|Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
||Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|9th October 2004, 01:38 PM||#31|
Join Date: Jan 2004
I think it's brilliant. Only 9 components - that puts 47Labs claim to shame
I think people forget that some speakers have transformers, Quad electrostatics and Audax gold dome piezo tweeter to name but two.
The design is the polar opposite to some, like Hawksford et al. with their ever increasing complexity.
Yet our hearing is very sensitive to location, and not so sensitive to distortion, so your design is probably more attuned to our hearing abilities than most, something that you have hinted at in your description. The use of line array speakers probably emphasises its strengths in this respect.
Should I dump all my current projects for this minimal approach? what a dilemma
|9th October 2004, 01:42 PM||#32|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Mmmm... I like this amp - not a P-channel fet in sight!
You can do fun things with it by adding a second identical centre-tapped winding to the output transformer and feed the drains with it, the centre tap going to + volts of course. Then add a coupling cap from each drain to the opposite source. All is revealed in the diagram here:
from the thread here:
Tetrahedron output stage topology.
Best-ever T/S parameter spreadsheet.
|9th October 2004, 04:28 PM||#33|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London, UK.
Re: You mange to get me totally lost
Also I have put in a lot of design effort into this amplifier and then been constantly pooh pooed by "those that know" so I must admit to have been a bit anxious about airing it publicaly on the forum.
Most people tell me to ditch the transformers - totally missing the point - and use conventional circuits. What is the point of that sort of comment? It then just becomes another "me too" design and I wouldn't have started on this path in the first place if what was available worked properly.
>> Single chamber bobbin, EI 96 x 45.7mm
>> Quad Filar wound,
> meaning 2 x primary and 2 x secondary windings all side by side ?
Yes. See, not so hard to understand.
This is the key design feature of the output transformer, and why it is NOT the same as a valve transformer.
>> 0.80mm insulated copper wire
> Is this empirical, or do you design on internal resistance or current density ? How do you scale this with output power
Mainly empirical although I did do some maths - long forgotton.
I have a transformer for a certain power over the bandwidth I want to attain.
For 25 Hz to 250 kHz small signal bandwidth I have determined a rough rule of thumb that I needed four times the VA mains rating for the peek wattage I could have (for a 1:1 output that's supply rail x 2 across the load impedance - nominally 8 ohms). So for 50 watts peak I need 200 VA core section.
To scale with a bigger core I would check the bobbin cross section and see how large a diameter of wire I could fit whilst maintaining the same number of turns - i.e. keeping the same(ish) inductance.
For a 75W tranformer I was going to use 1.0 mm wire and for a biggie to push 120 watts plus I was going to use 1.2 mm wire.
If I didn't want the bass response - say I was filtering from 200 Hz - then I could use a smaller core section.
>> No insulation between layers.
> Why is this important (or unimportant) ?
Because mains transformer manufacturers are used to puting the tape in and look puzzled when there isn't any between the primaries and secondaries. So I explicity stated the fact rather then assume it would be understood.
>> Terminations; to tags on bobbin:
> I take it take you are not really centre tapping from one winding (or that the 2 primary windings are not ends on.
Nope, you are correct in the first instance - all four windings done simutaniously. hence quad-filar.
>> 2 x Primary:
>> 12 full layers ( approx. 144 turns each).
>> Start and finish at same side of bobbin
>> 2 x Secondary:
>> 6 + 6 full layers ( approx. 72 + 72 turns each).
>> Start and finish at same side of bobbin ( opposite side from
> What do you mean by 6+6 ?
> In your circuit, you showed a secondary with a centre tap (in dotted lines). Are you using a step down ratio of 4 (i.e. no of turns in primary = 4 x no of turns in secondary) ?
The schematic is the simple version. For the amp in the pic (and this winding specification) I have made provision for configuring the secondary for different impedance loudspeakers. So I split the secondaries in half to get four seperate sections which can then be configured as required.
>> Primary: Start Finish
>> Winding 1: 22 24
>> Winding 2: 25 27
> What do the numbers 22, 24, 25,27 refer to ?
>> Secondary: Start Finish Start Finish
>> Winding 3: 13 15 17 19
>> Winding 4: 14 16 18 20
> Same question as above.
These are the tag numbers on the bobbins that I was using and therefor specified to the transformer manufacturer so I knew which winding went where.
>> Starting from same bobbin end, wind all four for 6 layers,
> All 4 meaning 2 x primary and 2 x secondary, each 0.8mm dia. ?
Not this time.
All four is 2 x primary and 2 x secondary.
Start with four wires from four spools stacked together on a broom handle wedged into a filing cabinate draw (this last bit is optional).
Wind six layers.
Pull out two of the four wires in a loop which will connect to the appropriate tags.
Return the loop so one still has four seperate wires.
Wind six layers.
Wrap in tape and then cut the ends of the wires to length and solder to the tags.
(I would varnish impregnate but I don't have the facilities to do that muself.)
Assemble laminate and attach frame.
I hand wind the output transformers, holding the bobbin in one hand and feeding the wires with the other. It takes about 20 minuits to half an hour.
> Thank you in advance for enlightening.
My pleasure. I hope it now makes some sense.
|9th October 2004, 06:24 PM||#34|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Great City of Turnhout, Belgium
Blog Entries: 7
Your posts are a refreshing, filled with content, in a forum that was in danger to become a marketplace of people shouting 'hey, I KNOW this should be so-and-so, trust me' or 'I have spoken in 1985 to so-and-so and he agreed I am right'.
Thanks very much.
I won't make the tactical error to try to dislodge with rational arguments a conviction that is beyond reason - Daniel Dennett
Check out Linear Audio Vol 7!
|9th October 2004, 07:49 PM||#38|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Auburn, CA, USA
I hope you are not going to put Miss Parker to task because of the lack of feedback in her design.......................
|9th October 2004, 07:52 PM||#40|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silicon Valley
Very interesting - I have a few good-sized silicon steel toroids I may use to wind output transformers to try this out. The only down side is possibly dying of boredom while winding. I'm no stranger to layering and multifilar techniques for reducing leakage/extending bandwidth in transformers, as I design switching power supplies for a living and wind all the prototype transformers myself. This project goes in the pile with the 3-4 other projects that haven't been boxed/listened to just yet, so it may be quite a while before I report resuts. What thickness laminations were used for the output transformer?
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|New To Site?||Need Help?|