|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Hannover
|
Is there any limitation in the lowest possible/practical value
for the emitter resistor of a push-pull BJT output stage? I want to parallel multiple 2SA1943/2SC5200 transistors. My simulation shows that decreasing the value of the emitter resistor value significally reduces the distortion generated in a triple EF. This is because gm is higher, more linear and also spread over a wider voltage band which redueces crossover distortion in a class AB output stage. Because real transistors are not equal they have to be selected. My transistors used (all the same datecode and bought from Arrow) are selected to about 2mV Ube. Out of a lot of 25 I have differencies in Vbc of nearly 40mV. Currently I'm ended with a value of 0.12ohm, with about 70ma for each transistor. This results in a voltage drop of about 9mV across the emitter resistors. When mounting these multiple transistor bank to a heatsink (0.5 K/W) in two banks of 3 at the upper and 3 the lower side of the heatsink, I expect a thermal difference between these two banks from maybe 5K (not measured yet). This would result in a current difference between this two banks of about 30%. The question is: May the value of the resistors lowered further or will this result in thermal instability? (I have some amps seen blown by this effect!) |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Animal farm
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Lowering the value of the output emitter resistors much more may get you into layout effects; the individual traces' inherant resistance may start to become significant.
MOSFETs without the equivalent emitter resistors aren't uncommon, but I'll bet you'll need at least .1 ohm to help make a bipolar design reasonably bullet-proof. Carefully matching gain and thermal conditions would possibly help. How many transistors can you afford to blow up testing your hypothesis? How much lower is distortion in your simulation with lower emitter values? I'm using .27 ohm in my Leach amp simply because I had a supply of those parts, but I also have .22 and .1. I wanted to try banks of four and five pairs with higher rail voltages, but my supply of output transistors is very limited, and so is my budget! |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: berkeley ca
|
In general you should have 12-22mV across each emitter resistor. Going too low will cause problems, not only in thermal instability, BUT with the transistion between class A and class AB. Going too high will also cause added distortion in the transition between class A and class AB.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
imho adding more output pairs will give u the same effect as lowering the resistors ,but will be "safer"
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Left Coast
|
Rather than simularing different values, I tried it once some time ago. 0.1R is a stated above the lowest. (Actually it is hard to find ordinary sandcast resistors below this value.) However, using a themocouple to measure how hot the ouput devices became I concluded that 0.1R was too small to dependably prevent "current hogging". Sometimes it is Ok and sometimes not. Closely matching output transistors may well make the lower value sufficient.
On the other hand 0.22R never showed any sign of "current hogging" (as reflected by temperature). BTW, I used the temperatur of the output devices as as indicator because the DMM I had at the time wasn't real accurate with low R values and voltages the calculated current was a little ambiguous. In addition to lower distortion using the lowest RE values you get a small bonus of a couple more watts! |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Animal farm
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: berkeley ca
|
Mikek, you don't know what you are talking about.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Build it up, debug it, then do this test:
Hit one output device with a heatgun, and monitor it's current. The resistor needs to be large enough to prevent thermal runaway. Don't let the amp sit powered up without supervision until you're sure it won't go into thermal runaway. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Seattle, WA U.S.A.
|
Hi John Thanks for input on this tyopic i asume that the 12-20Mv be the target voltage and select your actuial resistor value to obtain a 12-20 mV reading across each emitter resistor at your operating current and so the actual resistor values should be selected to acomidate these conditions is this correct?
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Do we always need an emitter follower to drive a LATFET output stage??? | Leolabs | Solid State | 37 | 9th January 2011 04:16 PM |
| four transistor emitter follower (diamond buffer) as power output stage? | capslock | Solid State | 99 | 14th September 2010 09:17 PM |
| CFP output emitter resistors | ian_elvar | Solid State | 17 | 3rd March 2008 06:40 PM |
| Class (A)B output stage: why 2 emitter resistors, why not 1? | deleveld | Solid State | 23 | 13th December 2006 06:10 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10480 seconds (82.55% PHP - 17.45% MySQL) with 11 queries |