Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10th June 2004, 04:39 AM   #11
azira is offline azira  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Near Seattle
Quote:
Originally posted by djk

"* There's a lot of oppinions about thermal runaway with MOSFETS. I don't understand a lot of it but if you're planning on your Vgs multiplier following your output devices then you might consider swapping the BJT for a small FET instead. It'll should work the same but will have more similar thermal tracking. On the otherhand you might not need to track your output devices at all."

I always wonder why people make remarks like this. Pull the data sheet and look. Then there is less chance you will make an inappropriate remark. By accident you almost made a good remark, but it shouldn't be a small FET, it should be of the same type the outputs are.
Hmm... after having posted the logic behind my suggesting a FET, what makes it such an "accident"? Not everyone on here agrees what "thermal runaway" is or if MOSFETs suffer from it...

What I am saying is straight forward:

IF you are of the classification that believes FETs suffer from thermal runaway then a FET Vgs multiplier might be better than a BJT one.
On the other hand, iF you are NOT of that classification, then it doesn't matter what you use...

Really, how many BJT amplifiers do you see use the same device for the output device AND Vbe multiplier?

Not the Citation 12, Not the Leach amp, Not P3A
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th June 2004, 07:50 AM   #12
djk is offline djk
diyAudio Member
 
djk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA
You still don't get it do you?

"IF you are of the classification that believes FETs suffer from thermal runaway then a FET Vgs multiplier might be better than a BJT one.
On the other hand, iF you are NOT of that classification, then it doesn't matter what you use..."

Whether it needs it or not is not determined by anyones' opinion, but by the construction of the part.

The manufacturers data sheet will show the tempco of the RDS and the Vgs.

"Really, how many BJT amplifiers do you see use the same device for the output device AND Vbe multiplier?"

If you use the same part then the Vgs tempco will be the same, what does a TO220 FETcost? Maybe $0.50?

On CFP amplifiers I always use the same exact transistor I use as the driver, diode connected and in contact with the driver.

Look at a Mark Levinson ML3 schematic, that's where I got the idea from.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th June 2004, 03:50 PM   #13
azira is offline azira  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Near Seattle
Quote:
Originally posted by djk
You still don't get it do you?
...
Whether it needs it or not is not determined by anyones' opinion, but by the construction of the part.

The manufacturers data sheet will show the tempco of the RDS and the Vgs.

Yes, I do. You are one that doesn't believe MOSFETS can have thermal runaway. Or atleast what you interpret thermal runway
to be.

If that was the case, why bother putting a heatsink on it?

Here's a link that states that power MOSFETS can thermally runaway.

http://www.smpstech.com/tmos0000.htm

Here's a link to a thread I had a while ago in which the participants couldn't agree what thermal runaway WAS.

Will a true class B have thermal runaway?
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2004, 09:02 AM   #14
djk is offline djk
diyAudio Member
 
djk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA
At the risk of repeating myself:

"Lateral MOS types are the only easy ones to use in a class AB amplifier, they are easy to spot because the Source is connected to the case. Vertical MOS are easiest to use in class A designs, the Drain is connected to the case."

That should make it simple for those who can't find or read the data sheet.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2004, 11:33 AM   #15
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Athens
Default MANY THANKS

Dear all

Your replys were a great help for me.
thank you all for you comments and for your help.
I will let you know for the results of my amp as soon as possible.

Regards

George Vasiliou
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2004, 01:20 PM   #16
ekaerin is offline ekaerin  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
ekaerin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Stockholm
Default Azira

Yo are right about this. Contrary to public believe FETs run away.
I have experienced this many times at work when we constantly monitor
the losses in different transistors during evaluation.
The mechanism, however, is different from BJTs but the bottom line are
always exploding transistors.

This almost deserve a new thread I think.

/ Regards / Mattias
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
6S19P Push-Pull Amplifier sorenj07 Tubes / Valves 6 24th October 2007 02:59 AM
6BQ5 Push-Pull amplifier YFW Tubes / Valves 6 7th June 2007 10:18 PM
modify parallel push-pull EL84 to single push-pull chungtat Tubes / Valves 12 3rd November 2005 11:25 PM
Double push-pull versus single push-pull jraraujo Tubes / Valves 19 19th October 2002 12:23 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:47 PM.

Page generated in 0.09011 seconds (79.34% PHP - 20.66% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio