Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23rd February 2004, 03:20 PM   #11
eLarson is offline eLarson  United States
diyAudio Member
 
eLarson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Default Re-arrangement of an LTP

Quote:
Originally posted by sreten
I'm certainly no expert on circuit topologies but NP's comments
confirmed my dimmed with time observation (which I wasn't
now sure about) that a folded cascode is effectively a re-
arrangement of an LTP pair.
With respect to a re-arranged LTP, were you thinking of an emitter-follower/common-base cascade? That would result when driving one half of the LTP (only) and taking the output from the opposite side.

You'd avoid the Miller capacitance-multiplying effect in a similar way to a cascode, too.

Erik
__________________
Would a woodchuck bother to chuck MDF?
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd February 2004, 07:11 PM   #12
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: flyover country
This isn't directly on subject, but what do people think of the vacuum tube LTP differential crosscoupled cascode amplifier?
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th February 2004, 03:34 AM   #13
diyAudio Member
 
wrenchone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silicon Valley
Please don't hijack my thread. It is so easy to start a new thread in the vacuum state section - you might even get some replies...
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th February 2004, 03:45 AM   #14
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bandung
Quote:
FYI, here's an older thread, dealing with the sound of cascode:http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/show...3398&highlight=
That is a very good thread, but unfortunately it stops without any answer to the original question. The guru's are debating about the definition of cascodes instead. I wonder what will be the conclusion of that thread if it was continued to finish.

After reading that old thread, it shakes my believe again. First, I learn that distortion comes from fluctuating voltage and fluctuating current.

The fluctuating current is remedied by putting big standing current (bias current), so the percentage of signal is small compared to bias current (class A).

The fluctuating voltage is remedied by cascodes, that is to lock the operating voltage of the gain transistor.

I tought that is it. But that old thread discuss about how cascodes gives "FATIGUING" sound for long time listening. Actually I still have questions, why Mr. Nelson Pass seldom use cascode, inspite he has his own patent on cascodes? He only uses it for small FETS or dividing thermal dissipation.

Is it true, while cascode can help with measurement figures, it is bad for listening? What is the reason behind it?

Quote:
The emphasis is on properly done; The CCS which supplies both the input gain device (the one being cascoded) and the cascode device has to be high quality, and there has to be
adequate voltage margins provided for it - which is not always
done.
What is a high quality CCS looks like? How much is adequate voltage margin?
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th February 2004, 04:28 AM   #15
jcx is offline jcx  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
Quote:
Originally posted by wrenchone
... The second has probably been done by someone else too, though I haven't heard about it.
probably because positive feedback in linear amplifiers fell out of fashion as pentodes became popular - the positive feedback (known as "regeneration") was useful to cancel the internal negative plate resistance feedback of triodes when larger external gains were desired

its going to be difficult to do a “apples to apples” comparison of folded cascode vs current mirrors given the number of inversions necessary to create a negative “current feedback” connection not being the same

you could try adding a common source output amp to circuit #2 but then you are also testing nested vs global feedback schemes as well
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th February 2004, 04:57 AM   #16
diyAudio Member
 
wrenchone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silicon Valley
The source follower buffer on the first circuit did little if anything to the simulated distortion figure. I would only use it when the circuit has to interface with the cold, cruel world of uncertain impedances. The current mirrors in the second circuit are only there for the bias, to make sure that the two current source loads are reasonably equal, and as benificial fallout, also to provide bias for the cascode transistors. The same thing could be done in countless other ways, but bipolar transistors are cheap...
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th February 2004, 05:56 AM   #17
diyAudio Member
 
wrenchone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silicon Valley
So sad, I took a closer look at the circuit on the right, jcx, and it does have positive feedback. For some reason, it didn't flop over to one side in simulation like it should. Shame on me for not staring at it harder...It could be fixed by adding another inverting stage or by returning the feedback to the input, but I'm not too interested in either approach. It looks like my folded cascode measurements will be confined for the time being to my power amplifier, once I get all the mods done and coax it back into its case. Now that one has proper negative feedback...
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Class A/B folded cascode amp roender Solid State 17 17th July 2007 02:08 PM
folded cascode the_tool Chip Amps 1 27th June 2006 09:53 PM
Symmetrical folded cascode. Mr Evil Solid State 195 1st April 2005 03:15 AM
Folded cascode question Won Solid State 3 11th January 2002 07:10 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:10 AM.

Page generated in 0.09117 seconds (83.02% PHP - 16.98% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio