ended class A amplification

I've worked in my spare time (for last year and half) on a home project to make a very linear single-ended transistor amplifier without NFB and one of my ideas I've described in a small article on my web site here:

http://www.ant-audio.co.uk/Theory/Pa...earisation.htm

The performance of this circuit, despite the simplicity of the concept, is quite impressive - here is one example:

For a voltage amplifier stage using this idea I've measured distortion levels vs RMS current in the load resistor. Idle DC current was 4.5 mA, for 0.15 mA RMS current THD were 0.0025%, for 0.5 mA - 0.03%, for 1.15mA RMS (that is a swing from 3 to 6 mA (!) ) - only 0.16% .

It is possible to make this approach work even without the source resistor, thought it requires very careful transistors selection. THe circuit of my headphone amplifier (A.N.T. Audio "Amber") includes a voltage amplifier stage based on this idea.

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

Alex Nikitin
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th December 2004, 05:52 PM   #2
jan.didden is offline jan.didden  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
jan.didden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The great city of Turnhout, BE
Interesting, Alex. Is there info on the ANT headphone amp on the 'net? Does the 'T' stand for "Technology"?

Jan Didden

Edit: found it. Beautifully executed, very professional looking. Where do you get those enclosures?
__________________
Cable: a potential source of trouble interconnecting two other potential sources of trouble - Erik Margan
Linear Audio pubs and articles . The SilentSwitcher now at diyaudio store SilentSwitcher. Keeping in touch with SY.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th December 2004, 05:58 PM   #3
x-pro is offline x-pro  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
x-pro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: London
Quote:
Originally posted by janneman
Interesting, Alex. Is there info on the ANT headphone amp on the 'net? Does the 'T' stand for "Technology"?

Jan Didden
Jan,

look at my web page: www.ant-audio.co.uk . There is also a review of it on head-fi :

http://www4.head-fi.org/forums/showthread.php?t=88528

And well guessed - A.N.T. does stand for Alex Nikitin Technology

Alex

P.S. - enclosure is a standard Hammond case.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th December 2004, 09:44 PM   #4
darkfenriz is offline darkfenriz  Poland
diyAudio Member
 
darkfenriz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Warsaw
damn
i cannot see pictures in your link
seems intersting...
could you attach these figures?

cheers
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th December 2004, 10:16 PM   #5
x-pro is offline x-pro  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
x-pro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: London
Quote:
Originally posted by darkfenriz
damn
i cannot see pictures in your link
seems intersting...
could you attach these figures?

cheers
Here is the link to a PDF file:

http://www.ant-audio.co.uk/Theory/Pa...earisation.pdf

Cheers

Alex
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th December 2004, 10:42 PM   #6
tschrama is offline tschrama  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The Netherlands
Hi X-pro,

Best new years wishes for you and thx for the PDF.. looks very interesting .. enough to keep me spice-ing for a week ... at least....;-),


cheers,
thijs
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th December 2004, 10:55 PM   #7
Bricolo is offline Bricolo  France
diyAudio Member
 
Bricolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
what's the difference with a cascode?
__________________
Just remember: in theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice it usually is quite a bit difference... Bob Pease
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th December 2004, 11:10 PM   #8
x-pro is offline x-pro  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
x-pro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: London
Quote:
Originally posted by Bricolo
what's the difference with a cascode?
Hmm - 8-10 times lower distortion? However it is only true for a specific combination of the "upper" and "lower" transistor parameters and for the right value of the drain current.

Alex
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th December 2004, 12:25 PM   #9
Hennie is offline Hennie  South Africa
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Pretoria
Very interesting indeed. To avoid opamps some I/V converters for DACS use valves. They rely on something like a 50 ohm resistor to ground followed by a valve voltage amplification stage. Would you say this topology is suitable for this purpose? That would be great, because few CD players have space for valve stages.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th December 2004, 12:52 PM   #10
x-pro is offline x-pro  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
x-pro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: London
Quote:
Originally posted by Hennie
Very interesting indeed. To avoid opamps some I/V converters for DACS use valves. They rely on something like a 50 ohm resistor to ground followed by a valve voltage amplification stage. Would you say this topology is suitable for this purpose? That would be great, because few CD players have space for valve stages.
This topology can be used in many applications, including this one . For 50 Ohm and, say, FS 1 mA RMS output current of the DAC, the maximum input voltage would be 50 mV - near the "sweet spot" for this circuit, with a possibility of a very decent performance - with the distortions about 0.002% (mostly 2-nd order) and SNR about 100 dB.

Alex
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Non-feedback parametric linearisation in FETsHide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DIY Digital Parametric EQ macboy Digital Source 58 7th December 2011 06:35 PM
Speaker impedance linearisation Inductor Tubes / Valves 4 8th May 2009 02:46 AM
3-way passive speaker impedance linearisation Inductor Solid State 1 30th April 2009 01:21 PM
Parametric Q Calculation--help, please tocs100 Multi-Way 3 2nd January 2006 12:21 PM
Parametric EQ as mox sidekick JensRasmussen Solid State 16 13th September 2004 09:58 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:59 AM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 16.67%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2018 diyAudio
Wiki