
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  diyAudio Store  Gallery  Wiki  Blogs  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 
Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. 

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
9th July 2001, 09:15 PM  #1 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Poole, England

I have been reading the National Semiconductor datasheets for the LM317 series of regulators and saw a schematic that caught my eye. The AC from the secondary of the transformer was regulated (2 regulators required), therefore the reservoir capacitors downline of the rectification should see smaller troughs in the incoming waveform & will therefore recover charge more quickly.
I suppose it must also be possible to put a single regulator immediately after the rectifier and then smooth that. The regulators would current limit and prevent any reservoir capacitor stressing at switch on, but with the big caps downstream of the regulator there should be oodles of current available. Just a thought....Anybody ever tried any of this or is it just not worth it? 
10th July 2001, 12:16 AM  #2 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: UK

Jason
The circuit you are referring to acts as a peak limiter on the ac waveform so the end result will be a much lower maximum voltage on the smoothing capacitors, and therefore a much lower available dc voltage. It will do nothing to reduce the 'troughs' in the incoming waveform. These will still drop to 0V in line with the rectified ac waveform. Geoff 
10th July 2001, 12:08 PM  #3 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Poole, England

Post Regulator Reservoir Capacitors
I agree that the voltage between cycles must ultimately fall to zero, i also agree that the regulator will limit the peak voltage supplied to the capacitors, but say for example you require a 30 volt rail and put 40 into the regulator which loses 10 volts, the amount of power available to the capacitors must be greater than simply using 30 volt rectified by virtue of the fact that the discharging time between the (now flattened) peaks is reduced.
The post regulator waveform (without caps) would look someting like a curvesided square wave (which i guess could bring its own problems). 
11th July 2001, 09:39 PM  #4 
diyAudio Member

Re power?? physics explanation
Jason,
some 'simple' physics tells your sort of right. Let me explain: First: voltage * current = power, nothing fancy about that. Second take a pure resistor R as load. With a normal sinewave voltage V there is sinewave current through the resistor. To calculate the power during one cycle you should take the Integralsum for all t of [(V sin t) squared] divided by R (which I don't have nearby). In the case of the flattend waveform this integralsum does add up to a larger amount of power. The maximum power is produced when the voltage is at its maximum during the whole cycle (which we normally call DC). 
11th July 2001, 09:48 PM  #5 
diyAudio Member

Re power?? cont'd
Jason,
there are some penalties however. 1: total power supply powerconsumtion rises also. the voltage above 30V is turned into heat. 2: the squar'ish waveform can be broken down into various sinewave with different frequencies (fourrier analysis) [called harmonics]. You want to make sure none of the 'harmonics' bleed through the PS to the amp. In theory increasing the frequency of the maininput voltage has the same effect. Jos 
11th July 2001, 11:00 PM  #6 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Poole, England

Reply to Dutch DIY
As previously mentioned the waveform would be similar to a sqaurewave with convex curved rising and falling edges  the mark/space ratio would be high and would as previously mentioned have higher power content than a sinewave that only peaks at the capped value.
I understand that there is potential for some of the harmonics to filter through, but sufficient reservoir capacitors would prevent that and they would have less time to discharge than if using sinusoidal waveforms. As for the heat  if you're running single ended class A then another few watts of heat is barely a consideration! 
12th July 2001, 07:24 PM  #7 
diyAudio Member

Re: physics
Jason,
I did a check on the calculus: * with a plain sinewave and pure resistor the power is 0.5 * (V squared / R) where V is the peak voltage of the sine wave. * in the case of + &  40V peak and + &  30V clip the power is 0.66 * V (30v) squared / R, an improvement thus of 30% over a normal sinewave. good luck. Jos 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
power regulators  Doovieman  Chip Amps  35  26th August 2007 08:46 PM 
Power supply regulators  udip  Power Supplies  2  4th February 2005 06:57 AM 
Local power regulators  jan.didden  Solid State  151  7th March 2004 12:07 PM 
New To Site?  Need Help? 