|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Anonymityville
|
I acquired a blown car amplifier for some parts I needed for my amp of the same model. I was wondering if it is possible to stack the 2 toroids from the blown amp in parallel with the ones on the good amp? With my lamens way of thinking this would effectively double the current capacity of that part of the power supply, correct?
Thanks in advance, Sean |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Nottingham, England
|
If the toroid your'e refering to is the transformer in the switching power supply then connecting another in parallel will bring no benefit and will probably destroy the devices that drive it.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: United states
|
Quote:
To double the power availble to your amps amplifier section you would need to recreate the whole smps and then figure out a way to tie it in and get both smps's to share, and then you'd need to increase the output capacity of the amplifier. It would be easier just to buy another amp, but hey, what would you learn. Cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
In the unregulated push-pull transformer-coupled SMPS topology used in most car audio amplifiers you can safely paralell identycal transformers as long ad the windings are connected properly [same polarities]. Once it works, remember to glue the transformers to the board in order to avoid vibrations and magnet wire insulation damage
Transformers have no fixed current capability, 'I' may be as high as you want and the wire will just heat proportionally to 'I' squared, but heating is not the main concern here On these SMPS topologies, voltage drop on the output depends more on transformer leakage inductance than on magnet wire resistance. Adding an extra transformer halves leakage inductance so voltage drop is somewhat reduced |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Anonymityville
|
Conflicting arguments???????? Hhhhmmmm.......now I'm really confused. I probably don't have 1/100th of the knowledge any of you 3 posses, but my gut instinct tells me Eva is more or less(more than less?) correct. The 2 extra toroidal transformers I have are the exact same as the 2 on the board already. Assuming that if I added them everything is fine, is there any real benefits to doing this besides the ones Eva mentioned(or maybe someone can elaborate a little more on her thoughts for me). I also added 2 more 63v 4700uf caps to the rail supply if that matters any(there were 2 empty spots already on the board just begging for me to put them in
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: United states
|
I agree and disagree with EVA statement; it's correct in that there will be no difference on the high current drive side of the smps as long as saturation and leakage was not a design element, leakage would be greatly reduced and saturation nearly impossible with parallel roids requireing a much higher demand on the high current side if the output asks for it.
Without adding output devices, or a fan maybe, the output section would still need some attention or any higher output from the smps would just be wasted in the amps thermal protection shutting it off mid jam or even worse releasing the smoke. Quote:
I'm curious though, are you planning on the mod? If so, cuold you post your results and model info and maybe some pic's. Thanks |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DAC 1955 paralleled | fabiodord | Digital Source | 9 | 25th September 2008 10:20 PM |
| paralleled rectifiers for +/-v ? | snkby | Parts | 4 | 23rd May 2006 03:24 PM |
| 3 paralleled opa541's | odysseybmx414 | Chip Amps | 1 | 11th May 2005 01:37 PM |
| DAC with paralleled TDA1541's | sugano | Digital Source | 0 | 2nd May 2003 08:14 AM |
| Zen v4 with paralleled FETs | Stanislav | Pass Labs | 15 | 4th March 2003 10:48 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07766 seconds (86.75% PHP - 13.25% MySQL) with 10 queries |