|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Italy
|
I noticed a great difference in the BF value of their models, with one = 191 and the other = 505.
From the datasheet they should be very similar;It seems another OnSemi error |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
|
so what should we use?
191 or 505
__________________
lineup |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Others have commented that ONsemi's models are inaccurate.
Might be best to try and find better models. have a look at this thread for ideas/info. http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...67#post1256867
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
|
here is link to on-semi models for
MJL4281A and MJL4302A http://www.onsemi.com/PowerSolutions...s&rpn=MJL4281A http://www.onsemi.com/PowerSolutions...s&rpn=MJL4302A
__________________
lineup |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
|
Quote:
And if I owned a such big company, I would not tolerate to have bad models online if there were people complaining .. anywhere at www A few more bad models, my friend, and you are FIRED from working at On.Semi
__________________
lineup |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Quote:
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
|
Quote:
Can BF be as different as 191 to 505 for two NPN, PNP in the same class? MJL4281A NPN has BF=191 MJL4302A PNP has BF=505 Both models were done August 2003
__________________
lineup |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2003
|
For an ideal BJT whose beta does not vary with current, BF is the same as beta. When beta varies with current, things get a bit messier. See Figure 9 on this page. That shows a plot of ln(Ib) and ln(Ic) vs. Vbe. Decreasing beta at low collector currents comes from the Ib characteristic deviating from the ideal exponential at low currents. Decreasing beta at high currents comes from the Ic characteristic deviating from the ideal exponential at high currents. If the high current and low current regions do not overlap at all, then beta will be constant at mid-current values and BF will correspond to the value of beta in this region. However, for a lot of devices there is quite a bit of overlap between the region where Ib is non-ideal (low currents) and where Ic is non-ideal (high currents). For such a device, BF can be much larger than the actual maximum value of beta.
The actual formulas that SPICE uses for all this are shown starting with equation (1) in the link above. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2003
|
Yeah, the problem is that the datasheets don't usually have the needed plots of Ib and Ic vs. Vbe using a log current scale. If those were available, one could find the regions where ln(Ic) and ln(Ib) fit the ideal behavior. By extrapolating each of these lines, BF could be found by noting that the vertical displacement between the two is ln(BF). Without those, it becomes a guessing game. For the MJL1302A, one would certainly expect BF to match the value of beta in the region where it's constant. But for the MJL3281A, beta increases with increasing current up to pretty large Ic. One needs to have telepathic powers to really know what's happening here without the needed data.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Trade MJL4302/MJL4281 for - | sklimek | Swap Meet | 7 | 14th November 2006 03:48 AM |
| help with models. | bogdan_borko | Solid State | 7 | 11th November 2006 02:19 PM |
| mje models? | bogdan_borko | Solid State | 2 | 29th May 2006 11:37 PM |
| Mjl4281/mjl4302 | defranne | Parts | 3 | 4th October 2004 10:41 AM |
| MJL4281-4302 Matching | Chrisv1983 | Solid State | 6 | 6th March 2004 07:45 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11031 seconds (80.72% PHP - 19.28% MySQL) with 11 queries |