|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gütersloh
|
Hi !
I just designed a new ClassAB-Amp, but maybe it's a little strange... What do you think, should i give this a try ? The THD in PSpice says 0.0005% @ 2.8v 4ohm 1khz Its specially the inputcircuit that i haven't seen yet, maybe i violate some semiconductor-rules ? cu, Michael |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vác, Hungary
|
Hi,
there is nothing strange in Your amplifier. There are some unusual solution, such as Q29, and the 666ohms in the VAS stage. But I think it will work, If You put together. sajti |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bratislava
|
Looks good, but why did you use current source against Q29?
You should use emmiter follower with Q30(as Q29) and place temperature compensation and bias circuit between colectors of Q31 and Q32. I think that it can be much better. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gütersloh
|
Quote:
I thought, do it a different way... ;-) In fact, the construction with the current source against Q29 showed up much better results. Q29/Q30 form a simple current gain. Because of the constant current through the emitter of Q29 this transistor has much better linearity and has nearly a constant current at its base, which reduces distortions in the VAS. Especially the high harmonics above K3 seem to be eliminated. The strange part in this circuit (i thought) is the inputmodel, using complementary jfets. Mike |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
q29/q30 forms a buffer circuit between the vas and output stage right?
__________________
http://www.electronicslab.ph/forum/i...?topic=32688.0 |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gütersloh
|
Quote:
Yes, i wanted to avoid a tripledarlington, and this kind of buffer seems to be very friendly to the VAS. The 2nd advantage is, that it doesnt use complementary BJTs... So no matching of devices here :-) Mike |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
|
why is R31 a difference value from R32?
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gütersloh
|
Quote:
It's not easy to match transistors in PSpice, so i compensated with these differences. In real world, this would be a poti for adjusting DC-Offset. With perfectly matched pairs, these two would be identical. I will try to match these in PSpice, this should greatly reduce K2, i hope... |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
|
Good way to adjust dc offset. However, a side-effect is to change the feedback factor between the two halves, which may or may not be what you want.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gütersloh
|
No, i don't really want that, i think that this difference creates
many K2's, that's why the transistors should be matched. But a minimal difference shouldn't do any harm. I just ordered the jfet's (spuro.de), i will try this amp the next days... |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09538 seconds (77.67% PHP - 22.33% MySQL) with 10 queries |