Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27th January 2006, 11:24 PM   #911
diyAudio Member
 
Susan-Parker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Default Re: Magnetic balanced topology

Hi Eric,

Please excuse the brevity of this reply, I have been quite busy of late.

Quote:
Originally posted by erictoucan
Hi Susan,

I find a thread www.bonavolta.ch/hobby/en/audio/2sk135se.htm

They call it SE Super Nemesis Compensated.

It has equivalent idea to my previously proposed magnetic balanced topology. But, I do not see the point of connecting the gate of balancing Mosfet to the collector output by 12K. What is the exact purpose in doing that? Do you see it?
The 12K connects the DC bias level to the capacitively coupled input giving the two mosfets the same bias levels.

BTW my understanding is that Jean Hiraga's original Nemesis had a transformer coupled input.

Quote:
Originally posted by erictoucan
Thank you for your remind, I think you are correct, take the same bias as the amplifying Mosfet to have exact balance. But, do we need that exact? Would 20% deviation significant? I think not and we can just use resistor or lamp of suitable resistance(no need for heatsink) to balance it without the mosfet.
The circuit as shown is a quasi push-pull and the mosfet is dynamically counter-balancing the current in the active mosfet (the two mosfets should thus ideally be matched).

Replacing this with a resistor is not going to be optimum.

I have (in Spice simulation) reordered the circuit to have followers (and a transformer input) and one can see the drive and balance currents. The second mosfet is clearly working for a living.

To my mind, given the relative circuit complexities, using a single mosfet with a gapped transformer is easier to understand and prototype. Once one has the basic circuit working additional stuff can be added.

Using a follower and a suitably large ungapped transformer one can drive single ended even with core magnetization and although not ideal the low impedance of the mosfet will produce more acceptable results than with a tube circuit, as is shown in my Zeus SE page:

http://www.susan-parker.co.uk/zeus-se-amp.htm

I am always interested to hear about variations and inspirations derived from this thread and look forward to reading about your progress.

Best wishes,
Susan.

P.S. I am using B2Spice V4 Pro
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2006, 11:40 PM   #912
diyAudio Member
 
Susan-Parker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Default Re: dual voice coil woofers

Hi Oliver

Quote:
Originally posted by el`Ol
I know this is the totally wrong thread, but I hoped to find some transformer experts here.
There is a Japanese Fullrange speaker with two voice coils and a transformer between, at least for low frequencies.
Interesting new fullrange drivers out of Japan
I ask myself whether a simple 1:1 transformer between the voice coils of a dual voice coil woofer would improve the performance in combination with a low dampening factor amplifier.
Regards, Oliver
The dual voice coil enables the additional components shown in the schematic to linearize the frequency response of this speaker.

I am not sure what benefit you would obtain with a conventional driver unless you were wanting to do something similar to match the driver's frequency response to a specific enclosure.

You can easily try this out with a toroid mains transformer using the dual secondaries as a 1:1 transformer - will need to be minimum of 300VA, probably higher - with a voltage that approximately matches the peak AC voltage output of the amplifier. Don't forget to insulate the primaries as they could give you a nasty shock otherwise.

Best wishes,
Susan.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2006, 11:41 AM   #913
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Send a message via ICQ to erictoucan Send a message via AIM to erictoucan Send a message via MSN to erictoucan Send a message via Yahoo to erictoucan
Default Magnetic Balanced SE

Hi Susan,

Well, I see the 2 Mosfets in Super Nemesis is basically biased by the voltage between the 2.2K pot. The 12 K resistor can be taken as a decoupling resistor between the signal and the bais. But, it we take a lamp of the same conductance of baised 2sk135 (0.65A) would do the same thing. If you can simulate it easily by program. Would you be interested to do it?

The next interesting thing I find interested to research is the forward transconductance of Mosfet. Can we design a circuit to correct the non-linear transconductance of non-feedback SE? Not by feedback of course.

Eric

28 Jan 2006
__________________
chung
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th January 2006, 01:26 AM   #914
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Hi erictoucan !

For linearization of output-devices you might look into the threads about "Lovoltech" J-FETs in the Pass forum. It should be possible to get some reduction of the second harmonic by using cascoded J-FETs.
As I said before: Your idea will work. Just go ahead.

Thorsten ( not that one )
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th January 2006, 08:14 PM   #915
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Send a message via ICQ to erictoucan Send a message via AIM to erictoucan Send a message via MSN to erictoucan Send a message via Yahoo to erictoucan
Hi thorstenlarsen,

Thank you very much for your concern. Your idea and comment really helpful. I want to go ahead with my design. But, I am lazy and doing this part time. So, as long as I got opportunity to experiment it, I will let you know right away. So, many staff in my head Career, Finance, Philosophy. Audio development for good sounding world. As one of your interest, I always try to develope audio gear within my desired philosophy. Thank you very much for your support again.

Cheers

Eric

30 Jan 2006
__________________
chung
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th January 2006, 09:49 PM   #916
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Hi Eric !

I can understand you. I`m lazy too. And it seems like we share some other interests too.
Hope to hear from you again.

Thorsten ( not that one )
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2006, 12:32 PM   #917
jkeny is offline jkeny  Ireland
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dublin
Hi all

I wonder if there could be a sonic comparison posted between this unusual design amp and some recognised reference amps, AKSA etc

I presume some people have now built a variant of this design and feedback on sonics would be helpful for others thinking of embarking on this path.

John
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2006, 02:12 PM   #918
jkeny is offline jkeny  Ireland
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dublin
bump
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2006, 10:02 PM   #919
diyAudio Member
 
Susan-Parker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Hi John,

Thanks for your posts.

Quote:
Originally posted by jkeny
Hi all

I wonder if there could be a sonic comparison posted between this unusual design amp and some recognized reference amps, AKSA etc

I presume some people have now built a variant of this design and feedback on sonics would be helpful for others thinking of embarking on this path.

John
Mike posted a review on this thread - Audition of the Zeus - Post #570

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...135#post528135

Quote:
Originally posted by jkeny
bump
?

I have asked a friend knowledgeable in these matters, who listened to my system this December just passed, if he could write something up for me to post to this thread. This will hopefully be in a few days time.

Best wishes,
Susan.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2006, 10:18 PM   #920
jkeny is offline jkeny  Ireland
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dublin
Thanks Susan,

I read the very positive review you referenced and was hoping that others who have built the amps would also post their experiences etc.

Maybe this will follow in time - I look forward to the new review you mentioned

John
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (1 members and 1 guests)
True Sound
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24 PM.

Page generated in 0.11276 seconds (71.98% PHP - 28.02% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio