Current feedback - Voltage feedback, how do I see the difference? - Page 71 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30th March 2013, 09:26 PM   #701
Waly is offline Waly  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Waly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: London
Quote:
Originally Posted by michaelkiwanuka View Post
We need to be clear what "HF" means: from my perspective it's not hard to build a VFA with relatively high loop gain at the top end of the audio band, siginicantly higher than that provided by a so-called "CFA" for comparable stability margins. Just use double pole compensation..
Take your own example: 60dB loop gain at 60KHz. This makes (for a single pole) a ULGF of 60MHz. That wouldn't be possible anywhere close for a power amp.

In a VFA, given a single pole non-compensated ULGF the only way to increase the loop gain at (say) 60KHz is to insert N poles and then N-1 zeroes to bring the phase back to the Bode stability condition. The larger N, the steeper the rolloff of the loop gain, but anything with N>3 is a practical nonsense, at least because of implementation and thermal stability issues. The only realistic example with N=3 I have ever seen is the Cherry NDFL topology.

Now show me a N=2 topology (TPC, TMC, whatever you fancy) with 60dB of loop gain at 60KHz and an ULGF of (an optimistic) 3-4MHz and I'll be fully in your VFA boat . Or with N>=3 which is also unconditional stable.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2013, 09:52 PM   #702
dadod is offline dadod  Croatia
diyAudio Member
 
dadod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Zagreb
Quote:
Originally Posted by michaelkiwanuka View Post
Clearly double pole compensation or even "TMC" cannot be used in the usual so-called "CFA" topology.
Why not, look here. What about this amp-CFA or VFA?
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2013, 09:59 PM   #703
Waly is offline Waly  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Waly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: London
Quote:
Originally Posted by dadod View Post
Because of the x20 feedback resistor (R5/R6) over the emitter resistors (R36/R40), this is barely a real "CFA", but more like "a CFA topology in VFA mode" as described above. 1kohm barely loads the input node and therefore modifies the forward gain (through the transconductance of the input stage).
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2013, 10:00 PM   #704
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chigwell, Essex
Quote:
Originally Posted by dadod View Post
Why not....
Because minor loop compensation of the shunt derived shunt applied variety can only be implemented around an inverting gain block (transimpedance stage). Nothing of the kind is to be found in the usual so-called "CFA".
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2013, 10:02 PM   #705
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chigwell, Essex
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waly View Post
Take your own example: 60dB loop gain at 60KHz.
I think you mean 60dB at 20KHz....But that was just an approximation.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2013, 10:09 PM   #706
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chigwell, Essex
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waly View Post
No. IMMV, but to me the difference is like the small signal slew rate (aka "speed") vs. the large signal slew rate (aka "slew rate"). The former is a measure of the bandwidth, the latter is a measure of a non-linear input stage limiting effect.
There is no such thing as "small signal slew". There is only one definition for slew rate and power bandwidth, and it can be found in any good analog electronics textbook.

I suspect, however, that what you're alluding to is the distortion arising from the increased loading of the minor loop compensation network with increasing frequency on the transadmittance stage (the LTP) in a VFA. Some have called this "slewing induced distortion", but this is not a very descriptive term in my view-it will have to do, nevertheless.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2013, 10:13 PM   #707
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chigwell, Essex
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waly View Post
BTW, I suppose you are aware you can use a VFA in "CFA mode"? See for example the Alexander amp.
I know the Alexander amp, which is really a voltage feedback amp. in all respects.

But, perhaps, I do not understand what you mean by "...you can use a VFA in "CFA mode"?
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2013, 10:15 PM   #708
Waly is offline Waly  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Waly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: London
Quote:
Originally Posted by michaelkiwanuka View Post
I think you mean 60dB at 20KHz....But that was just an approximation.
Ok, say 60dB @ 20KHz or 50dB @ 60KHz, is still a 20MHz ULGF, unattainable for a power VFA... 6dB extra loop gain for a two pole compensation, still to high for a power VFA.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2013, 10:17 PM   #709
Waly is offline Waly  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Waly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: London
Quote:
Originally Posted by michaelkiwanuka View Post
I know the Alexander amp, which is really a voltage feedback amp. in all respects.
Here we go again . Not gonna bite the bait this time, good night .
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2013, 10:32 PM   #710
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chigwell, Essex
Good night me old mate!
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:50 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2