|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bandung
|
I just attend a local "Hearing Session", to compare some commercial power amps. Some of the people there claims theirself to be "Audiophile"(but with no electronic understanding)
I found an interesting thing. Some amp have what they say "3D sound reproduction". The singer is sitting in front, while the music is in far background, it can be heared with closed eyes. The drums are in far left, the piano.... etc, just like reading a map. With another amp, the whole sound (singer+music) just at the same place, in a wall just right infront of me. No "depth" in music. All the people there loves the amp with that 3D Depth sound reproduction. They say the more expensive an amp, this effect is more obvious (is this true?) We are not talking about digital delay thing here, just plain analog amp compared with analog power amp. No time delay, no fancy processor. What makes an analog audio amp can make a good "depth"? Is there a trick in the designing process? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
i sell the stuff for a living, so the most non-technical way to explain it is this...
a cd is recorded in stereo, or at least mixed in that way. if it is live, or mixed in a studio environment, there is depth and a 3d recording. certiain things are farther away than others, and some things are more left than others. so simply, if the reproduction is accurate, these sublteties should come through with the playback as well. some speakers are very good at doing this. in my opinion, it has to do most with the speakers, then the amp, then the source, then the preamp. but the amp and speakers have a huge role in this. ive had several cds where the recording is such that certain notes actually come from behind you. there are a couple of DVD-audios where this happens in 2-channel. this is just a phasing thing. with my system, i can hear things on the side of me, and sometimes (rarely) behind me. it is not uncommon to hear things further out than the speakers, or behind, or in front of them. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
The 44.1Khz PCM format itself also forces some information loss since phase differences between channels are quantized in 22.7uS increments [sampling period] while analog recording can store almost infinite phase differences between channels. Anyway, 44.1Khz PCM stores enough information to make the effects clearly perceptible It's not so hard to create such recordings, just place two identycal mics with its sensing elements about 20cm away one from the other and record each into a channel. Move sound sources around the mics and then listen to the results with matched speakers preferably outdoors or in a very dead room, or also with headpones Even cheap electronics tends to have enough channel matching and separation to not alter that phase-difference information, but selling electronics is much easier than selling loudspeakers or room treatments. Actually I only enjoy to listen music outdoors, rooms are very very frustrating, particularly smaller ones Most 'audioplhiles' know nothing about acoustics and blame electronic equipment when his wife moves a carpet or something in the listening room and 'something changes in the sound'. Sound waves interact with every single object or surface in the room before reaching our ears and these interactions are somewhat 1,000 times stronger than the ones caused by electronics... |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bandung
|
The room is the same, the speaker is the same, the position is the same, the AC line is the same, the CD is the same, the cables are the same, the crowd is the same, everything is the same.
Just change the amp, then other amp, then other amp. Why one amp has more "Depth" than the other? How to make this? |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cool end of a soldering iron NW of Toronto
|
Quote:
__________________
I.Q.Test. Have you ever purchased a recreational snowmobile? |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Shropshire, England
|
Interestingly, the '3D' effect is sometimes more obvious in amps with relatively high crosstalk between channels. The effect has been exploited in several psychoacoustic processors, but I haven't yet come across an explanation for it.
Certainly, one of the best defined soundstages I've heard came from an ancient Armstrong amp with audible crosstalk, and I once had a startling experience of realism (in this respect) from an ultra-cheap Amstrad music centre which I was repairing for a friend. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gütersloh
|
Quote:
much more exact phasing due to antialiasing. I used this effect in my 3d-soundroutines, where i had the problem that i had to use accurate phaseshifting with 22khz output. With hires interpolation between samples (phaseaccurate) you completely knock out this problem. This antialiasing happens automatically when converting from analog to digital. The phaseshifting is very subtile, but the brain uses this information to locate the sound in a 180degree-circle. Given an eardistance of 20cm, a sound 10meters away, rotated 90deg you get a phaseshift of 1.16ms, going to zero if the sound is exact in front of you (or behind) Elevation of the sound and detecting if its front/back, does the ear by checking reflections and filtering inside the ear, even the reflection from shoulder is important. Mike |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Prague,Czech Republic
|
So called 3 D sound have three requirements : amp with very low crosstalk, very low distortion ( mainly at low output levels ) and record, which is made directly ( which is not mixed from many track, 'cos it is for this effect grave).
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Koskenkorva Land
|
"3D" is just another subtle description of so called "sound stage".
A tend to back up behind UE's words. Also many loudspeakers can't reproduce a "soundstage" very well, and there are even super expensive loudspeakers which don't even have a linear frequencies/time -domain reproduction which is even a much worse problem than for amplifiers. Cheers
__________________
"If transistors are blueberries and FETs are strawberries, then tubes must be.. pears" Michael 29th January 2010 |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Knoxville
|
I have a couple of 15" KLH 'linear dynamics' model speakers and they reproduce the 3D sound effect really well, even through just one channel. They are 4Ohm speakers though.
Eva has made a good point that the room acoustics have the most to do with the sound.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Nature's sound reproduction... | Vikash | Everything Else | 0 | 10th August 2008 12:13 AM |
| New boy looking for proper sound reproduction | NJE807 | Introductions | 3 | 7th April 2008 03:19 PM |
| Transient Perfect reproduction | Thunau | Multi-Way | 0 | 24th July 2006 01:18 AM |
| sound reproduction and distortion | tech.knockout | Multi-Way | 13 | 16th March 2004 04:40 PM |
| My philosophy on audio reproduction | RADIOLEE | Everything Else | 27 | 8th August 2002 06:35 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13211 seconds (82.09% PHP - 17.91% MySQL) with 10 queries |