Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Articles Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 20th July 2004, 03:01 AM   #11
fab is offline fab  
diyAudio Member
 
fab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Canada
Quote:
Originally posted by MikeB
...
But maybe there is a reason, why nearly noone uses CFP in the
diffamp ? (Except steven and some cyrus-amp)

Mike
hi Mike

At least Halcro, Lavardin and me use CFP in the input diff amp. I have also seen other amp circuits from what I remember. If it is not widely used it does not mean that it is not good. If it was so obvious to know what is the best topology in an audio amp then everybody would use the same basis.

Fab
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th July 2004, 07:53 AM   #12
diyAudio Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bandung
Default CCS and plain resistor

I read this somewhere here. Why is that for very low rail voltage (like +/-15V), a differential is better fed with CCS? While for higher rail (like +/-40V), it is ok to use CCS or plain resistor?

FAB,
How big is the CFP resistor can be (how low the current minimal in the first transistor)? Smaller than 50uA is OK?
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th July 2004, 02:00 PM   #13
MikeB is offline MikeB  
diyAudio Member
 
MikeB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gütersloh
Hi lumanauw, the reason is very simple: the two emitters of
the diffamp have a voltageswing of the middle of both inputs,
that means nearly exact the inputvoltage (plus some harmonics)
for a voltageswing of 0.7v at voltagerail 15v, this means that
the current fed into the diffamp differs about 4.6%.
The higher the voltagerail, the less this effect. At some voltage
the plain resistor can give a better constant current then a ccs.

I finished my amp this night, but this late in the night i was
not able to make extensive listeningtests. But i can say, that
i'm very impressed by the quality. The sound is crystalclear and
clean, and the instrumentseparation is a dream. Also it's like
you can see/feel the singer. (I tested with "brother in arms")
(hmm, i hate monolistening)
And no sign of any hard sound.

I used 2K for the CFP-Resistors, the CFP-BJTs are bc556b, the
input transistor are sk170. I skipped the currentmirror, to get
maximum bandwidth (-3db at ~1mhz )
Outputdevices are MJL1302A & co.
I already hear some noise, but only when pressing the ear directly
to the tweeter. It seems that i already have some thermal
problems in the diffampstage, the DC drifts ~60mv with a
frequency of ~30secs.
I still have to investigate this phenomen, maybe the diffamp is
not balanced enough. (2.2mA to 2.8 mA)
In spice i tested with upto 10k for the CFP-resistors, but the
difference in THD was minimal to the 2k.
Maybe i will downgrade to 1k, if the thermal drift keeps...
Or i reduce the current to the diffamp.
I have to recheck the datasheet for the sk170...

Mike
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st July 2004, 01:27 AM   #14
diyAudio Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bandung
Hi, Mike,
Thanks for the explenation.
Now back to the sch in post #1. The main idea of this sch is to advoid 2nd harmonic cancelation, so I dont use differential for input stage. But the VAS is forming differential. Will the harmonics be canceled here or not?
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st July 2004, 02:07 AM   #15
diyAudio Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bandung
Default Is this good or bad?

Quote:
the current fed into the diffamp differs about 4.6%.
The current fed to differential will varied if the rail voltage is low (like only +/-15V and using only plain resistor, not CCS). But is this good or bad (audibly and measurement)

This is kind of scary but we must know. Finding good sounding is not the same as finding good measurement.

Quote:
True story -- There's a guy named Andrew Hefley that is a very good solid state designer. Do a web search and you'll see he has a long and distinguished resume. You can even see some of his circuits in an app note he wrote for Motorola (now available at On Semiconductor).

About six or eight years ago, he heard his first single-ended triode. And do you know what he did? He quit the business. Now he makes instrumentation for light aircraft.

He told me that after 30 years of designing solid state audio amps that he figured he knew it pretty well. But after hearing the SET, it showed him that pretty much everything he knew and believed was wrong. Instead of going back to the drawing board, he literally quit the field.

There are other guys here, like Nelson, who didn't quit. Instead, they started exploring a completely different approach than "perfect steady-state performance on a test bench into a resistive load".

Thinking is good. Listening is better. Listening and thinking about what you are hearing is best.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st July 2004, 04:01 AM   #16
fab is offline fab  
diyAudio Member
 
fab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Canada
Default Re: CCS and plain resistor

Quote:
Originally posted by lumanauw
FAB,
How big is the CFP resistor can be (how low the current minimal in the first transistor)? Smaller than 50uA is OK?
hi lumanauw,

Unfortunately, I have not preformed a study on the optimal value for that resistor. I use 2k2 value. I think the resistor value depends also on the ratio of first input transistor collector current versus the second transistor collector current. Gerrard Perrot (Lavardin Technology) in his patent 5,635,874 suggests to use 1/4 of second bjt collector current in the first bjt collector current as an example and I believe that he may have performed a thourough analysis and testing to determine this ratio of collector current. I also think that if you use a too small current you may have an increase of noise depending on the input transistor noise characteristic.

Fab
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st July 2004, 04:27 AM   #17
thanh is offline thanh  
diyAudio Member
 
thanh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ho chi minh city
Send a message via Yahoo to thanh
Quote:
The odd harmonics are not phaseshifted
Ok! This is a reason which odd harmonics is increase by a factor of 2
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st July 2004, 04:32 AM   #18
thanh is offline thanh  
diyAudio Member
 
thanh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ho chi minh city
Send a message via Yahoo to thanh
Quote:
Finding good sounding is not the same as finding good measurement.
Ok! I re-say some word from a member of diyaudio
"Some one like music and some one like distortion"
I think "some one like HIFI and some one like distortion"
I hate odd harmonics too!
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st July 2004, 09:26 AM   #19
MikeB is offline MikeB  
diyAudio Member
 
MikeB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gütersloh
Hi lumanauw !

I did some checkings on VAS with Spice, it seems that the
VAS mainly creates 2nd harmonics, but i don't know if this
is still so if the transistors are matched. Cascoding the VAS
had a very big increase in qualitity.

I will check with the ccs to the diffamp this evening, but from
my imagination, using a resistor with low voltagerails should
create 2nd harmonics. (but maybe only with asymetrical topology)

BTW, i did some extensive listeningtests with my CFP-testamp,
and i must say: Wow, CFP rulez ! is it really patented ?
Of course it's still preferable to find a topology for ClassAB that
cancels out odd harmonics.

Mike
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st July 2004, 10:13 AM   #20
MikeB is offline MikeB  
diyAudio Member
 
MikeB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gütersloh
Quote:
Originally posted by thanh

Ok! I re-say some word from a member of diyaudio
"Some one like music and some one like distortion"
I think "some one like HIFI and some one like distortion"
I hate odd harmonics too!
Yes, odd harmonics are agony... and the human ear is extremely
sensitive to them. I experimented a little, add 3% 3rd harmonic
to music (done with software), and you instantly puke, add 3%
2nd harmonic, and you wonder if there really is a difference !
(Okay, played only through pcspeakers) But this means that
simple THD-measurements are useless to describe the soundquality
of an amp. (Not a new discovery at all...)
I still don't know what i prefer, HIFI (ultraprecise reproduction),
or some nice harmonics... I am still on the quest to a ultraprecise
ClassAB. (Maybe found it last night) I think i "simply" need to
construct a single ended ClassA, not showing any odd harmonics.
(And then compare them)
Mike
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Work Wpp2400 Power Amplifier SMARTCAT Class D 12 10th November 2008 04:59 PM
Im BAAAACK! Marathon amplifier question, won't work bridged mono! 240z4u Car Audio 11 3rd April 2008 02:56 AM
What Speakers Work best with the JLH 10W Class A Amplifier John Biles Solid State 9 8th August 2005 12:53 PM
Audio Work Bench Mark A. Gulbrandsen Everything Else 7 9th March 2004 03:47 AM
Is this analyzer good for audio work ? Bernhard Parts 0 6th December 2003 06:02 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:42 AM.

Page generated in 0.11408496 seconds (84.11% PHP - 15.89% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2010 diyAudio