|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Singapore
|
Hi everyone,
I have finished contructing a 50W amplifier based on the Hitachi 2SK1058 and 2SK162 L-MOSFET. I need to adjust the quiescent current. What is the optimium setting that results in low distortion as well as reasonable power dissipation. Thanks for your feedback. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silicon Valley
|
The simple answer is just set it for 100ma per device.
The bias current is not critical, between 100ma and 200ma per deivice will work OK for class AB operation. Lower runs cooler, which I prefer. Borbely recommends about 150ma for Hitachi lateral MOSFETs, while Pass recommends about 100 ma for IR vertical MOSFETs The optimal way to set this might be the slick method detailed in the Nelson Pass article on the Citation MF12, where you set it based on minimizing crossover distortion using only a scope, oscillator and power resistor. http://www.passdiy.com/pdf/citation.pdf Even though that MF12 implementation used vertical MOSFETs, and you are using laterals, the procedure is identical. The bias voltage will of course be quite different, perhaps 1 volt versus about 7-8 volts for the vertical MOSFETs. Both result in the same bias current and minimal distortion. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Colorado
|
Here's a little more information:
1) 100 mA per device is a good starting point. Below that and you be in the area of a positive tempco, which isn't ideal. 2) There won't really be an optimum value that will minimize crossover distortion. There is an optimum bias for bipolars (besides full-on class-A), but not FETs. 3) Performance (sonic and measured) with FETs will basically increase without limit as the bias is increased. Unfortunately, so does the heat. I would start at 100 mA, and go up from there. If you can rest your hand on the heatsink for a few seconds before it becomes uncomfortably hot, that is around 125 F. I wouldn't go much hotter than that or else you will risk danger of burns and also shortened component life. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Singapore
|
However in one of Slone's books he does explicityly say that he thinks the optimal bias current for these devices is 40mA. There is no explanation given though.
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Colorado
|
Here's one explanation -- some people like the sound of high-order harmonic distortion. Or to be a little gentler about it, they consider a warm amplifier to be more of a problem than high-order harmonic distortion.
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Left Coast
|
"However in one of Slone's books he does explicityly say that he thinks the optimal bias current for these devices is 40mA. There is no explanation given though."
He changed his figures between books. In the earlier one he wrote 50mA between the source and output rail per device. Is the 100mA figure quoted here for each device or is it for each pair? In a later book he uses the figure of 40mA to multiply by the sum of both of the source resistors to get a voltage figure, voltages being a little more convenient to measure. Having built only bipolar amps so far, but contemplating a MOSFET effort entually, I'm curious to know if this is just a question of how the figure is stated or if there is actually a 2:1 difference in recomended bias measurement. |
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Colorado
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Prague, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka
|
In case that you want to prevent the effect of Gm decrease (higher order harmonics as said) then bias them at least at 100mA, I would say 200 mA.
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Koskenkorva Land
|
PMA,
I'm not sure I understand the rellationship between Gm and high order harmonics, could you (or anybody else) elaborate on this? Thanks, Michael
__________________
"If transistors are blueberries and FETs are strawberries, then tubes must be.. pears" Michael 29th January 2010 |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2SJ162-E and 2SK1058-E | 1965GTO | Vendor's Bazaar | 5 | 7th August 2012 06:05 PM |
| Anyone know where to get 2SJ162/2SK1058 | fossil2k | Solid State | 8 | 17th March 2008 12:07 PM |
| 2sk1058/2sj162 Fs | sandyhooker | Swap Meet | 3 | 12th March 2008 04:50 PM |
| Cheap Source for 2SK1058 / 2SJ162 Hitachi L-Mosfets | Killjoy99 | Parts | 6 | 4th February 2005 10:50 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.34650 seconds (100.00% PHP - 0% MySQL) with 9 queries |