|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Perth, Australia.
|
In 25 years servicing all types of audio gear, I have seen quite a few different pcb materials.
For example, most consumer audio uses brown phenolic paper pcb, Pioneer uses a white substrate (polyester ?), Yamaha uses a non fiberglass pcb that looks a bit like fiberglass, and of course fiberglass substrate. I understand the economics reasons for hole punching versus hole drilling. The question is has anybody built identical power amp modules using different substrate materials and found a sonic difference or preference ? Same question for DAC stages ? Thanks, Eric. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Scandinavia
|
I must confess that I must answer NO to your question on having built identical stuff on different substrates.
However, if you are going to stray from the regular materials, move to Teflon straight away since Teflon is dielectrically the best solid material known to man. If you have special needs (RF), you might want to go for a high K teflon composite to "electrically lengthen" your traces. Petter |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Perth, Australia.
|
Thanks Petter for your reply.
I plan to build multiple power amp modules for active cabinets, so cost of Teflon pcb is probably too high. I'm mainly after a comparo of more standard materials. Eric. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Norway, -north of the moral circle..
|
Having built electronic systems for many years, using all sorts of PCB materials, I wonder if the price for Teflon boards really justifies the effort, except for RF and strip line work where it is well worth the effort.
Teflon boards are a lot more difficult to work with, and except for Teflon composites not mechanically very good i my opinion. I know some very high priced brands use these PCBs, but is using Teflon PCB really worth the price and effort, in sonic terms, or is it just PPM chasing, or even worse, plain hogwash ?? Any solid evidence, or plausible reports ?? |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FR-3 , FR-4 pcb materials | Zen Mod | Parts | 7 | 15th June 2011 12:48 PM |
| Sub Box Materials | BigDave9387 | Subwoofers | 6 | 13th October 2005 10:32 AM |
| Materials | Madmike2 | Subwoofers | 14 | 20th August 2005 03:19 AM |
| Enclosure materials. | rakeshln | Multi-Way | 0 | 10th June 2004 03:41 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07612 seconds (74.20% PHP - 25.80% MySQL) with 10 queries |