IRF540 V IRF540n

mikelm · 18th February 2004, 09:33 PM

In simulation the IRF540n looks better - faster, lower distortion

Does anyone have any first hand experience if the 540n sounds any better ?

cheers

mike

mikelm · 18th February 2004, 09:40 PM

p.s. I intend to run them in class A at 2.0 - 2.5 Amps

richie00boy · 19th February 2004, 09:31 AM

I have been comparing these devices for a class-b amp. It looks as though the newer 'N' designation type is even more suited to switching than the original. The SOA of the 'N' is absolutely pathetic, the original is better.

I am having trouble getting hold of the original now though, the 'N' seems to be replacing it.

18th February 2004, 09:33 PM	#1
mikelm diyAudio Member Join Date: May 2003 Location: England	IRF540 V IRF540n In simulation the IRF540n looks better - faster, lower distortion Does anyone have any first hand experience if the 540n sounds any better ? cheers mike

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
IRF540 Amplifier	Ermac	Solid State	10	1st November 2009 01:21 AM
Ir2104+ Irf540	zox2003	Class D	59	2nd December 2007 02:31 AM
Irf540 Amplifier	Dj BASS AMP	Solid State	57	13th November 2004 10:48 AM
Irf540	ANTHONY2181	Swap Meet	0	15th August 2002 04:39 PM

New To Site?	Need Help?
Register to Participate Search Privacy Statement Contact Us	Frequently Asked Questions Did you forget your password? Mark Forums Read


	Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving

18th February 2004, 09:40 PM	#2
mikelm diyAudio Member Join Date: May 2003 Location: England	p.s. I intend to run them in class A at 2.0 - 2.5 Amps

19th February 2004, 09:31 AM	#3
richie00boy Did it Himself diyAudio Member Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Gloucestershire, England, UK	I have been comparing these devices for a class-b amp. It looks as though the newer 'N' designation type is even more suited to switching than the original. The SOA of the 'N' is absolutely pathetic, the original is better. I am having trouble getting hold of the original now though, the 'N' seems to be replacing it.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)