Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 13th April 2004, 10:57 PM   #1
MikeB is offline MikeB  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
MikeB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gütersloh
Question Should i try this ?

Hi !

I just designed a new ClassAB-Amp, but maybe it's a little
strange...
What do you think, should i give this a try ?
The THD in PSpice says 0.0005% @ 2.8v 4ohm 1khz

Its specially the inputcircuit that i haven't seen yet,
maybe i violate some semiconductor-rules ?

cu,
Michael
Attached Images
File Type: gif strange_ckt.gif (11.3 KB, 530 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th April 2004, 05:40 AM   #2
sajti is offline sajti  Hungary
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vác, Hungary
Hi,

there is nothing strange in Your amplifier. There are some unusual solution, such as Q29, and the 666ohms in the VAS stage.
But I think it will work, If You put together.

sajti
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th April 2004, 07:03 AM   #3
DarkOne is offline DarkOne  Slovakia
diyAudio Member
 
DarkOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bratislava
Looks good, but why did you use current source against Q29?
You should use emmiter follower with Q30(as Q29) and place temperature compensation and bias circuit between colectors of Q31 and Q32. I think that it can be much better.
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th April 2004, 07:49 AM   #4
MikeB is offline MikeB  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
MikeB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gütersloh
Quote:
Originally posted by DarkOne
Looks good, but why did you use current source against Q29?
You should use emmiter follower with Q30(as Q29) and place temperature compensation and bias circuit between colectors of Q31 and Q32. I think that it can be much better.

I thought, do it a different way... ;-)
In fact, the construction with the current source against Q29
showed up much better results. Q29/Q30 form a simple current
gain. Because of the constant current through the emitter of Q29
this transistor has much better linearity and has nearly a constant
current at its base, which reduces distortions in the VAS.
Especially the high harmonics above K3 seem to be eliminated.

The strange part in this circuit (i thought) is the inputmodel, using
complementary jfets.

Mike
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th April 2004, 08:39 AM   #5
Tony is offline Tony  Philippines
diyAudio Member
 
Tony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Palatiw, Pasig City
Send a message via Yahoo to Tony Send a message via Skype™ to Tony
q29/q30 forms a buffer circuit between the vas and output stage right?
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th April 2004, 09:30 AM   #6
MikeB is offline MikeB  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
MikeB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gütersloh
Quote:
Originally posted by joan2
q29/q30 forms a buffer circuit between the vas and output stage right?

Yes, i wanted to avoid a tripledarlington, and this kind of buffer
seems to be very friendly to the VAS.
The 2nd advantage is, that it doesnt use complementary BJTs...
So no matching of devices here :-)

Mike
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th April 2004, 10:37 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
traderbam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
why is R31 a difference value from R32?
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th April 2004, 10:52 AM   #8
MikeB is offline MikeB  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
MikeB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gütersloh
Quote:
Originally posted by traderbam
why is R31 a difference value from R32?

It's not easy to match transistors in PSpice, so i compensated
with these differences. In real world, this would be a poti for
adjusting DC-Offset. With perfectly matched pairs, these two
would be identical.
I will try to match these in PSpice, this should greatly reduce K2,
i hope...
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th April 2004, 12:21 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
traderbam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
Good way to adjust dc offset. However, a side-effect is to change the feedback factor between the two halves, which may or may not be what you want.
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th April 2004, 12:27 PM   #10
MikeB is offline MikeB  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
MikeB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gütersloh
No, i don't really want that, i think that this difference creates
many K2's, that's why the transistors should be matched.
But a minimal difference shouldn't do any harm.
I just ordered the jfet's (spuro.de), i will try this amp the next
days...
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:31 AM.

Page generated in 0.09538 seconds (77.67% PHP - 22.33% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio