|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Recife - Brasil Northeast
|
I had an idea, but i cannot develop.
In Radio frequency transmissions whe have the old and well knowed Single Side Band.... or, a transmittion made with a carrier supressed.... is amplitude modulated yes, but carrier rises when audio from microfone rises...when you do not talk, carrier is entirelly supressed (diodes does) and nothing is transmitted... transmitter only warms because bias in class AB, sometime bias is a little bit increased when stand by mode. If we do that in audio, bias controled by audio level, more audio, more bias, less audio, less bias.... whe will avoid creation of heaters.... can also modulate in ultra sonic frequencies filtered in output or just control the bias proportional to level of audio in input connector of audio amplifier. A bias modulated amplifier! I see some Engeenius Enginneers here (not joke, enginneers with some special brain), can you, as examples, Chocoholic, Eva, Hugh AKSA, Mr Dupont, Rodd Elliot, and the whole others, forgive me to forget, for a while, his names.... can you create this?.... and please let me know how. I want a class A amplifiers, no doubts is the better we can have... can you help me, helping all of us, giving one manking step into a better and not heatted future. Carlos
__________________
Try to build an amplifier folks ... it is pure adrenaline! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Krell has done something like that, I think they called it "Sustained Plateau Bias".
Search on the web, there should be somehing there. Jan Didden
__________________
/Another new issue: Linear Audio Volume 3! |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Munich
|
Hi Carlos!
What did I do that you count me in the row the ingenious engineers of this forum?? ![]() This winter I came back to my audio passion and I am slowly learning about some points which I missed in audio topics during the last years! Well, regarding your question. I would expect that any underbiased diode in the signal path of an audio amp would cause undesirable distorsions. But I am curiously looking forward to the comments of some RF-experienced guys here. May be they have some ideas to use one or the other RF-technology-principle for audio amps. Cheers Markus |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
And Mark Levinson has their own solution. One of them has
published some info about how it works, but I don't remember which of them it was. I think it has been posted on the forum already. Try searching for "adaptive bias" or "sustained plateu bias" or whatever Krell called it. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Munich
|
...had a look to Krell....
Well, I didn't find much technical information except that "Sustained Plateau Bias" is great..... Adaptive bias sounds interesting. I was thinking of this several times. But up to now all my ideas for a simple implementation caused more distorsions than I could accept. Well, these distorsions weren't cross over distorsions any more. But I didn't feel lucky to buy in new distorsions just in order to get rid of the cross over distorsions.... And I stopped all my approaches already in the theoretical stage. Thanks for the hint. I will search for adaptive bias in the forum. Cheers Markus |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Canada
|
My personal impression is that modulating the DC bias for output in function of input signal level is increasing the difficulty level to obtain an HI-FI amp. This goes reversely with the goal to "stabilize" the output DC bias regardsless of output ausio level (a lot of patent on that).
If you want to have a most efficient (less heat for high power) AMP - sacrifying the Hi-Fi - you have the class D. At first class D was limited to PA but I know that more recently it has improved a lot to get close to Hi-Fi. Regards, Spock |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Colorado
|
I'm surprised at the misinformation in this thread.
Krell's variable bias scheme senses the level of the input signal and raises the bias when the signal is larger. The bias remains high for a few seconds after the signal decreases, hence the "sustained" part of the name. Levinson's "adaptive bias" scheme, in contrast, varies the bias instananeously with the signal amplitude. Their circuit was taken directly from an AES paper by Sansui in the early '80s, which in turn is a modified version of Nelson Pass's patent from the mid-'70s. Neither of these amps operates anything at all like the original poster's question. There is one amp that is somewhat similar -- the latest Berning design. It uses tubes with an RF modulation scheme. I can't remember what it's called -- something about "zero" and "hysteresis", I think. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Recife - Brasil Northeast
|
And please, receive my thanks you all:
Jan Didden, i will find "sustained plateau bias" Markus, i have been reading your comments on forum, if not an explendid enginner, comparing my week know how you are PHD! FAB. you really made me think that maybe this method will really modulate audio, increasing and decreasing bias will move a lot, dynamics will change to, maybe tracking with errors. I will see Levingsons and Mr Pass already told me to read his entire site. Christer, welcome back and thanks, you confirmed the way to follow Hansen, thank you. Your surprise made me understand, that i have to put on more in the list of the best 50 top Enginneers. I am also surprised when my daugther can not make some calculations, and also when she is not well informed related a lot of things, thats the difference when we look up side down. Thank your attention, i will find. Best regards to all of you....Hey Choco, lets have an ice cream? Carlos
__________________
Try to build an amplifier folks ... it is pure adrenaline! |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Colorado
|
Jan and Christer -
Please accept my apologies. I misread the original post, as Carlos was apparently asking for both an RF-modulated bias scheme or a bias modulated by the audio signal itself. Your answers were in line; mine wasn't. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Colorado
|
Carlos -
Here is the link to the Berning amplifier: http://www.davidberning.com/zh270.htm After re-reading his description I don't think it's of much use to your quest, except possibly as a point of inspiration. You may be better off to try the Krell or Sansui (Levinson) approach as suggested by Jan and Christer. The Krell approach requires that the bias be increased *before* the large signal reaches the output stage. My understanding is that he employs very fast circuit that monitors the input stage signal level. Then this control signal changes the bias before the audio signal reaches the output stage. The Sansui (Levinson) approach is a kind of positive feedback scheme. I did some simulations with it and was underwhelmed, but you may achieve different results. The Sansui AES paper has all of the details. You can see the schematics at: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...958#post345958 |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.31434 seconds (92.30% PHP - 7.70% MySQL) with 9 queries |