ESL Direct Drive SS amp - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17th June 2002, 08:51 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Torrance, CA
Default ESL Direct Drive SS amp

Folks:

I've touched on this a few times in some other threads.

I'm interested in building some (curved) electrostatic speakers for a home theater setup. I'd like to do four but two is definite - I can arc the front two enough so that the listening couch will be in the primary arc of the speaker output. This thread isn't about that

The speakers, according to Wagner, would be 8Kv. Even with a 63v rails, (200watt roughly) with a 75:1 step up transformer, that's only 4725v!

I was planning on six Opti-MOS amplifiers for a home theater and I've gotten the following information from Randy Sloan:

Quote:
I'm not aware of any types of high-voltage L-MOSFETs available, and going to D-MOS families would probably destroy the fidelity you are trying to achieve with electrostatic speakers. Some of the "double-die" L-MOSFETs available have Vds parameters of 200-volts, and by going with cascoded outputs (commonly called "totem poleing"), you can raise the maximum rail potentials to 400-volts. This technique would raise the maximum peak-to-peak capabilities with L-MOSFETs (not bipolars) to 800-volts. Of course, this is still a far cry from 8-Kv.

(Randy Sloan)
This is interesting though:
Quote:
I still believe that L-MOSFETs are the best output devices for the application you are considering, since they are much more immune to reactive loading than bipolar devices. (Randy Sloan)
I've been thinking of a Class D or T amp, as I may be able to find a switching transistor that's capable of higher voltages. From email generated from the Class-T thread:


Quote:
Driving an 8kV panel directly will require some very VERY exotic output devices. So exotic, in fact, that I haven't found any either. There are a few good candidates in the 1kV range from ST, however, which would allow for a fairly modest turns ratio from your output transformer. Take a look at the STU7NB100 as a possibility. It's Rdson is 1.5 Ohms, so efficiency goes out the window, but I'm guessing you're not all that concerned with efficiency when contemplating an 8kV power supply anyway.

I really think an output transformer is the way to go. The money you will spend on the transformers is offset somewhat by being able to use a less expensive power supply and less expensive (and far more robust) output devices.
Given that it's seemingly difficult to find high voltage output devices (yes, I know, tubes, that's another thread), I'm thinking now of just building the Opti-MOS and go for a high voltage rail, with subsequently lower power.

Rather surprisingly, the amp that this will replace, an SA-500 from Techniques (yes, ancient) was listed as a 55w amp, but I checked the voltage across the filter and it's high (something like 45 volts, 87 or so rail to rail). So the rail voltage is a lot higher than a 55w amp would normally be, so I'm going to size my replacement Opti-MOS amp for at least that.

I'm eventually going to bi-amp a woofer in the same cabinet as the ESL, so I'm going to build six Opti-MOS's now 'regular'. I'm trying to pick the output voltage of the transformer, I may just pick 90VCT to give a high drive voltage. My feeling is that if I custom wind a 16ohm output transformer for the ESL, I wouldn't be in that high of a wattage but would get the drive voltage I need. The 75:1 output transformers with a 90VCT don't get close to 8Kv anyway, which would explain why some people say ESL's require 'powerfull amps'.

It just doesn't look like a solid state amp can do 8Kv and still be 'hifi'.

Thoughts?
__________________
== John ==
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2002, 09:18 PM   #2
The one and only
 
Nelson Pass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Just because you bias the panels at 8 KV doesn't mean
you want to drive them that high.

You can cascode gain devices with high voltage Mosfets
or tubes and get enough swing, say 2KV p-p.

Your other alternative is to put some feedback around the
step up transformer. This worked miracles with my old
Dayton-Wrights.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2002, 10:06 PM   #3
Kevinbd is offline Kevinbd  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Swindon, U.K.
Default Re: ESL Direct Drive SS amp

Hiya,

That is one thing that has interested me over the years, building a direct drive amp for my quad electrostats.

I seen a circuit in a audio amatuer book. The amp however, was a monster!

I read awhile back in a hi-fi mag that a company called EAR had made an amp for some quad 63's
and the sound quality was stunning.

Does anyone know anything about this product/circuit or know of any DD amps for quad's ?

Would be interested.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2002, 10:58 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Harlowton, MT, USA
There are TV Horiz. output transistors rated up to about 1.7kV, also, high power IGBT's (switching) can also be found in this voltage range. No MOSFET's that I can find though, and no compliments to the devices mentioned above, so you'd have to go with a quasi-comp. or single enged OPS.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2002, 11:53 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
MRehorst's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Since you're going to build the ESLs anyway, you can dramatically reduce their drive requirements by making the insulators thinner.

Making the insulators thinner reduces max spl out, unless you raise the crossover point, and results in lowering the drive voltage requirement.

You're going to want to use bass drivers anyway (the ESLs will sound a bit too 'thin', otherwise, especially for movies which tend to emphasize very low bass for special effects), so by raising the crossover point you can maintain the max spl and ease the drive requirements at the same time.

I'm afraid I can't give you any numbers on max spl versus drive voltage- that's where you have to experiment. It is also a function of the size you make the panels. Also, curving the panels has very little effect on high frequency dispersion. Curving large panels is primarily a means of stiffening the structure.

I've been looking at Sloan's OptiMOS amp myself recently. I like the design and philosophy behind it. I especially like the protection for the amp and for the speakers, something lacking in a lot of other so-called "high-end" designs. Let us know how they work out for you.

MR
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2002, 12:10 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Torrance, CA
Mark:

I was planning on the 'Compact no compromise TL' speaker as detailed in Wagner, but I don't have the book with me (Ok, I'm at work ). I completly agree, OTTOMH I believe the cross over between the Transmission line woofer and the ESL was 500Hz. I think that even with that, he still spec'd an 8Kv drive voltage, which is why I mentioned 8Kv in the thread, but I'll double check. Then again, this was a 'no compromise' design.

What I'll probably do is do a regular Opti-MOS for now, more for bi-amping existing 8 ohm speakers, then wire up a special version with say 100 or 200v rails, and wind my own transformers for the exact voltage I need.

I'll let you know how it works, I'm ordering all the parts this week. I have a couple of old Technics 3 way's with 8" woofers that I'll use once I get the Opti-MOS wired up, just to test.

It's interesting what you said about curving the panels - as I'm crossing over at 500hz, I wonder if a flat panel would work as well? I can put a beam deflector behind the speakers to bounce the sound to my wife but would prefer to make it wider dispersion if possible. I don't care if it's curved or not, just so the entire couch can hear the sound. This is in a large room (24x24 or so, cathedral ceiling).

For the center speaker, I was thinking of using a flat panel, as if I turn it sideways under the projector screen (12' wide), it'll hit the entire couch anyway, as long as you are sitting down. So I could build a flat panel first to test. I can build the curved stretching rig but not looking forward to that.
__________________
== John ==
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2002, 01:02 AM   #7
jam is offline jam  United States
diyAudio Member
 
jam's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Auburn, CA, USA
John,

I believe Plitron might have a 100:1 step up transformer or ypu could try Sowther in England.

Jam
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2002, 01:38 AM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
phishead8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Pasadena, CA
John,
I built a pair of ESLs and used a step-up transformer, so that I didn't have to worry about the cursed direct-drive. But, in order to understand it, I measured the voltage of my stators while they were playing. I'm not sure if I did this correctly but, here are the results.
Volume: moderate listening level
Bias: <2KV (any more and I would get arcing. I messed up in construction)
Spacing: 3/32 + a little for glue.
AC Voltage Reading on Fluke 23 AFTER 50:1 step-up transformer: ~40 Volts. That's right: 40 Volts. The voltage would fluctuate with music volume, as expected. Now, I don't know what frequency the meter thought it was reading. Perhaps the meter couldn't accurately measure higher frequencies, but it still shocked me.
It doesn't seem logical to me for your stators to swing 8 kilovolts. Aim for something much more reasonable and put as much bias as you can on your membrane. Good Luck.
-Dan
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2002, 02:08 AM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Torrance, CA
Dan:

Is the Fluke a true RMS meter? If not, I'd guess that the non-sine waveform would mess up the reading, but I'm with you, 40 volts is 'shocking' (and I'll excuse the pun although it was pretty funny).

I'll research the 8Kv tonight - it came righout out of Wagner's book.
__________________
== John ==
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2002, 05:22 AM   #10
Dave is offline Dave  New Zealand
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: New Zealand
Roger Sanders suggests in the final chapter of his book (which you really should read if you haven't) that the best way to go could be an amplifier that puts out around 500v p-p combined with a transformer with a smaller than usual turns ratio say 10:1 compared to 50:1 or even 100:1. As he says we have the technology avaliable all that's required is a designer to sit down and do it.

That advantage is the a 10:1 transformer will perform much better (frequency response) than a 50:1 also this will greatly reduce the capacitance seen by the amplifier. If you enclose it in a feedback loop as Mr Pass suggested you could have a real winner.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
direct drive ribbon amp hancock Pass Labs 39 28th November 2012 08:55 PM
ESL Direct Drive Atom666 Planars & Exotics 6 5th October 2008 08:09 AM
Direct Drive fun!!! Cobra2 Analogue Source 32 20th January 2007 02:23 AM
Another direct drive thread maudio Planars & Exotics 18 25th June 2006 06:53 PM
Technics direct drive SL-D35 Jason1976 Analogue Source 1 15th May 2006 06:28 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:27 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2