GainWire Mk3 CFA pre/phone amp with very low distortion

Here are the schematics (GainWire mk3 and Shunt Regulator +-15V) and the BOM.
When I receive the boards I prefer to assemble one bord and test it(it will take one week about) check for errors(I see some in silk screen now, but not functional) and then send to ones who ordered it, if you agree.
Damir

edit: be aware that the board contains two GainWire mk3 and two corresponding Shunt Regulators.
 

Attachments

  • GainWire-mk3-GNFB-CFA-sch-2.jpg
    GainWire-mk3-GNFB-CFA-sch-2.jpg
    267.8 KB · Views: 721
  • Shunt Regulator +-15V.jpg
    Shunt Regulator +-15V.jpg
    185.9 KB · Views: 725
  • GainWire mk3-GNFB-CFA-BOM.txt
    2.5 KB · Views: 147
Last edited:
Damir,why you are choosing this demon transistor that is out of production?

It is not easy to find replacement, and by the way LSK170 is in production but expensive. This jfet is very low noise but for this circuit it's no so important.
Maybe it could be used J112 or BF256B instead. For BF256 I can't find low voltage region Id Dds plot, and J112 looks quite OK.
Voltage drop on that CCS(J1 - 2SK170) is about 2.7 V and some jfet will not behaved as good CCS at so low voltage.
 
There is always a way, but I don't see how to do that without increasing distortion to much or make it to complicate. I have to think more about it.

OK, I did some simulation and my answer is no.

First what came to my mind is to use GainWire in inverting mode, I can connect two inputs +input and -input of two channels in parallel and the output will be balanced. To do that I need to use -input, but as this is CFA -input is low impedance so it needs some kind of buffer. That works but distortion increased 100 times(actually from 0.06 ppm to 5 ppm).
But there is another main reason why it would not work properly.
The gain in non inverting mode is calculated Rf/Rg +1 and in inverting mode Rg/Rf, that is inverting mode gain is non inverting gain-1. This is no problem for a power amp where a gain is set high in most cases around 28 times (it's important to know that balanced means balanced impedances and less symmetrical voltages) and difference is insignificant, but for preamplifiers a gain is low(in this case 3.6 times) and difference(non inverting - inverting gain) is not acceptable.

Adding external inverter buffer is other option but that is not GainWire any more.
Damir
 
It is not easy to find replacement, and by the way LSK170 is in production but expensive. This jfet is very low noise but for this circuit it's no so important.
Maybe it could be used J112 or BF256B instead. For BF256 I can't find low voltage region Id Dds plot, and J112 looks quite OK.
Voltage drop on that CCS(J1 - 2SK170) is about 2.7 V and some jfet will not behaved as good CCS at so low voltage.

Hi Damir,

regarding the substitution of the FETs i have following question.
is the J112 als sufficient to replace the 2N5486/85 or what else do you suggest? BF244 BF245 or J112. What are the key parameters for this FET?
Any proposal for the rectifier diodes, since you wrote in thee BOM only 1A

BR
Günni
 
Hi Damir,

regarding the substitution of the FETs i have following question.
is the J112 als sufficient to replace the 2N5486/85 or what else do you suggest? BF244 BF245 or J112. What are the key parameters for this FET?
Any proposal for the rectifier diodes, since you wrote in thee BOM only 1A

BR
Günni

Hi Gunni,
For those CCSs(J2 and J3) Idss should be around 10 to 15 mA and set to 8 - 10 mA. BF244B could be used, but no J112.
I left undefined the rectifier diodes, just 1 A. It could be used different types, normal, fast soft recovery, it is not critical. I use 1N4937.
BR Damir