|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi All
I´m under the impression that "non-hifi-nerds" eg. everyday peoble generally believe that Class A sounds better than B, B better than C, C better than D and so forth. Everyone (in here) knows that the indexes only refers to the collector current angle, for class A, B and C, and that Class D is PWM. We also know that class AB can be made to sound as good, and maybe even better than class A... know this is an issue to be discussed beyond the end of time. But: Am i right when saying that not-so-well-informed users of common hifi-equipment generally believes that the index of classes is reverse proportional to sound quality? Thanks in advance
__________________
If you cannot measure it - you cannot improve it! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Prague,Czech Republic
|
Not - so - well - informed - users are here also, so you will get many oportunity informations
. Class of amp tell anything about real quality. I have heard many " A ", which was s...s and several " AB " which was excellent |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gütersloh
|
I think, a well designed ClassA should always outperform any ClassAB,
but a well designed ClassAB will always outperform a "standard" ClassA. It's just that ClassA can't have crossoverdistortion and should always be more linear, especially for higher freqs. The quality of an amp mainly comes from how good the design is, not topology or class. For example, my own ClassAB outperforms my MF-A1, a commercial ClassA. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Australia!
|
I've heard good Class a/b's and good class A's, but the day you show me a good sounding class b...!!! A class b i had sounded like ****!!! It was horrible...
But i don't know about class a/b vs a, as any very well designed amp will sound good, a very good class a vs very good class a/b the difference should be so minimal you shouldn't be able to tell.... However "technically" i'd say the class a would be 'better' in this case... however i cannot tell you why or how, but cool factor alone Aaron |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Prague,Czech Republic
|
With boxes with average efficiency ( cca 90 dB/w or less ) you need minimally 100 W/ ch for preservation of natural sound dynamic. On this look is funny amp with output power 10 W. With typical efficiency of class A ( cca 25 % ) you get by amp 2*100 W of output power 600 W of continuous heat. I don't like " good sounding " stove
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Behind you
|
In an ideal world with ideal transistors, all amplifier classes give identical outputs. In practice, all can give similarly good performance (except class C, since it isn't possible to build a pure class C audio amp), but class A starts off with the advantage of lacking crossover distortion.
Class A amps are not so common because of the ridiculously low efficiency which overrides any possible distortion advantage. I have a feeling that technology advances, class D will give the best performance, since it is theoretically capable of both extremely low distortion and near 100% efficiency at the same time. Quote:
__________________
https://mrevil.asvachin.eu/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Charlotte,NC,USA
|
A simple test would be to take a class A amp and reduce the bias to class AB and compare the differences.
Most people would choose the amp in class A. There are differences in the sound that occur that cannot be attributed to distortion alone. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Croatia
|
Quote:
Regards, Milan |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gütersloh
|
Quote:
work in ClassAB. Escpecially the singleended versions can't work ClassAB. "Biasing in ClassB" ??? I thought ClassB has a biasing of 0ma ? Mike |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Best possible sound quality from +12 ATX PSU | Arnop | Chip Amps | 3 | 6th April 2009 11:40 AM |
| Better Sound Quality | LqDFx | Car Audio | 14 | 16th June 2006 04:49 PM |
| Quality Control differences = variations in sound quality? | KT | Class D | 0 | 14th November 2004 06:51 AM |
| Sound quality,which is best? | Richard.C | Chip Amps | 10 | 23rd August 2004 07:58 AM |
| TAD sound quality | Kal | Multi-Way | 12 | 6th April 2004 06:16 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12665 seconds (79.11% PHP - 20.89% MySQL) with 11 queries |