|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jakarta
|
Quote:
So if you get 4 resistors that ALL fall at exactly +10% that is probably okay, especially if the 4 are used to divide the current in the differential stage. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
the HP34401A sells for around $500 on EBay. the HP3478A and HP3468A will sell anywhere from $70 to $200. Of these the 3478A has an additional digit. the advantage of the 3468A is that it connects to the HP-IL loop in case you want to connect it to a HP Calculator. The 3478A is also a very good RMS meter -- while it uses the AD536 chip for true RMS it is almost as acurate as my thermal RMS reading meter. The bottom meter shown below should be reading current -- I was using it to match some transistors yesterday: |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Left Coast
|
The tolerance required in a particular amp (or other device) can span the range from very critical to surprisingly uncritical. Sometimes it is the ratio between two resistors rather than the absolute value that matters. Where you hace an RC network and are using caps with a 20% tolerance, it seems dubious that either 1% or even 5% resistors are critical.
On the other hand, in differential inputs and current mirrors (though I don't think the Leach uses CMs), matching better than 1% can be useful. I think Self mentioned that even 1% de3generation resistors could have a difference of up to 2% which was enough to degrade performance. All that said, I have on occasion, deliberately use only 5% resistors and selected transistors for CMs and differential pairs without any attempt at matching, just to see what one could get away with. The results were a functional amp. It probably just didn't perform quite as well as one might like. I say probably, because you probably couldn't hear anything wrong unless you did a very well controlled bind listening comparrisson. Despite this, I suggest you follow the advice for the Leach and even match some resistors closer if possible. It might be more sensative to exact values somewhere and you will feel better afterwards. This last is not intended to be silly, for amps I intend to listen to and not just expiriment with, I use all 1% resistors, match CM and differential pairs, and even try to sort caps to a better tolerance than claimed. Then, at least I know that there is now issue with component tlerance. Besides it feels good - like driving on Pirelli's even if you are only going to buy groceries! |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NTE Metal Film Resistors? | Sherman | Tubes / Valves | 9 | 27th June 2011 07:05 PM |
| WTB: 1% metal film resistors | jrsun | Swap Meet | 7 | 5th June 2006 11:19 PM |
| 1% metal film resistors - overkill? | LowRedMoon | Parts | 26 | 17th April 2006 12:11 AM |
| Carbon film vs metal film resistors in a stepped attenuator? | G | Tubes / Valves | 17 | 22nd August 2004 12:22 AM |
| Metal film resistors or carbon film in a tube amp? | G | Tubes / Valves | 220 | 31st March 2003 01:57 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |