User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
 8th November 2004, 07:38 PM #1 deleveld diyAudio Member   Join Date: Apr 2002 Comments on unusual bridge amp? Hi Everyone, I have been trying to design a symmetrical bridge amp and have come up with an (I think) unique design. I would like to discuss this design if you have anything interesting to say I would like to hear it. I tried to make the input stage fully symmetrical but I am not sure if there are better ways to do it. Any advice? Is my input ground wrong? I know the output transistor bias is non-optimal, I left that out for clarity. But the way the compensation cap is set (like I remember from NDFL amps) seems to help remove crossover distortion at high freq, so maybe I might not even change the bias. What input voltage should satuare the output? I figure a bit less than 1v, right? You can see a GIF of the circuit made with LTspice at: http://www.deleveld.dds.nl/bridgebjt.gif Thanks for any comments, Doug Eleveld
 9th November 2004, 12:22 AM #2 cunningham   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Knoxville Hi Doug, I would suggest that if symmetry is the goal, you should scrap the quasi-complementary output circuit. This only complicates things because the signal for driving the positive half is a follower, and the negative half is a voltage amp. Use complementary pairs. There are many devices to choose from better than 2N3055. Your VAS stages could use current sources, as does the output(& driver) bias. Optional of course, but will help with stability. Does this circuit clip at equal voltages, positive and negative? If not, bridged output will be limited by the lesser. You could use two seperate differentials for the input, one for each channel, driven by a phase splitter circuit. LTP is not required, but a single transistor input stage has it's drawbacks. I don't see how this circuit would make two equal but opposite signals.
 9th November 2004, 10:04 PM #4 cunningham   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Knoxville I see where your coming from now. But I do have a question...should the input be a balanced input?(+ 0 -). If the input was (+Vin---GND--- -Vin) each input is referenced to ground instead of each other. Then the inputs could be made fully symetrical.
 10th November 2004, 06:42 AM #5 deleveld diyAudio Member   Join Date: Apr 2002 Yes it would if I thought I could get balanced inputs to work with my CD player. It's just standard unbalanced outputs. If I had balanced output from the CD I would have put the ground at a more usual place (-ve supply). Bu I havent built it yet so there could well be problems with how the input grounding is. Thanks, Doug
 10th November 2004, 08:43 AM #6 darkfenriz   diyAudio Member     Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Warsaw well interesting amp i have few questions though 1. i donot understand how you want to avoid crossover distortion- at first look it seems pure class b, it us tricky somehow i guess ...confusion... 2. at suppy you intend to use one huge electrlitic cap from + to - rails, right ??? classic use of two caps and ground would fail here- you would amplify 0 potential. 3. aside from symetry, how you intend to keep low dc through speaker?? as the result of using 1% components-worst case may produce huge dc sorry if my questions are stupid- i may not understand some ideas cheers
 10th November 2004, 09:31 AM #7 deleveld diyAudio Member   Join Date: Apr 2002 Well there certianly might be crossover distortion. But in simulations at least C2 and C5 really lower crossover distortion, especially at HF. Notice how the compensation caps C2 and C5 go to the base and the output. Normally they go between the base and collector. At high frequency they are local feedback loops linearizing base-output transfer function. So it tends to lower crossover distortion. I got this idea from an old series of articles called NDFL (nested differential feedback loop) by a name I dont remember (Cherry?). Some people claim that it can cause oscillations but if I remeber correctly the zobel networks at the output are really necessary to reduce this. Yes the supply is a single cap. Rememebr that caps store energy compared to the square of the voltage. So if you have +40 volts and say 1000uf you have more energy stored than 2 1000uf caps at +-20 volts. And the single cap is going to be cheaper too. DC at the output depends pretty much only on R4 and R10 and the Q6,Q8 matching. I'm not really sure the best polace for a DC offset trimmer, maybe ontop of R23. Doug
 10th November 2004, 12:02 PM #8 Workhorse diyAudio Member     Join Date: Dec 2004 Commentable Experienced Thoughts Hi Doug, Nice to hear about bridge amps in professional manner from u. Your Point regarding QUASI-COMPLIMENTARY is absolutely complainces with professional standards. Their is far better symmetry obtained using NPN/NPN devices rather than using NPN/PNP devices. Complementary doesnt stands tall in pro environment very well. We also use bridge topology exclusively in our amps with only N-channel Mosfets at output. ur comments regarding advantages of Bridging are quite right. I have studied ur circuit in detail, Acc to me some issues must be dealt with, Biasing Network Balanced input Use higher bandwidth devices at output such as MJL21196 or use Mosfets Feedback network Replace Bootstrapping with Active Current source. Hope that it helps
 10th November 2004, 12:34 PM #9 Upupa Epops   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Prague,Czech Republic Pure " class B " - is it joke ?
Workhorse
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Dec 2004
Commentable Experienced Thoughts

Quote:
 Originally posted by Upupa Epops Pure " class B " - is it joke ?

UPUPA friend I have pointed out the Class-B stage as biasing network statement , because no professional amp is pure class-B , but Class AB .

hope this helps

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Site     Site Announcements     Forum Problems Amplifiers     Solid State     Pass Labs     Tubes / Valves     Chip Amps     Class D     Power Supplies     Headphone Systems Source & Line     Analogue Source     Analog Line Level     Digital Source     Digital Line Level     PC Based Loudspeakers     Multi-Way     Full Range     Subwoofers     Planars & Exotics Live Sound     PA Systems     Instruments and Amps Design & Build     Parts     Equipment & Tools     Construction Tips     Software Tools General Interest     Car Audio     diyAudio.com Articles     Music     Everything Else Member Areas     Introductions     The Lounge     Clubs & Events     In Memoriam The Moving Image Commercial Sector     Swap Meet     Group Buys     The diyAudio Store     Vendor Forums         Vendor's Bazaar         Sonic Craft         Apex Jr         Audio Sector         Acoustic Fun         Chipamp         DIY HiFi Supply         Elekit         Elektor         Mains Cables R Us         Parts Connexion         Planet 10 hifi         Quanghao Audio Design         Siliconray Online Electronics Store         Tubelab     Manufacturers         AKSA         Audio Poutine         Musicaltech         Aussie Amplifiers         CSS         exaDevices         Feastrex         GedLee         Head 'n' HiFi - Walter         Heatsink USA         miniDSP         SITO Audio         Twin Audio         Twisted Pear         Wild Burro Audio

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post xiphmont Chip Amps 15 26th February 2008 07:22 PM digi01 Chip Amps 0 8th September 2006 02:10 AM jethdub Chip Amps 2 26th February 2006 01:07 AM skaara Class D 6 3rd February 2005 07:23 PM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:07 AM.