Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 14th December 2004, 09:25 AM   #11
diyAudio Member
 
Ouroboros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nottingham UK
It's all to do with how fast the voltage on the 'input' side to the diode drops when the diode gets reverse biased. on 50 or 60Hz full-wave rectified mains, the rate-of-change of the voltage is obviously defined by the fact that the signal is a FW rectified sine wave.

The real problem is with continuous-conduction boost power-factor-correction stages for SMPSUs like I have to design (for my paid work) at times.

Standard 50Hz bridge rectifiers diodes will not have controlled recovery characteristics. You can slug the reverse recovery by putting capacitors across each diode. This increases the reverse conduction time, but slows down the recovery time, so it reduces the unwanted RF noise caused by the fast di/dt turn-off.
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th December 2004, 10:28 AM   #12
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
 
richie00boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gloucestershire, England, UK
Cheers, that's cleared it up. The question now though is whether to slug each diode or just across AC and DC on the rectifier (2 snubbers in total).
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th December 2004, 10:19 PM   #13
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: England
Quote:
Originally posted by richie00boy
Cheers, that's cleared it up. The question now though is whether to slug each diode or just across AC and DC on the rectifier (2 snubbers in total).
I'd also like to ask that question.

I'm wondering if it's fussing for the need of fussing. Theoretically, it makes sense, and you could probably measure some change on a scope. But if you were to click the snubbers in and out of place, would you actually hear a worth while difference with modern diodes like Hexfreds?

Would ceramics be suitable for snubbers?
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th December 2004, 07:04 AM   #14
diyAudio Member
 
Ouroboros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nottingham UK
If you are using diodes designed for SMPSU high-frequency use (like the HexFREDs) then you are unlikely to gain any benefit from the capacitors.

The only time I've had a serious HF noise problem with a transformer/bridge rectifier on normal 50Hz mains was using a bridge made of 1N4004 diodes in a low-current 18V supply.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2007, 02:19 PM   #15
tubee is offline tubee  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
tubee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Netherlands
Sorry for kickin' this old thread, but rather interesting facts where discussed here.

What i have done a while ago is swapping the standard two (for dual mono) 35A diode bridges to a diy diode bridge with four HFA08TB60 hexfred diodes mounted isolated on an aluminium L profile. The new bridges are for the current section of a diy hybrid amplifier with E88CC srpp voltage stage and a old pair of hitachi K135/J50 powerfets to the speaker.

The sound compared to the standard diode bridge was more "backward', and maybe some more detailed in treble. But the bass is worsened imo, less control, more boomy, it sounds like a higher Q factor speaker, and i only swapped the diodes!
Tried a snubber on it also, but removed it, didn't help much

Anyone the same sort of sound experiences?
__________________
Daisy Bell
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
shock with hexfred's durkla18 Solid State 3 17th May 2008 07:20 AM
Ixys Schottky and hexfred bridges imperfectcircle Parts 10 12th May 2008 10:42 PM
Snubber for HEXFRED? pooge Solid State 3 29th July 2005 02:41 AM
HexFRED - why? richie00boy Parts 2 21st November 2003 06:27 PM
possible hexfred diode group buy Brian Donaldson Swap Meet 6 7th October 2003 02:09 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:34 AM.

Page generated in 0.07161 seconds (78.50% PHP - 21.50% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio