DC Offset circuit for Threshold
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
 10th September 2004, 02:45 AM #1 deafbykhorns   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: florida DC Offset circuit for Threshold What would be an easy way to adjust DC offset in this circuit? I know the typical way with most AB amps is a 100k pot at base of inverter, series 300k resistor at base and + & - 15v at each side of pot. Heres the schematic http://www.munsonandbryan.com/400a.tif[/IMG] Would this dc offset schematic work in circuit? http://www.munsonandbryan.com/dc offset.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]
 10th September 2004, 09:41 PM #2 anatech   diyAudio Moderator     Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Georgetown, On Hi John, How much DC offset are you trying to get rid of? -Chris
 11th September 2004, 03:02 AM #3 deafbykhorns   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: florida The offset is 76mv on one channel. Offset on other channel is about 45mv This is not acceptable with high efficiency speakers. I know matching the outputs will help but that could be expensive and time consuming.
 11th September 2004, 02:22 PM #4 anatech   diyAudio Moderator     Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Georgetown, On Hi John, Okay, don't modify the circuit. Match the 6571 pair. The Hfe circuit on small digital meters will work fine for this. This will drop your DC offset to a low value and improve the sound. While you're in there, replace the 470uF 16V cap unless it's new. You can calculate the value of DC offset closely by dividing the tail current by two. Divide the figure by the Hfe of a 6571 transistor. Multiply this by 9400 plus the output DC resistance of the preamp. This unit does not have a DC reference to ground for the input. Not nice! You could hang a resistor from somewhere on the input to true ground (not the RCA jack ground). If you were to unplug the source from the amp. the DC output voltage will rise from X mV to some undesireable level. -Chris
 11th September 2004, 02:22 PM #5 deafbykhorns   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: florida DJK says to replace 300ohm with 10turn 500ohm. I experimented with paralleling pot, it took about 280ohm to increase offset by 10mv. If I do the opposite by increasing the resistance, it seems that it would take about 400-500ohms to get 0 offset. Would this not decrease the current to diff pair and change the general performance of the circuit.
 11th September 2004, 02:25 PM #6 anatech   diyAudio Moderator     Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Georgetown, On Oh yeah, a bit. Why not correct the problem at the source?
 11th September 2004, 09:25 PM #7 EchoWars   diyAudio Member     Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Left of the Dial The offset is due to the difference in base currents in the 6571 pair. By increasing the 300 ohm resistance, you lower the tail current, and thus lower the base current for both transistors, and offset goes down. This isn't the way to solve the problem, as output drive for this stage decreases with decreased tail current. Put in a pair of high-gain transistors, matched as closely as you can get them. High-gain NPN's are fairly easy to locate...perhaps a 2SC1775 or a Zetex ZTX694B (I've used the Zetex in this capacity with very good results). With a tail current of about 2 1/2mA, and no provisions for adjustment, you will be lucky to get offset down below 20mV no matter how close you match transistors. But it is certainly about your only option besides radically changing circuit parameters (not recommended) or adding a servo (not a bad idea, but not as easy as maching transistors).
 11th September 2004, 09:41 PM #8 anatech   diyAudio Moderator     Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Georgetown, On As long as the DC offset is below 50mV, who cares? You won't damage the speakers until the offset gets much higher. Echowars, with matched transistors, I routinely get the DC offset within a few mV of my calculated values for a given circuit design. It really isn't that difficult to do. John, what is happening that causes you to want to reduce the DC offset? If you get a turn on/off thump, then there are transients that are causing this. You will not get a sound from a steady DC offset across your speakers at these magnitudes. If you plug and unplug your speakers withthe amp running (no sound), you may hear a faint click. That's all this does. Any change in the input impedance of this amp will cause a bigger noise than this offset. Did you calculate the expected DC offset of this amplifier? -Chris
 12th September 2004, 05:15 AM #9 djk diyAudio Member     Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: USA "This unit does not have a DC reference to ground for the input. " The schematic shows 4K7 + 10K + 390R = 15K09 to ground. The AC input impedance will be much higher than 15K due to the bootstap action.
EchoWars
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Left of the Dial
Quote:
 Originally posted by anatech As long as the DC offset is below 50mV, who cares? You won't damage the speakers until the offset gets much higher.
But you're not receiving the full benefit of the distortion cancelation abilities of the diff pair. We're tweakers, remember? 0.00V offset is da goal.
Quote:
 Echowars, with matched transistors, I routinely get the DC offset within a few mV of my calculated values for a given circuit design. It really isn't that difficult to do.
Your meter is better than my meter. I bow to you Sir. (thermal parameters also make this difficult, but U know that)

Getting offset down as low as possible just happens to be a fetish with some of us. Don't necessarily have to have a reason, other than to know that 1mV is better than 100mV.

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Site     Site Announcements     Forum Problems Amplifiers     Solid State     Pass Labs     Tubes / Valves     Chip Amps     Class D     Power Supplies     Headphone Systems Source & Line     Analogue Source     Analog Line Level     Digital Source     Digital Line Level     PC Based Loudspeakers     Multi-Way     Full Range     Subwoofers     Planars & Exotics Live Sound     PA Systems     Instruments and Amps Design & Build     Parts     Equipment & Tools     Construction Tips     Software Tools General Interest     Car Audio     diyAudio.com Articles     Music     Everything Else Member Areas     Introductions     The Lounge     Clubs & Events     In Memoriam The Moving Image Commercial Sector     Swap Meet     Group Buys     The diyAudio Store     Vendor Forums         Vendor's Bazaar         Sonic Craft         Apex Jr         Audio Sector         Acoustic Fun         Chipamp         DIY HiFi Supply         Elekit         Elektor         Mains Cables R Us         Parts Connexion         Planet 10 hifi         Quanghao Audio Design         Siliconray Online Electronics Store         Tubelab     Manufacturers         AKSA         Audio Poutine         Musicaltech         Aussie Amplifiers         CSS         exaDevices         Feastrex         GedLee         Head 'n' HiFi - Walter         Heatsink USA         miniDSP         SITO Audio         Twin Audio         Twisted Pear         Wild Burro Audio

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post cm961 Parts 5 5th February 2015 05:36 PM sapek Pass Labs 0 22nd November 2007 01:09 AM hifi-hospital Solid State 10 25th February 2007 08:26 AM whalefat Solid State 3 13th April 2005 10:13 AM wahee Digital Source 0 6th October 2004 10:31 PM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:41 AM.