|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#581 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indore , India
|
Thanks Lars,
I will try this new version of the Zeta shortly Rajeev
__________________
RL |
|
|
|
|
#582 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New York (Upstate)
|
Hi Lars:
I posted a message not long ago, what about the 1000W version, have we abandoned this? Or will this be back around? I'm still very interested! |
|
|
|
|
#583 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Romania
|
Quote from www.oliveaudio.com
Quote:
Valentin |
|
|
|
|
|
#584 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Willowdale
|
Quote:
A few questions for my own education if I may? I am correct the context of the changing of the 63V bypassing caps was with respect to the larger +-V supply rails, wher ethe working voltage of the bypass cap would be raised to a value reasonability larger than the +-V supply rails one wanted to use? Of more interest to me how the actual capacitance value of the bypass caps for the output devices. I am not questiong the design value chosen, just the how it is determined. I have seen different N-Channel designs that will use 330uF, 100uF, et al for the bypass caps, and in some cases paralleled with a non-polar cap. The prior version of the Zeta used 47uF as the bypass caps, and some designs use a set of bypass caps at each end of the output device rail. All I am asking is hwta factors, design considerations and formulas are used to determine what the values should be or suggest the ball park value. Part of the reasoning for these questions is in case I find it useful to "tune" or experiment with values if an amp will be dedicated to a frequency band aka active crossover based system. As a side question seeeing as the output devices are connected to the +-V rail which has large filter caps, why are these caps on the output device rails needed? Sorry for the question, but I am trying to understand the why. I am not questioning estabilshed design practices, just trying to exapnd my understanding. Regards, John L. Males Willowdale, Ontario Canada 30 November 2005 02:43 |
||
|
|
|
|
#585 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Hi John L. Males, The Bypass Caps are used to BYPASS the Noise, arised from the spray of harmonics into the power supply when large currents are being conducted through output devices.....Thus these helps in Bypassing the Noise to the Ground... regards, K a n w a r
__________________
It's a fruitless endeavor to try and educate a fool that rejoices in ignorance
|
|
|
|
|
|
#586 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Though you have overcome the rail loss at -Ve rail...But what about the Rail Loss at + Rails...or is it that you have symmetrified the rail loss of negative rail in comparision to the existing rail loss of positive rail...... Why haven't you Tried to split the Driver [Rail to Gate resistors] resistors in 2 equal value, than bootstrapped them with the Caps From their midpoint to the output node.....Giving you Rail to Rail swing in both polarities....... regards, K a n w a r
__________________
It's a fruitless endeavor to try and educate a fool that rejoices in ignorance
|
|
|
|
|
|
#587 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New York (Upstate)
|
Lars:
I guess I'd like to hear from you most. I see the new 320W version of the Zeta, and you say it's as simple as adding new bypass caps w/ raised voltage and adding output devices, does the old 1000 w design work that was posted a while ago, or how should we approach this? Please could you post a separate schematic for 1000W version, and has anyone tested this yet? Anyone know any proven designs for MOSFET 1000W or so power levels w/ DIY schematics available? |
|
|
|
|
#588 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Lars,
Sounds like a very interesting project. I need a subwoofer amp and I`ve got a bunch of IRF150N`s, two 2x38V 800VA toroids and lots of aluminium. I also have 20 mallory caps 23000uf, but they are only rated for 50V , is series connecting a bad idea?It would be nice to see your Zeta schematic, but I can`t find it on your website, I can only see the front page. When I click "read more" the front page just shows up again...maybe its just me... (and the schematic links in this thread doesn`t work)Best regards, Peter |
|
|
|
|
#589 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Romania
|
Cheers from Romania.
Valentin |
|
|
|
|
#590 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Lab
|
Merry Christmas
Valentin: BTW incredible christmas decoration you have in Bucharest this year!!! I have never seen anything like this before! Peter: Here is the Schematics of ZETA320: www.oliveaudio.com/nch2.gif (Hope this helps!) The ZETA is a low cost alternative with a lot of muscle. Of course not 'high end' but then the price of building it is incredibly low. So for a subwoofer can be the perfect amplifier.
__________________
www.newclassd.com |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12396 seconds (77.92% PHP - 22.08% MySQL) with 11 queries |