|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Netherlands
|
I would appraciate any thoughts on this low power 5V regulator.
I can cram it in 5 cm2, so it can be placed very close to the point where it's needed. A current feedback opamp like AD811 can supply up to about 100mA, datasheet mentions voltage noise is quite low. I measured current draw of 59mA, when feeding 10V and outputting 5V into 100 ohms. BTW, there can't be an output capacitor ! Regards, Rudolf. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
rbroer,
I don't see any reason why it wouldn't work, except maybe the start-up. Did you in fact check that it does start reliably? And why can there be no cap? Cheers, Jan Didden |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Account Disabled
|
That is alright.
You TL431, one of my favourites, low noise referens. Op amp is not that important as long it can handle currents. Referens is feed by the regulated votage. Good ! As long as you can get it to start up. In such design, sometimes Circuit will not start up. That is because if referens is zero, the output of OPamp wil be zero, and the referns can not get any current to rise up to 2,5V. Otherwise very good design! gromanswe |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Netherlands
|
Quote:
No output cap, current feedback opamp don't like driving capacitive loads. I'm just curious if it is worth making tiny pcb's; so, will it better the average LT1085 or TL431 in respects of noise, frequency response, dynamic behaviour ? Regards, Rudolf. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Account Disabled
|
I use a combination of a temp-stabil,
zener-shunt diode and some Current Amplifying Transistors. See picture at bottom. Voltage References: TS431 (TO-92) 1.24-6.00V 0.06-30mA, low current, min 60uA TL431 (TO-92,DIL8,SO8) 2.5-36V 1-100mA, minimum 0.500mA both 50ppm/C temp. TL1431 (SO8) 2.5-36V 1-100mA 13ppm/C temp, precision. A LINK to ST products, Referenses.....PDF download http://www.st.com/stonline/books/ ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an interesting Circuit, used to reduce noise from regulators with about 20dB (only 1/10 of noise remains) http://www.wenzel.com/documents/finesse.html ------------------------------------------------------------ See Picture! You really do not need an OP. You can use 1 or 2 transistors, depending on how much Current is drawn. See to that TL431 gets enough current, 1 mA recommended. Could manage on .5mA. TS431 only needs 60uA. gromanswe |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Account Disabled
|
gromanswe
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Account Disabled
|
Here is download of TL431 PDF.
http://rv6llh.rsuh.ru/PDF/TL431.pdf Of the internal diagram, we can see that this is no diode. It is a Circuit consisting of 11 transistors. It has some of these arranged as a bandgap referens. It is those down at left. This compensates for tempchanges. It also uses some small capacitances, to avoid oscillation, and make it stable. In PDF is also 13 different applications. Circuits where TL431 is used in different ways. gromanswe |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Rudolf,
Yes, your asalysis of the start-up sounds correct. Re: output cap: I know a CFO are sensitive to cap loading (who isn't, these days...), but it is another matter with a cap of say 1uF or more. That should not make the circuit unstable. I think it is worthwhile to try it, it will compensate somewhat for the rising Zout with frequency. Gromanswe, I agree, a nifty circuit! But it is no match for Rudolfs' circuit. For one thing, your circuit has limited loop gain so inevitably the Zout will be larger leading to much larger output voltage variations with load variations. Also, the rejection of input noise & ripple will be worse. And Rudolfs' circuit can also sink current, which can be an advantage in some applications (high frequency inductive loads as in DACs). But of course your circuit can source much higher current. Cheers, Jan Didden |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Moonee Ponds, Vic, Australia
|
<b>ALW</b> posted this some time ago
"<i><font color=#800040>DIY Hi-Fi myths debunked - no 431. Here's the noise spectra of a TL431, vs an LM317 and 2 samples of LT1086's. All are set to the same o/p voltage and properly decoupled. I'll let you guess which is which </font> <a href="http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=985&perpage=15&highlight=t l431s&pagenumber=2"><img src="http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/attachment.php?postid=17984" alt=""></a> The pictures a link to the thread James |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
|
Just a thought....
If some one wanted more current, (and maybe lower noise?) couldn't they piggy-back 2 or more amplifiers? Heat disapation might become a problem. This would not increase the footprint but would increase the verticle dimension only a small amount. Aud_Mot |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| what r your thoughts on Power Acoustik amp??? | meandean1982 | Car Audio | 10 | 21st February 2009 02:40 PM |
| any thoughts/explanation on the power supply for this circuit? | jarthel | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 21st March 2007 04:17 AM |
| thoughts on MOX power supply | cowanrg | Parts | 4 | 2nd August 2005 09:15 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10785 seconds (79.65% PHP - 20.35% MySQL) with 11 queries |